The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 137 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laboratory diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis
Open accessAbstract
Invasive aspergillosis occurs in a wide range of clinical scenarios, is protean in its manifestations, and is still associated with an unacceptably high mortality rate. Early diagnosis is critical to a favourable outcome, but is difficult to achieve with current methods. Deep tissue diagnostic specimens are often difficult to obtain from critically ill patients. Newer antifungal agents exhibit differential mould activity, thus increasing the importance of establishing a specific diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. For these reasons, a range of alternate diagnostic strategies have been investigated. Most investigative efforts have focused on molecular and serological diagnostic techniques. The detection of metabolites produced by Aspergillus spp and a range of aspergillus-specific antibodies represent additional, but relatively underused, diagnostic avenues. The detection of galactomannan has been incorporated into diagnostic criteria for invasive aspergillosis, reflecting an increased understanding of the performance, utility, and limitations of this technique. Measurement of (1,3)-beta-D glucan in blood may be useful as a preliminary screening tool for invasive aspergillosis, despite the fact that this antigen can be detected in a number of other fungi. There have been extensive efforts directed toward the detection of Aspergillus spp DNA, but a lack of technical standardisation and relatively poor understanding of DNA release and kinetics continues to hamper the broad applicability of this technique. This review considers the application, utility, and limitations of the currently available and investigational diagnostic modalities for invasive aspergillosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“conventional microscopy and culture of respiratory tract sample has only low sensitivity and specificity of around 50%.57”
From Co-infections in people with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2020) · cites this paper as [57]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Manual of Clinical Microbiology.
(1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-6-939_2 · Cited by 14,435
Voriconazole versus Amphotericin B for Primary Therapy of Invasive Aspergillosis
Herbrecht, R., Denning, D. W., Patterson, T. F., Bennett, J. E., Greene, R. E., Oestmann, J.-W., Kern, W. V., Marr, K. A., Ribaud, P., Lortholary, O., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020191 · Cited by 3,304
Self-citationManual of clinical microbiology
Drasar, B. (2003) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/s0035-9203(03)90074-5 · Cited by 2,605
Aşçıoğlu, S., Rex, J. H., de Pauw, B., Bennett, J. E., Billé, J., Crokaert, F., Denning, D. W., Donnelly, J. P., Edwards, J. E., Erjavec, Z., et al. (2002) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/323335 · Cited by 2,315
Self-citationAspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis
Latgé, J.-P. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.2.310 · Cited by 2,307
de Hoog, S., Guarro, J., Gené, J., & Figueras, M. J. (2000) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 1,427
Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus
Nierman, W. C., Pain, A., Anderson, M. J., Wortman, J. R., Kim, H. S., Arroyo, J., Berriman, M., Abe, K., Archer, D. B., Bermejo, C., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04332 · Cited by 1,391
Self-citationMitchell, D., Wells, A. U., Spiro, S. G., & Moller, D. (2012) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b13322-18 · Cited by 828
Wald, A., Leisenring, W., van Burik, J., & Bowden, R. A. (1997) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/516480 · Cited by 742
Odabaşı, Z., Mattiuzzi, G. N., Estey, E., Kantarjian, H. M., Saeki, F., Ridge, R. J., Ketchum, P. A., Finkelman, M., Rex, J. H., & Ostrosky‐Zeichner, L. (2004) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/421944 · Cited by 641
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De Pauw, B., Walsh, T. J., Donnelly, J. P., Stevens, D. A., Edwards, J. E., Calandra, T., Pappas, P. G., Maertens, J., Lortholary, O., Kauffman, C. A., et al. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/588660 · Cited by 4,917
Self-citationFreifeld, A. G., Bow, E. J., Sepkowitz, K. A., Boeckh, M. J., Ito, J. I., Mullen, C. A., Raad, I. I., Rolston, K. V., Young, J.-A. H., & Wingard, J. R. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir073 · Cited by 3,463
Patterson, T. F., Thompson, G. R., Denning, D. W., Fishman, J. A., Hadley, S., Herbrecht, R., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Marr, K. A., Morrison, V. A., Nguyen, M. H., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw326 · Cited by 2,926
Self-citationPosaconazole vs. Fluconazole or Itraconazole Prophylaxis in Patients with Neutropenia
Cornely, O. A., Maertens, J. A., Winston, D. J., Perfect, J. R., Ullmann, A. J., Walsh, T. J., HELFGOTT, D. C., Hołowiecki, J., Stockelberg, D., Goh, Y. T., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061094 · Cited by 1,802
Self-citationCo-infections in people with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lansbury, L., Lim, B., Baskaran, V., & Lim, W. S. (2020) · Journal of Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.046 · Cited by 1,619
Metadata
- Authors
- Hope, W., Walsh, T., & Denning, D.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 609-622
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066421491
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- invasive aspergillosis, Aspergillus, laboratory diagnosis, galactomannan, β-1,3-glucan, molecular diagnosis, serological diagnosis, fungal DNA detection, critically ill patients
- MeSH terms
- Antibodies, Fungal, Aspergillosis, Aspergillus, DNA, Fungal, Galactose, Humans, Mannans, Clinical Laboratory Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
