Cited by 545Pneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsBacterial Infections and VaccinesMicrobial infections and disease research

Serotype-specific effectiveness and correlates of protection for the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: a postlicensure indirect cohort study

Andrews, Nick J, Waight, Pauline A, Burbidge, Polly, Pearce, Emma, Roalfe, Lucy, Zancolli, Marta, Slack, Mary, Ladhani, Shamez N +2 more·2014·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background Efficacy of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was inferred before licensure from an aggregate correlate of protection established for the seven-valent vaccine (PCV7). We did a postlicensure assessment of serotype-specific vaccine effectiveness and immunogenicity in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland to derive the correlates of protection for individual serotypes.Methods We assessed vaccine effectiveness against invasive pneumococcal disease using the indirect cohort method. We measured serotype-specific IgG concentration in infants after they were given two priming doses of PCV7 (n=126) or PCV13 (n=237) and opsonophagocytic antibody titre from a subset of these infants (n=100). We derived correlates of protection by relating percentage protection to a threshold antibody concentration achieved by an equivalent percentage of infants. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate vaccine effectiveness and reverse cumulative distribution curves to estimate correlates of protection.Findings For the 706 cases of invasive pneumococcal disease included in the study, PCV13 vaccine effectiveness after two doses before age 12 months or one dose from 12 months was 75% (95% CI 58-84). Vaccine effectiveness was 90% (34-98) for the PCV7 serotypes and 73% (55-84) for the six additional serotypes included in PCV13. Protection was shown for four of the six additional PCV13 serotypes (vaccine effectiveness for serotype 3 was not significant and no cases of serotype 5 infection occurred during the observation period). The vaccine effectiveness for PCV13 and PCV7 was lower than predicted by the aggregate correlate of protection of 0·35 μg/mL used during licensing. Calculated serotype-specific correlates of protection were higher than 0·35 μg/mL for serotypes 1, 3, 7F, 19A, 19F, and lower than 0·35 μg/mL for serotypes 6A, 6B, 18C, and 23F. Opsonophagocytic antibody titres of 1 in 8 or higher did not predict protection.Interpretation PCV13 provides significant protection for most of the vaccine serotypes. Although use of the aggregate correlate of protection of 0·35 μg/mL has enabled the licensing of effective new PCVs, serotype-specific correlates of protection vary widely. The relation between IgG concentration after priming and long-term protection needs to be better understood.Funding Public Health England and UK Department of Health Research and Development Directorate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(14)70822-9

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines contain the same polysaccharides from the bacterial surface chemically conjugated to a protein carrier.

    “Protein–polysaccharide conjugate vaccines contain the same polysaccharides from the bacterial surface, but in this case they are chemically conjugated to a protein carrier (mostly tetanus toxoid, or diphtheria toxoid or a mutant protein derived from it, known as CRM197)32–34.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, N. J., Waight, P. A., Burbidge, P., Pearce, E., Roalfe, L., Zancolli, M., Slack, M., Ladhani, S. N., Miller, E., & Goldblatt, D.
Affiliations
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Goldblatt, David
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
839-846
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128013943
Cited by
545
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
34.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Public Health England
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, PCV13, PCV7, correlates of protection, invasive pneumococcal disease, serotype-specific IgG, vaccine immunogenicity, infants, serotype 19A, serotype 1
MeSH terms
Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine, Antibodies, Bacterial, Child, Preschool, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Infant, Licensure, Serotyping, Cohort Studies, Vaccines, Conjugate, Pneumococcal Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review