Cited by 125Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentAntibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

A Critical Analysis of the Literature on Time-to-Antibiotics in Suspected Sepsis

Weinberger, Jeremy, Rhee, Chanu, Klompas, Michael·2020·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends immediate antibiotics for all patients with suspected sepsis and septic shock, ideally within 1 hour of recognition. Immediate antibiotic treatment is lifesaving for some patients, but a substantial fraction of patients initially diagnosed with sepsis have noninfectious conditions. Aggressive time-to-antibiotic targets risk promoting antibiotic overuse and antibiotic-associated harms for this subset of the population. An accurate understanding of the precise relationship between time-to-antibiotics and mortality for patients with possible sepsis is therefore critical to finding the best balance between assuring immediate antibiotics for those patients who truly need them versus allowing clinicians some time for rapid investigation to minimize the risk of overtreatment and antibiotic-associated harms for patients who are not infected. More than 30 papers have been published assessing the relationship between time-to-antibiotics and outcomes, almost all of which are observational cohort studies. Most report significant associations but all have important limitations. Key limitations include focusing just on the sickest subset of patients (only patients requiring intensive care and/or patients with septic shock), blending together mortality estimates from patients with very long intervals until antibiotics with patients with shorter intervals and reporting a single blended (and thus inflated) estimate for the average increase in mortality associated with each hour until antibiotics, and failure to control for large potential confounders including patients’ presenting signs and symptoms and granular measures of comorbidities and severity of illness. In this study, we elaborate on these potential sources of bias and try to distill a better understanding of what the true relationship between time-to-antibiotics and mortality may be for patients with suspected sepsis or septic shock.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jiaa146

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delayed admission of critically ill patients from the emergency department is associated with decreased sepsis bundle compliance and increased mortality, ventilator duration, and ICU and hospital length of stay.

    “Delayed admissions of critically ill patients from ED are associated with decreased sepsis bundle compliance and increased mortality, ventilator duration, and ICU and hospital length of stay (84).”
  • Delayed admissions of critically ill patients from ED are associated with decreased sepsis bundle compliance and increased mortality, ventilator duration, and ICU and hospital length of stay.

    “Delayed admissions of critically ill patients from ED are associated with decreased sepsis bundle compliance and increased mortality, ventilator duration, and ICU and hospital length of stay (84).”
  • All the aforementioned studies on antimicrobial timing were observational analyses and hence at risk of bias due to insufficient sample size, inadequate risk-adjustment, blending together effects of large delays with short delays, or other study design issues.

    “It should be noted that all the aforementioned studies were observational analyses and hence at risk of bias due to insufficient sample size, inadequate risk-adjustment, blending together the effects of large delays until antibiotics with short delays, or other study design issues [118].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weinberger, J., Rhee, C., & Klompas, M.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Klompas, Michael
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-07-21
Volume
222
Issue
Supplement_2
Pages
S110-S118
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W3044681161
Cited by
125
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08HS025008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
timing of antibiotic administration, suspected sepsis, septic shock, antibiotic overuse, mortality, confounding, Surviving Sepsis Campaign
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Sepsis, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review