Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 766

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma brain metastases (COMBI-MB): a multicentre, multicohort, open-label, phase 2 trial

Open access
Davies, Michael A, Saiag, Philippe, Robert, Caroline, Grob, Jean-Jacques, Flaherty, Keith T, Arance, Ana, Chiarion-Sileni, Vanna, Thomas, Luc, Lesimple, Thierry, Mortier, Laurent, Moschos, Stergios J, Hogg, David, Márquez-Rodas, Iván, Del Vecchio, Michele, Lebbé, Céleste, Meyer, Nicolas, Zhang, Ying, Huang, Yingjie, Mookerjee, Bijoyesh, Long, Georgina V·2017·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Summary Background Dabrafenib plus trametinib (D+T) improves outcomes in BRAF V600–mutant metastatic melanoma without brain metastases; however, activity of D+T has not been studied in active melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Here, we report results from the phase 2 trial COMBI-MB. Our aim was to build upon the current body of evidence of targeted therapy in melanoma brain metastases through an evaluation of D+T in patients with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma brain metastases. Methods This ongoing open-label, phase 2 study (NCT02039947) evaluated dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily in four melanoma patient cohorts: (A) BRAF V600E, asymptomatic MBM, no prior local brain therapy; (B) BRAF V600E, asymptomatic MBM, prior local brain therapy; (C) BRAF V600D/K/R, asymptomatic MBM, with or without prior local brain therapy; and (D) BRAF V600D/E/K/R, symptomatic MBM, with or without prior local brain therapy. The primary objective was to assess intracranial response rate (IRR) in cohort A in the all-treated-subjects population. Secondary endpoints included IRR in cohorts B–D; extracranial and overall response rates; disease control rates; duration of intracranial, extracranial, and overall response; progression-free survival; overall survival; and safety. Findings A total of 125 patients were enrolled (A: n=76; B: n=16; C: n=16; D: n=17). At the data cutoff (November 28, 2016; median follow-up 8·5 months) investigator-assessed IRR was 58% (n=44/76) in cohort A. Intracranial response by investigator assessment was also achieved in 9 (56%) of 16 patients in cohort B, 7 (44%) of 16 patients in cohort C, and 10 (59%) of 17 patients in cohort D. Safety results were consistent with prior D+T studies, with 60 (48%) of 125 patients across cohorts experiencing grade 3/4 adverse events. The most common serious adverse events across cohorts were pyrexia (n=9/125; 7%) and ejection fraction decreased (n=5/125; 4%). Interpretation D+T was active with a manageable safety profile in patients with BRAF V600–mutant MBMs, but the median duration of response was relatively short. These results provide evidence of clinical benefit with D+T and support the need for additional research to further improve outcomes in patients with MBMs. Funding Novartis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30429-1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 766

Metadata

Authors
Davies, M. A., Saiag, P., Robert, C., Grob, J.-J., Flaherty, K. T., Arance, A., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Thomas, L., Lesimple, T., Mortier, L., Moschos, S. J., Hogg, D., Márquez-Rodas, I., Del Vecchio, M., Lebbé, C., Meyer, N., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Mookerjee, B., & Long, G. V.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
863-873
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620651944
Cited by
766
References
4
FWCI
27.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma brain metastases (COMBI-MB): a multicentre, multicohort, open-label, phase 2 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30429-1
The paper
Davies, M. A., Saiag, P., Robert, C., Grob, J.-J., Flaherty, K. T., Arance, A., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Thomas, L., Lesimple, T., Mortier, L., Moschos, S. J., Hogg, D., Márquez-Rodas, I., Del Vecchio, M., Lebbé, C., Meyer, N., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Mookerjee, B., & Long, G. V. (2017). Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma brain metastases (COMBI-MB): a multicentre, multicohort, open-label, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30429-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.