The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of a low-dose candidate malaria vaccine, R21 in adjuvant Matrix-M, with seasonal administration to children in Burkina Faso: a randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Stalled progress in controlling Plasmodium falciparum malaria highlights the need for an effective and deployable vaccine. RTS,S/AS01, the most effective malaria vaccine candidate to date, demonstrated 56% efficacy over 12 months in African children. We therefore assessed a new candidate vaccine for safety and efficacy. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial, the low-dose circumsporozoite protein-based vaccine R21, with two different doses of adjuvant Matrix-M (MM), was given to children aged 5-17 months in Nanoro, Burkina Faso-a highly seasonal malaria transmission setting. Three vaccinations were administered at 4-week intervals before the malaria season, with a fourth dose 1 year later. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly into the thigh. Group 1 received 5 μg R21 plus 25 μg MM, group 2 received 5 μg R21 plus 50 μg MM, and group 3, the control group, received rabies vaccinations. Children were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to groups 1-3. An independent statistician generated a random allocation list, using block randomisation with variable block sizes, which was used to assign participants. Participants, their families, and the local study team were all masked to group allocation. Only the pharmacists preparing the vaccine were unmasked to group allocation. Vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy were evaluated over 1 year. The primary objective assessed protective efficacy of R21 plus MM (R21/MM) from 14 days after the third vaccination to 6 months. Primary analyses of vaccine efficacy were based on a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all participants who received three vaccinations, allowing for inclusion of participants who received the wrong vaccine at any timepoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03896724. FINDINGS: From May 7 to June 13, 2019, 498 children aged 5-17 months were screened, and 48 were excluded. 450 children were enrolled and received at least one vaccination. 150 children were allocated to group 1, 150 children were allocated to group 2, and 150 children were allocated to group 3. The final vaccination of the primary series was administered on Aug 7, 2019. R21/MM had a favourable safety profile and was well tolerated. The majority of adverse events were mild, with the most common event being fever. None of the seven serious adverse events were attributed to the vaccine. At the 6-month primary efficacy analysis, 43 (29%) of 146 participants in group 1, 38 (26%) of 146 participants in group 2, and 105 (71%) of 147 participants in group 3 developed clinical malaria. Vaccine efficacy was 74% (95% CI 63-82) in group 1 and 77% (67-84) in group 2 at 6 months. At 1 year, vaccine efficacy remained high, at 77% (67-84) in group 1. Participants vaccinated with R21/MM showed high titres of malaria-specific anti-Asn-Ala-Asn-Pro (NANP) antibodies 28 days after the third vaccination, which were almost doubled with the higher adjuvant dose. Titres waned but were boosted to levels similar to peak titres after the primary series of vaccinations after a fourth dose administered 1 year later. INTERPRETATION: R21/MM appears safe and very immunogenic in African children, and shows promising high-level efficacy. FUNDING: The European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership, Wellcome Trust, and National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phase 1–2 Trial of a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine
Keech, C., Albert, G., Cho, I., Robertson, A., Reed, P., Neal, S., Plested, J. S., Zhu, M., Cloney-Clark, S., Zhou, H., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2026920 · Cited by 1,156
Self-citationFirst Results of Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children
The RTS, S. C. T. P. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102287 · Cited by 896
A Phase 3 Trial of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Infants
The RTS, S. C. T. P. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1208394 · Cited by 752
Bache, E. B., Agnandji, S. T., Lell, B., Fernandes, J. F., Abossolo, B. P., Kabwende, A. L., Adégnika, A. A., Mordmüller, B. G., Kremsner, P. G., Loembé, M. M., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.15496/publikation-6508 · Cited by 642
The RTS, S. C. T. P. (. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001685 · Cited by 474
The effect of air pollution on human physiological function in China: a longitudinal study
Guo, Y., Li, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, L., Chen, S., Yao, T., Qin, T., & Wu, S. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00612-1 · Cited by 423
Seven-Year Efficacy of RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine among Young African Children
Olotu, A., Fegan, G., Wambua, J., Nyangweso, G., Leach, A., Lievens, M., Kaslow, D. C., Njuguna, P., Marsh, K., & Bejon, P. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1515257 · Cited by 421
White, M. T., Verity, R., Griffin, J. T., Asante, K. P., Owusu-Agyei, S., Greenwood, B., Drakeley, C., Gesase, S., Lusingu, J., Ansong, D., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(15)00239-x · Cited by 354
Self-citationChanges in Malaria Epidemiology in Africa and New Challenges for Elimination
Nkumama, I. N., O’Meara, W. P., & Osier, F. H. A. (2017) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2016.11.006 · Cited by 286
Cited by
Peptides for Vaccine Development
Hamley, I. W. (2022) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.1c01238 · Cited by 104
Ko, K.-T., Lennartz, F., Mekhaiel, D., Guloglu, B., Marini, A., Deuker, D. J., Long, C. A., Jore, M. M., Miura, K., Biswas, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33379-6 · Cited by 32
King, L. D. W., Pulido, D., Barrett, J. R., Davies, H., Quinkert, D., Lias, A. M., Silk, S. E., Pattinson, D. J., Diouf, A., Williams, B. G., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101654 · Cited by 27
Self-citationOwalla, T. J., Hergott, D. E. B., Seilie, A. M., Staubus, W., Chavtur, C., Chang, M., Kublin, J. G., Egwang, T. G., & Murphy, S. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1003452 · Cited by 9
Ko, K.-T., Lennartz, F., Mekhaiel, D., Guloglu, B., Marini, A., Deuker, D. J., Long, C. A., Jore, M. M., Miura, K., Biswas, S., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.24.493318 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Datoo, M. S., Natama, M. H., Somé, A., Traoré, O., Rouamba, T., Bellamy, D., Yameogo, P., Valia, D., Tegneri, M., Ouedraogo, F., Soma, R., Sawadogo, S., Sorgho, F., Derra, K., Rouamba, E., Orindi, B., Ramos Lopez, F., Flaxman, A., Cappuccini, F., Kailath, R., Elias, S., Mukhopadhyay, E., Noe, A., Cairns, M., Lawrie, A., Roberts, R., Valéa, I., Sorgho, H., Williams, N., Glenn, G., Fries, L., Reimer, J., Ewer, K. J., Shaligram, U., Hill, A. V. S., & Tinto, H.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 397
- Issue
- 10287
- Pages
- 1809-1818
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W3158165973
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 65.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of a low-dose candidate malaria vaccine, R21 in adjuvant Matrix-M, with seasonal administration to children in Burkina Faso: a randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00943-0
- The paper
- Datoo, M. S., Natama, M. H., Somé, A., Traoré, O., Rouamba, T., Bellamy, D., Yameogo, P., Valia, D., Tegneri, M., Ouedraogo, F., Soma, R., Sawadogo, S., Sorgho, F., Derra, K., Rouamba, E., Orindi, B., Ramos Lopez, F., Flaxman, A., Cappuccini, F., . . . Tinto, H. (2021). Efficacy of a low-dose candidate malaria vaccine, R21 in adjuvant Matrix-M, with seasonal administration to children in Burkina Faso: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00943-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.