Cited by 139Influenza Virus Research StudiesRespiratory viral infections researchHistorical and modern epidemiology studies

World war I may have allowed the emergence of “Spanish” influenza.

Oxford, JS, Sefton, A, Jackson, R, Innes, W, Daniels, RS, Johnson, NPAS·2002·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The 1918 influenza pandemic caused 40 million deaths, and so dwarfed in mortality and morbidity the preceding pandemic of 1889 and the 1957 and 1968 pandemics. In retrospect, much can be learnt about the source, the possible subterranean spread of virus, and the genetic basis of virulence. The World Health Organization has urged every nation to prepare a pandemic plan for the first global outbreak of the 21st century. We present an appraisal of epidemiological and mortality evidence of early outbreaks of respiratory disease in France and the UK in the years 1915 to 1917. Certain of these earlier focal outbreaks--called epidemic bronchitis rather than influenza--occurred during the winter months when influenza was known to be in circulation, and presented with a particular heliotrope cyanosis that was so prominent in the clinical diagnosis in the world pandemic outbreak of 1918-1919 (the Great Pandemic). The outbreaks in army camps at Etaples in France and Aldershot in the UK in 1916-1917 caused very high mortality in 25-35 year olds. Increased deaths from bronchopneumonia and influenza were also recorded in England. We deduce that early focal outbreaks of influenza-like disease occurred in Europe and on the balance of probability the Great Pandemic was not initiated in Spain in 1918 but in another European country in the winter of 1916 or 1917. We suggest that the pandemic had its origins on the Western Front, and that World War I was a contributor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00185-8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At least 90% of lung tissue samples from 1918 pandemic post-mortems showed evidence of bacterial infection.

    “Additional post-mortems of lung tissue suggest that at least 90% of samples showed evidence of bacterial infection (Oxford et al., 2002; Morens et al., 2008; Chien et al., 2009).”

    From Secondary bacterial infections associated with influenza pandemics (2017) · cites this paper as Oxford et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oxford, J., Sefton, A., Jackson, R., Innes, W., Daniels, R., & Johnson, N.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-02
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
111-114
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164014373
Cited by
139
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and modern epidemiology studies
Keywords
1918 influenza pandemic, pandemic origins, World War I, military camps, Etaples, Aldershot, bronchopneumonia, influenza mortality, pandemic preparedness, viral virulence
MeSH terms
Disaster Planning, Disease Outbreaks, France, United Kingdom, Humans, Influenza, Human, Warfare, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review