Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunogenicity of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine and implications for duration of vaccine efficacy: secondary analysis of data from a phase 3 randomised controlled trial

Open access
White, Michael T, Verity, Robert, Griffin, Jamie T, Asante, Kwaku Poku, Owusu-Agyei, Seth, Greenwood, Brian, Drakeley, Chris, Gesase, Samwel, Lusingu, John, Ansong, Daniel, Adjei, Samuel, Agbenyega, Tsiri, Ogutu, Bernhards, Otieno, Lucas, Otieno, Walter, Agnandji, Selidji T, Lell, Bertrand, Kremsner, Peter, Hoffman, Irving, Martinson, Francis, Kamthunzu, Portia, Tinto, Halidou, Valea, Innocent, Sorgho, Hermann, Oneko, Martina, Otieno, Kephas, Hamel, Mary J, Salim, Nahya, Mtoro, Ali, Abdulla, Salim, Aide, Pedro, Sacarlal, Jahit, Aponte, John J, Njuguna, Patricia, Marsh, Kevin, Bejon, Philip, Riley, Eleanor M, Ghani, Azra C·2015·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine targets the circumsporozoite protein, inducing antibodies associated with the prevention of Plasmodium falciparum infection. We assessed the association between anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres and the magnitude and duration of vaccine efficacy using data from a phase 3 trial done between 2009 and 2014. METHODS: Using data from 8922 African children aged 5-17 months and 6537 African infants aged 6-12 weeks at first vaccination, we analysed the determinants of immunogenicity after RTS,S/AS01 vaccination with or without a booster dose. We assessed the association between the incidence of clinical malaria and anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres using a model of anti-circumsporozoite antibody dynamics and the natural acquisition of protective immunity over time. FINDINGS: RTS,S/AS01-induced anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres were greater in children aged 5-17 months than in those aged 6-12 weeks. Pre-vaccination anti-circumsporozoite titres were associated with lower immunogenicity in children aged 6-12 weeks and higher immunogenicity in those aged 5-17 months. The immunogenicity of the booster dose was strongly associated with immunogenicity after primary vaccination. Anti-circumsporozoite titres wane according to a biphasic exponential distribution. In participants aged 5-17 months, the half-life of the short-lived component of the antibody response was 45 days (95% credible interval 42-48) and that of the long-lived component was 591 days (557-632). After primary vaccination 12% (11-13) of the response was estimated to be long-lived, rising to 30% (28-32%) after a booster dose. An anti-circumsporozoite antibody titre of 121 EU/mL (98-153) was estimated to prevent 50% of infections. Waning anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres predict the duration of efficacy against clinical malaria across different age categories and transmission intensities, and efficacy wanes more rapidly at higher transmission intensity. INTERPRETATION: Anti-circumsporozoite antibody titres are a surrogate of protection for the magnitude and duration of RTS,S/AS01 efficacy, with or without a booster dose, providing a valuable surrogate of effectiveness for new RTS,S formulations in the age groups considered. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00239-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
White, M. T., Verity, R., Griffin, J. T., Asante, K. P., Owusu-Agyei, S., Greenwood, B., Drakeley, C., Gesase, S., Lusingu, J., Ansong, D., Adjei, S., Agbenyega, T., Ogutu, B., Otieno, L., Otieno, W., Agnandji, S. T., Lell, B., Kremsner, P., Hoffman, I., Martinson, F., Kamthunzu, P., Tinto, H., Valea, I., Sorgho, H., Oneko, M., Otieno, K., Hamel, M. J., Salim, N., Mtoro, A., Abdulla, S., Aide, P., Sacarlal, J., Aponte, J. J., Njuguna, P., Marsh, K., Bejon, P., Riley, E. M., & Ghani, A. C.
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1450-1458
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1817614869
Cited by
354
References
1
FWCI
27.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunogenicity of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine and implications for duration of vaccine efficacy: secondary analysis of data from a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00239-x
The paper
White, M. T., Verity, R., Griffin, J. T., Asante, K. P., Owusu-Agyei, S., Greenwood, B., Drakeley, C., Gesase, S., Lusingu, J., Ansong, D., Adjei, S., Agbenyega, T., Ogutu, B., Otieno, L., Otieno, W., Agnandji, S. T., Lell, B., Kremsner, P., Hoffman, I., . . . Ghani, A. C. (2015). Immunogenicity of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine and implications for duration of vaccine efficacy: secondary analysis of data from a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00239-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.