Cited by 183Fungal Infections and StudiesInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Efficacy of adjunctive sertraline for the treatment of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: An open-label dose-ranging study

Open access
Rhein, Joshua, Morawski, Bozena M, Hullsiek, Kathy Huppler, Nabeta, Henry W, Kiggundu, Reuben, Tugume, Lillian, Musubire, Abdu, Akampurira, Andrew +10 more·2016·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background Cryptococcus is the most common cause of adult meningitis in Africa. We assessed the safety and microbiological efficacy of adjunctive sertraline, previously shown to have in-vitro and in-vivo activity against cryptococcus.Methods In this open-label dose-finding study, we recruited HIV-infected individuals with cryptococcal meningitis who presented to Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda between Aug 14, 2013, and Aug 30, 2014. To assess safety and tolerability, the first 60 participants were given sertraline at escalating doses of 100 mg/day, 200 mg/day, 300 mg/day, or 400 mg/day as induction therapy for 2 weeks, followed by consolidation therapy with 200 mg/day for an additional 8 weeks. From Nov 29, 2013, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive open-label sertraline at predetermined doses of 200 mg/day, 300 mg/day, or 400 mg/day as induction therapy for 2 weeks, followed by consolidation therapy with 200 mg/day for 8 weeks. Dose assignment was made via computer-generated, permuted block randomisation stratified by antiretroviral therapy (ART) status for people with a first episode of meningitis. The primary outcome was 2-week cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) clearance rate of cryptococcus, termed early fungicidal activity, measured in patients with a first episode of culture-positive meningitis and two or more CSF cultures. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01802385.Findings Of the 330 individuals assessed, 172 HIV-infected adults with cryptococcal meningitis were enrolled. We gave 100 mg/day sertraline to 17 patients, 200 mg/day to 12 patients, 300 mg/day to 14 patients, and 400 mg/day to 17 patients. 112 participants were randomly assigned to receive sertraline at 200 mg (n=48), 300 mg (n=36), or 400 mg (n=28) daily for the first 2 weeks, and 200 mg/day thereafter. The final population consisted of 17 participants in the 100 mg group, 60 in the 200 mg group, 50 in the 300 mg group, and 45 in the 400 mg in group. Participants receiving any sertraline dose averaged a CSF clearance rate of -0·37 colony forming units per mL per day (95% CI -0·41 to -0·33). Incidence of paradoxical immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome was 5% (two of 43 newly starting ART) and no cases of relapse occurred over the 12-week study period. 38 (22%) of 172 participants had died at 2 weeks, and 69 (40%) had died at 12 weeks. Six grade 4 adverse events occurred in 17 participants receiving 100 mg, 14 events in 60 participants receiving 200 mg, 19 events in 50 participants receiving 300 mg, and eight events in 45 participants receiving 400 mg. Grade 4 or 5 adverse event risk did not differ between current US Food and Drug Administration-approved dosing of 100-200 mg/day and higher doses of 300-400 mg/day (hazard ratio 1·27, 95% CI 0·69-2·32; p=0·45).Interpretation Participants receiving sertraline had faster cryptococcal CSF clearance and a lower incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and relapse than that reported in the past. This inexpensive and off-patent oral medication is a promising adjunctive antifungal therapy.Funding National Institutes of Health, Grand Challenges Canada.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(16)00074-8

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a Phase II study and follow-up Phase III study in HIV patients infected by cryptococcal meningitis, sertraline had no convincing results.

    “Sertraline was initially demonstrated to be able to potentiate the action of azoles against cryptococcal microbes [60]; later, it was tested in a Phase II study [94] and a follow-up Phase III study in HIV patients infected by this fungus, but with no convincing results [95].”
  • Sertraline treatment alone or in combination with amphotericin B and fluconazole did not improve patient outcomes in a phase III trial in individuals treated for cryptococcal meningitis.

    “Unfortunately, despite promising results in phase I/II clinical trials, sertraline treatment alone or in combination with amphotericin B and fluconazole did not improve patient outcomes in a phase III trial with individuals being treated for cryptococcal meningits108.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]CLSI Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard—third edition. CLSI document M27-A3 2008 Wayne, PA Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
  2. [32]Ruiz NM Labriola DF Fiske WD Joshi AS Manion DJ Villano SA Efavirenz plasma levels and therapeutic response are affected in patients concomitantly receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors 2000 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Toronto, Canada

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhein, J., Morawski, B. M., Hullsiek, K. H., Nabeta, H. W., Kiggundu, R., Tugume, L., Musubire, A., Akampurira, A., Smith, K. D., Alhadab, A., Williams, D. A., Abassi, M., Bahr, N. C., Velamakanni, S. S., Fisher, J., Nielsen, K., Meya, D. B., & Boulware, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Infectious Diseases Institute (UG)
Corresponding author
Rhein, Joshua
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
809-818
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294119443
Cited by
183
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16
FWCI
27.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  • University of Minnesota
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI055433, K24AI096925)
  • Grand Challenges Canada (S4-0296-01)
  • Fogarty International Center (R25TW009345, R01NS086312)
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  • Duke University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
sertraline, cryptococcal meningitis, HIV infection, adjunctive antifungal therapy, dose-ranging, cerebrospinal fluid clearance, induction therapy, consolidation therapy, antiretroviral therapy, drug safety and tolerability, cryptococcal antigen serology, sub-Saharan Africa, antifungal drug development
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Cryptococcus, Female, Humans, Male, HIV Infections, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Meningitis, Cryptococcal, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review