Cited by 231Nosocomial Infections in ICUAntibiotic Use and ResistanceSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Aggressive versus conservative initiation of antimicrobial treatment in critically ill surgical patients with suspected intensive-care-unit-acquired infection: a quasi-experimental, before and after observational cohort study.

Open access
Hranjec, Tjasa, Rosenberger, Laura H, Swenson, Brian, Metzger, Rosemarie, Flohr, Tanya R, Politano, Amani D, Riccio, Lin M, Popovsky, Kimberley A +1 more·2012·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial treatment in critically ill patients can either be started as soon as infection is suspected or after objective data confirm an infection. We postulated that delaying antimicrobial treatment of patients with suspected infections in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) until objective evidence of infection had been obtained would not worsen patient mortality.Methods We did a 2-year, quasi-experimental, before and after observational cohort study of patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to the SICU of the University of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA, USA). From Sept 1, 2008, to Aug 31, 2009, aggressive treatment was used: patients suspected of having an infection on the basis of clinical grounds had blood cultures sent and antimicrobial treatment started. From Sept 1, 2009, to Aug 31, 2010, a conservative strategy was used, with antimicrobial treatment started only after objective findings confirmed an infection. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Analyses were by intention to treat.Findings Admissions to the SICU for the first and second years were 762 and 721, respectively, with 101 patients with SICU-acquired infections during the aggressive year and 100 patients during the conservative year. Compared with the aggressive approach, the conservative approach was associated with lower all-cause mortality (13/100 [13%] vs 27/101 [27%]; p=0·015), more initially appropriate therapy (158/214 [74%] vs 144/231 [62%]; p=0·0095), and a shorter mean duration of therapy (12·5 days [SD 10·7] vs 17·7 [28·1]; p=0·0080). After adjusting for age, sex, trauma involvement, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, and site of infection, the odds ratio for the risk of mortality in the aggressive therapy group compared with the conservative therapy group was 2·5 (95% CI 1·5-4·0).Interpretation Waiting for objective data to diagnose infection before treatment with antimicrobial drugs for suspected SICU-acquired infections does not worsen mortality and might be associated with better outcomes and use of antimicrobial drugs.Funding National Institutes of Health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70151-2

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hranjec, T., Rosenberger, L. H., Swenson, B., Metzger, R., Flohr, T. R., Politano, A. D., Riccio, L. M., Popovsky, K. A., & Sawyer, R. G.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Sawyer, Robert G
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
774-780
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157720105
Cited by
231
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Health (T32AI78875-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
intensive care unit-acquired infections, surgical intensive care unit, suspected infection, in-hospital mortality, antibiotic duration, blood culture, critically ill surgical patients, antimicrobial stewardship, APACHE II score, trauma patients, sepsis, pneumonia, surgical site infection, nosocomial infections
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anti-Infective Agents, Critical Care, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, APACHE, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review