Cited by 843SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Risk factors and disease profile of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK users of the COVID Symptom Study app: a prospective, community-based, nested, case-control study

Open access
Antonelli, Michela, Penfold, Rose S, Merino, Jordi, Sudre, Carole H, Molteni, Erika, Berry, Sarah, Canas, Liane S, Graham, Mark S +22 more·2022·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Background COVID-19 vaccines show excellent efficacy in clinical trials and real-world data, but some people still contract SARS-CoV-2 despite vaccination. This study sought to identify risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection post-vaccination and describe characteristics of post-vaccination illness. Methods Amongst 1,102,192 vaccinated UK adults from the COVID Symptom Study, 2394 (0.2%) cases of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified between 8th December 2020 and 1st May 2021. Using a control group of vaccinated individuals testing negative, we assessed the associations of age, frailty, comorbidity, area-level deprivation and lifestyle factors with infection. Illness profile post-vaccination was assessed using a second control group of unvaccinated cases. Findings Older adults with frailty (OR=2.78, 95% CI=[1.98-3.89], p-value<0.0001) and individuals living in most deprived areas (OR=1.22 vs. intermediate group, CI[1.04-1.43], p-value=0.01) had increased odds of post-vaccination infection. Risk was lower in individuals without obesity (OR=0.6, CI[0.44-0.82], p-value=0.001) and those reporting healthier diet (OR=0.73, CI[0.62-0.86], p-value<0.0001). Vaccination was associated with reduced odds of hospitalisation (OR=0.36, CI[0.28-0.46], p-value<0.0001), and high acute-symptom burden (OR=0.51, CI[0.42-0.61], p-value<0.0001). In older adults, risk of ≥28 days illness was lower following vaccination (OR=0.72, CI[0.51-1.00], p-value=0.05). Symptoms were reported less in positive-vaccinated vs. positive-unvaccinated individuals, except sneezing, which was more common post-vaccination (OR=1.24, CI[1.05-1.46], p-value=0.01). Interpretation Our findings suggest that older individuals with frailty and those living in most deprived areas are at increased risk of infection post-vaccination. We also showed reduced symptom burden and duration in those infected post-vaccination. Efforts to boost vaccine effectiveness in at-risk populations, and to targeted infection control measures, may still be appropriate to minimise SARS-CoV-2 infection. Funding This work is supported by UK Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) award to Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London and King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and via a grant to ZOE Global; the Wellcome Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Centre for Medical Engineering at King’s College London (WT 203148/Z/16/Z). Investigators also received support from the Chronic Disease Research Foundation, the Medical Research Council (MRC), British Heart Foundation, the UK Research and Innovation London Medical Imaging & Artificial Intelligence Centre for Value Based Healthcare, the Wellcome Flagship Programme (WT213038/Z/18/Z and Alzheimer’s Society (AS-JF-17-011), and the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness (MassCPR). Research in context Evidence before this study To identify existing evidence for risk factors and characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection post-vaccination, we searched PubMed for peer-reviewed articles published between December 1, 2020 and May 18, 2021 using keywords (“COVID-19” OR “SARS-CoV-2”) AND (“Vaccine” OR “vaccination”) AND (“infection”) AND (“risk factor*” OR “characteristic*”). We did not restrict our search by language or type of publication. Of 202 articles identified, we found no original studies on individual risk and protective factors for COVID-19 infection following vaccination nor on nature and duration of symptoms in vaccinated, community-based individuals. Previous studies in unvaccinated populations have shown that social and occupational factors influence risk of SARS-CoV-2infection, and that personal factors (age, male sex, multiple morbidities and frailty) increased risk for adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Phase III clinical trials have demonstrated good efficacy of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection, confirmed in published real-world data, which additionally showed reduced risk of adverse outcomes including hospitalisation and death. Added value of this study This is the first observational study investigating characteristics of and factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection after COVID-19 vaccination. We found that vaccinated individuals with frailty had higher rates of infection after vaccination than those without. Adverse determinants of health such as increased social deprivation, obesity, or a less healthy diet were associated with higher likelihood of infection after vaccination. In comparison with unvaccinated individuals, those with post-vaccination infection had fewer symptoms of COVID-19, and more were entirely asymptomatic. Fewer vaccinated individuals experienced five or more symptoms, required hospitalisation, and, in the older adult group, fewer had prolonged illness duration (symptoms lasting longer than 28 days

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00460-6

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with two-dose vaccination were more likely to have pre-existing comorbidities than those without/one-dose vaccination.

