The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials
Open accessAbstract
Background Because the general population is largely naive to H5N1 influenza, antibodies generated to H5 allow analysis of novel influenza vaccines independent of background immunity from previous infection. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of DNA encoding H5 as a priming vaccine to improve antibody responses to inactivated influenza vaccination. Methods In VRC 306 and VRC 310, two sequentially enrolled phase 1, open-label, randomised clinical trials, healthy adults (age 18–60 years) were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular H5 DNA (4 mg) at day 0 or twice, at day 0 and week 4, followed by H5N1 monovalent inactivated vaccine (MIV; 90 μg) at 4 or 24 weeks, and compared with a two-dose regimen of H5N1 MIV with either a 4 or 24 week interval. Antibody responses were assessed by haemagglutination inhibition (HAI), ELISA, neutralisation (ID80), and immunoassays for stem-directed antibodies. T cell responses were assessed by intracellular cytokine staining. After enrolment, investigators and individuals were not masked to group assignment. VRC 306 and VRC 310 are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00776711 and NCT01086657, respectively. Findings In VRC 306, 60 individuals were randomly assigned to the four groups (15 in each) and 59 received the vaccinations. In VRC 310, of the 21 individuals enrolled, 20 received the vaccinations (nine received a two-dose regimen of H5N1 MIV and 11 received H5 DNA at day 0 followed by H5N1 MIV at week 24). H5 DNA priming was safe and enhanced H5-specific antibody titres following an H5N1 MIV boost, especially when the interval between DNA prime and MIV boost was extended to 24 weeks. In the two studies, DNA priming with a 24-week MIV boost interval induced protective HAI titres in 21 (81%) of 26 of individuals, with an increase in geometric mean titre (GMT) of more than four times that of individuals given the MIV-MIV regimen at 4 or 24 weeks (GMT 103–206 vs GMT 27–33). Additionally, neutralising antibodies directed to the conserved stem region of H5 were induced by this prime-boost regimen in several individuals. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were recorded. Interpretation DNA priming 24 weeks in advance of influenza vaccine boosting increased the magnitude of protective antibody responses (HAI) and in some cases induced haemagglutinin-stem-specific neutralising antibodies. A DNA-MIV vaccine regimen could enhance the efficacy of H5 or other influenza vaccines and shows that anti-stem antibodies can be elicited by vaccination in man. Funding National Institutes of Health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antibody Recognition of a Highly Conserved Influenza Virus Epitope
Ekiert, D. C., Bhabha, G., Elsliger, M.-A., Friesen, R. H. E., Jongeneelen, M., Throsby, M., Goudsmit, J., & Wilson, I. A. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1171491 · Cited by 1,326
Martin, J. E., Louder, M. K., Holman, L. A., Gordon, I. J., Enama, M. E., Larkin, B. D., Andrews, C. A., Vogel, L., Koup, R. A., Roederer, M., et al. (2008) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.026 · Cited by 267
Self-citation
Cited by
Feldman, R. A., Fuhr, R., Smolenov, I., (Mick) Ribeiro, A., Panther, L., Watson, M., Senn, J. J., Smith, M., Almarsson, Ӧ., Pujar, H. S., et al. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.074 · Cited by 454
Li, G.-M., Chiu, C., Wrammert, J., McCausland, M., Andrews, S. F., Zheng, N.-Y., Lee, J.-H., Huang, M., Qu, X., Edupuganti, S., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1118979109 · Cited by 393
Vaccine-Induced Antibodies that Neutralize Group 1 and Group 2 Influenza A Viruses
Joyce, M. G., Wheatley, A. K., Thomas, P. V., Chuang, G.-Y., Soto, C., Bailer, R. T., Druz, A., Georgiev, I. S., Gillespie, R. A., Kanekiyo, M., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.043 · Cited by 333
Self-citationEvaluation of candidate vaccine approaches for MERS-CoV
Wang, L., Shi, W., Joyce, M. G., Modjarrad, K., Zhang, Y., Leung, K., Lees, C. R., Zhou, T., Yassine, H. M., Kanekiyo, M., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8712 · Cited by 299
Self-citationNabel, G. J. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1204186 · Cited by 271
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ledgerwood, J. E., Wei, C.-J., Hu, Z., Gordon, I. J., Enama, M. E., Hendel, C. S., McTamney, P. M., Pearce, M. B., Yassine, H. M., Boyington, J. C., Bailer, R., Tumpey, T. M., Koup, R. A., Mascola, J. R., Nabel, G. J., & Graham, B. S.
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 916-924
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117365839
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70240-7
- The paper
- Ledgerwood, J. E., Wei, C.-J., Hu, Z., Gordon, I. J., Enama, M. E., Hendel, C. S., McTamney, P. M., Pearce, M. B., Yassine, H. M., Boyington, J. C., Bailer, R., Tumpey, T. M., Koup, R. A., Mascola, J. R., Nabel, G. J., & Graham, B. S. (2011). DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70240-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.