Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Observations on intrauterine oxygen tension measured by fibre-optic microsensors

Ottosen, Lars DM, Hindkjær, Johnny, Husth, Merete, Petersen, Dorrit Elschner, Kirk, John, Ingerslev, Hans Jakob·2006·Reproductive BioMedicine Online
DOI 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61443-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Understanding the biology of reproductive organs is essential for the development of assisted reproductive techniques. There is at present no direct evidence for either the concentration and dynamics of intrauterine oxygen tension at the endometrial surface, nor its importance for the receptiveness of the endometrium. In this study a new method measured mid-cycle (ranging from day 12-18) endometrial surface oxygen tension in 21 patients referred to intrauterine insemination (IUI). Time series was measured online for a period of 5-10 min. The (mean) individual oxygen tension among patients varied from 4 to 27% air saturation. Overall mean oxygen tension among all patients was 11.8% air saturation. Within the same patient, considerable time-related variations were observed. Some patients exhibited rhythmic oscillations with a frequency in the order of 1 min, whereas others did not show any regular patterns. A good description of endometrial surface oxygen concentration and dynamics was thus obtained, but given the relatively small number of participants, an association with pregnancy following insemination could not be established. Further studies using this new method could elucidate the association between individual intrauterine activity, embryo implantation and endometrial surface oxygen tension.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61443-5

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 89

Metadata

Authors
Ottosen, L. D., Hindkjær, J., Husth, M., Petersen, D. E., Kirk, J., & Ingerslev, H. J.
Venue
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
380-385
ISSN
1472-6483
DOI
10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61443-5
Cited by
89
References
28
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.