Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term outcomes of patients with active melanoma brain metastases treated with combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CheckMate 204): final results of an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study

Open access
Tawbi, Hussein A, Forsyth, Peter A, Hodi, F Stephen, Algazi, Alain P, Hamid, Omid, Lao, Christopher D, Moschos, Stergios J, Atkins, Michael B, Lewis, Karl, Postow, Michael A, Thomas, Reena P, Glaspy, John, Jang, Sekwon, Khushalani, Nikhil I, Pavlick, Anna C, Ernstoff, Marc S, Reardon, David A, Kudchadkar, Ragini, Tarhini, Ahmad, Chung, Caroline, Ritchings, Corey, Durani, Piyush, Askelson, Margarita, Puzanov, Igor, Margolin, Kim A·2021·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Summary Background Combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab was efficacious in patients with asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM) in CheckMate 204, but showed low efficacy in patients with symptomatic MBM. Here, we provide final 3-year follow-up data from the trial. Methods This open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study (CheckMate 204) included adults (aged ≥18 years) with measurable MBM (0·5–3·0 cm in diameter). Asymptomatic patients (cohort A) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and no neurological symptoms or baseline corticosteroid use; symptomatic patients (cohort B) had an ECOG performance status of 0–2 with stable neurological symptoms and could be receiving low-dose dexamethasone. Nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was given intravenously every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks for up to 2 years, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was intracranial clinical benefit rate (complete responses, partial responses, or stable disease lasting ≥6 months) assessed in all treated patients. Intracranial progression-free survival and overall survival were key secondary endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02320058. Findings Between Feb 19, 2015, and Nov 1, 2017, 119 (72%) of 165 screened patients were enrolled and treated: 101 patients were asymptomatic (cohort A; median follow-up 34·3 months [IQR 14·7–36·4]) and 18 were symptomatic (cohort B; median follow-up 7·5 months [1·2–35·2]). Investigator-assessed intracranial clinical benefit was observed in 58 (57·4% [95% CI 47·2–67·2]) of 101 patients in cohort A and three (16·7% [3·6–41·4]) of 18 patients in cohort B; investigator-assessed objective response was observed in 54 (53·5% [43·3–63·5]) patients in cohort A and three (16·7% [3·6–41·4]) patients in cohort B. 33 (33%) patients in cohort A and three (17%) patients in cohort B had an investigator-assessed intracranial complete response. For patients in cohort A, 36-month intracranial progression-free survival was 54·1% (95% CI 42·7–64·1) and overall survival was 71·9% (61·8–79·8). For patients in cohort B, 36-month intracranial progression-free survival was 18·9% (95% CI 4·6–40·5) and overall survival was 36·6% (14·0–59·8). The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (15 [15%] of 101 patients each) in cohort A; no grade 3 TRAEs occurred in more than one patient each in cohort B, and no grade 4 events occurred. The most common serious TRAEs were colitis, diarrhoea, hypophysitis, and increased alanine aminotransferase (five [5%] of each among the 101 patients in cohort A); no serious TRAE occurred in more than one patient each in cohort B. There was one treatment-related death (myocarditis in cohort A). Interpretation The durable 3-year response, overall survival, and progression-free survival rates for asymptomatic patients support first-line use of nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Symptomatic disease in patients with MBM remains difficult to treat, but some patients achieve a long-term response with the combination. Funding Bristol Myers Squibb.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00545-3

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Tawbi, H. A., Forsyth, P. A., Hodi, F. S., Algazi, A. P., Hamid, O., Lao, C. D., Moschos, S. J., Atkins, M. B., Lewis, K., Postow, M. A., Thomas, R. P., Glaspy, J., Jang, S., Khushalani, N. I., Pavlick, A. C., Ernstoff, M. S., Reardon, D. A., Kudchadkar, R., Tarhini, A., Chung, C., Ritchings, C., Durani, P., Askelson, M., Puzanov, I., & Margolin, K. A.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
1692-1704
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214532628
Cited by
334
References
23
FWCI
33.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term outcomes of patients with active melanoma brain metastases treated with combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CheckMate 204): final results of an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00545-3
The paper
Tawbi, H. A., Forsyth, P. A., Hodi, F. S., Algazi, A. P., Hamid, O., Lao, C. D., Moschos, S. J., Atkins, M. B., Lewis, K., Postow, M. A., Thomas, R. P., Glaspy, J., Jang, S., Khushalani, N. I., Pavlick, A. C., Ernstoff, M. S., Reardon, D. A., Kudchadkar, R., Tarhini, A., . . . Margolin, K. A. (2021). Long-term outcomes of patients with active melanoma brain metastases treated with combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab (CheckMate 204): final results of an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00545-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.