The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Immunogenicity of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine and implications for duration of vaccine efficacy: secondary analysis of data from a phase 3 randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine targets the circumsporozoite protein, inducing antibodies associated with the prevention of Plasmodium falciparum infection. We assessed the association between anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres and the magnitude and duration of vaccine efficacy using data from a phase 3 trial done between 2009 and 2014. METHODS: Using data from 8922 African children aged 5-17 months and 6537 African infants aged 6-12 weeks at first vaccination, we analysed the determinants of immunogenicity after RTS,S/AS01 vaccination with or without a booster dose. We assessed the association between the incidence of clinical malaria and anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres using a model of anti-circumsporozoite antibody dynamics and the natural acquisition of protective immunity over time. FINDINGS: RTS,S/AS01-induced anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres were greater in children aged 5-17 months than in those aged 6-12 weeks. Pre-vaccination anti-circumsporozoite titres were associated with lower immunogenicity in children aged 6-12 weeks and higher immunogenicity in those aged 5-17 months. The immunogenicity of the booster dose was strongly associated with immunogenicity after primary vaccination. Anti-circumsporozoite titres wane according to a biphasic exponential distribution. In participants aged 5-17 months, the half-life of the short-lived component of the antibody response was 45 days (95% credible interval 42-48) and that of the long-lived component was 591 days (557-632). After primary vaccination 12% (11-13) of the response was estimated to be long-lived, rising to 30% (28-32%) after a booster dose. An anti-circumsporozoite antibody titre of 121 EU/mL (98-153) was estimated to prevent 50% of infections. Waning anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres predict the duration of efficacy against clinical malaria across different age categories and transmission intensities, and efficacy wanes more rapidly at higher transmission intensity. INTERPRETATION: Anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres are a surrogate of protection for the magnitude and duration of RTS,S/AS01 efficacy, with or without a booster dose, providing a valuable surrogate of effectiveness for new RTS,S formulations in the age groups considered. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Duration of Humoral Immunity to Common Viral and Vaccine Antigens
Amanna, I. J., Carlson, N. E., & Slifka, M. K. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa066092 · Cited by 1,286
Cited by
Datoo, M. S., Natama, M. H., Somé, A., Traoré, O., Rouamba, T., Bellamy, D., Yameogo, P., Valia, D., Tegneri, M., Ouedraogo, F., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00943-0 · Cited by 452
Self-citationT cell-mediated immunity to malaria
Kurup, S. P., Butler, N. S., & Harty, J. T. (2019) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0158-z · Cited by 242
Suscovich, T. J., Fallon, J. K., Das, J., Demas, A. R., Crain, J., Linde, C. H., Michell, A., Natarajan, H., Arevalo, C., Broge, T., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abb4757 · Cited by 142
Immune system development varies according to age, location, and anemia in African children
Hill, D. L., Carr, E. J., Rutishauser, T., Moncunill, G., Campo, J. J., Innocentin, S., Mpina, M., Nhabomba, A., Tumbo, A., Jairoce, C., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw9522 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- White, M. T., Verity, R., Griffin, J. T., Asante, K. P., Owusu-Agyei, S., Greenwood, B., Drakeley, C., Gesase, S., Lusingu, J., Ansong, D., Adjei, S., Agbenyega, T., Ogutu, B., Otieno, L., Otieno, W., Agnandji, S. T., Lell, B., Kremsner, P., Hoffman, I., Martinson, F., Kamthunzu, P., Tinto, H., Valea, I., Sorgho, H., Oneko, M., Otieno, K., Hamel, M. J., Salim, N., Mtoro, A., Abdulla, S., Aide, P., Sacarlal, J., Aponte, J. J., Njuguna, P., Marsh, K., Bejon, P., Riley, E. M., & Ghani, A. C.
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1450-1458
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1817614869
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunogenicity of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine and implications for duration of vaccine efficacy: secondary analysis of data from a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00239-x
- The paper
- White, M. T., Verity, R., Griffin, J. T., Asante, K. P., Owusu-Agyei, S., Greenwood, B., Drakeley, C., Gesase, S., Lusingu, J., Ansong, D., Adjei, S., Agbenyega, T., Ogutu, B., Otieno, L., Otieno, W., Agnandji, S. T., Lell, B., Kremsner, P., Hoffman, I., . . . Ghani, A. C. (2015). Immunogenicity of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine and implications for duration of vaccine efficacy: secondary analysis of data from a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00239-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.