Cited by 297COVID-19 epidemiological studiesGender, Health, and Social InequalityGender, Education, and Development Issues

The indirect impact of COVID-19 on women

Open access
Burki, Talha·2020·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30568-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The greater increase in disorder prevalence among females than males was anticipated because females are more likely to be affected by the social and economic consequences of the pandemic.

    “The greater increase in disorder prevalence among females than among males, which resulted in an even greater sex difference in prevalence than before the pandemic, was anticipated because females are more likely to be affected by the social and economic consequences of the pandemic.17, 18, 19”

    From Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    The opening passage (labelled Abstract) says women are more likely to bear the pandemic’s social and economic consequences, and a later passage (also labelled Abstract) describes their greater economic vulnerability. The paper does not report a greater increase in disorder prevalence among females or a widening pre-pandemic sex difference in prevalence. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Women are more likely to be financially disadvantaged during the pandemic due to lower salaries, less savings, and less secure employment than men.

    “Women are more likely to be financially disadvantaged during the pandemic due to lower salaries, less savings, and less secure employment than their male counterparts.17, 18, 19”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burki, T.
Corresponding author
Burki, Talha
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
904-905
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045930225
Cited by
297
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 20
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, sex differences in mortality, gender inequality, women's rights, lockdown, school closures, gender pay gap, women's employment, women's health, social determinants of health, gender-based violence, women's education, women's political participation, gender norms in the workplace
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Female, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Global Health, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review