    “Notably, other studies showed that patients with two-dose vaccination were more likely to have pre-existing comorbidities than those without/one-dose vaccination [16,24,25].”

    From Protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination against long COVID syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results and Table 1 report comorbidities among post-vaccination cases and their matched controls, but do not establish that patients with two doses had more pre-existing comorbidities than patients with one or no dose. I searched our copy for a comorbidity comparison by vaccination-dose group and found no passage that settles the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Emerging data indicate that the risk of cognitive impairment may be decreased in breakthrough infections of fully vaccinated individuals.

    “Emerging data indicate that the risk of cognitive impairment may be decreased in breakthrough infections of fully vaccinated individuals (Antonelli et al., 2022).”

    From Mild respiratory COVID can cause multi-lineage neural cell and myelin dysregulation (2022) · cites this paper as Antonelli et al., 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Ledford H, Cyranoski D, Van Noorden R. The UK has approved a COVID vaccine-here's what scientists now want to know. Nature 2020; 588: 205-06.
  2. Voysey M, Clemens SAC, Madhi SA, et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet 2021; 397: 99-111.
  3. Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C, et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study. BMJ 2021; 373: n1088.
  4. Kustin T, Harel N, Finkel U, et al. Evidence for increased breakthrough rates of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in BNT162b2- mRNA-vaccinated individuals. Nat Med 2021; 27: 1379-84.
  5. McEwen AE, Cohen S, Bryson-Cahn C, et al. Variants of concern are overrepresented among post-vaccination breakthrough infections of SARS-CoV-2 in Washington State. Clin Infect Dis 2021; published online June 24. https://doi/org/10.1093/cid/ciab581. · DOI
  6. Docherty AB, Mulholland RH, Lone NI, et al. Changes in in-hospital mortality in the first wave of COVID-19: a multicentre prospective observational cohort study using the WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK. Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9: 773-85.
  7. Nguyen LH, Drew DA, Graham MS, et al. Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2020; 5: e475-83.
  8. Bowyer RCE, Varsavsky T, Thompson EJ, et al. Geo-social gradients in predicted COVID-19 prevalence in Great Britain: results from 1 960 242 users of the COVID-19 Symptoms Study app. Thorax 2021; 76: 723-25.
  9. de Lusignan S, Dorward J, Correa A, et al. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 among patients in the Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre primary care network: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20: 1034-42.
  10. Hewitt J, Carter B, Vilches-Moraga A, et al. The effect of frailty on survival in patients with COVID-19 (COPE): a multicentre, European, observational cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2020; 5: e444-51.
  11. Butt AA, Khan T, Yan P, Shaikh OS, Omer SB, Mayr F. Rate and risk factors for breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination. J Infect 2021; 83: 237-79.
  12. Sudre CH, Murray B, Varsavsky T, et al. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat Med 2021; 27: 626-31.
  13. Menni C, Valdes AM, Freidin MB, et al. Real-time tracking of self- reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19. Nat Med 2020; 26: 1037-40.
  14. Spiel C, Lapka D, Gradinger P, et al. A Euclidean distance-based matching procedure for nonrandomized comparison studies. Eur Psychol 2008; 13: 180-87.
  15. Raîche M, Hébert R, Dubois MF. PRISMA-7: a case-finding tool to identify older adults with moderate to severe disabilities. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2008; 47: 9-18.
  16. Zazzara MB, Penfold RS, Roberts AL, et al. Probable delirium is a presenting symptom of COVID-19 in frail, older adults: a cohort study of 322 hospitalised and 535 community-based older adults. Age Ageing 2021; 50: 40-48.
  17. Hoffmann S, Wiben A, Kruse M, Jacobsen KK, Lembeck MA, Holm EA. Predictive validity of PRISMA-7 as a screening instrument for frailty in a hospital setting. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e038768.
  18. Chiuve SE, Cook NR, Shay CM, et al. Lifestyle-based prediction model for the prevention of CVD: the Healthy Heart Score. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3: e000954.
  19. Murray B, Kerfoot E, Graham MS, et al. Accessible data curation and analytics for international-scale citizen science datasets. arXiv 2020; published online Nov 2. https://arxiv.org/ abs/2011.00867 (preprint). · arXiv
  20. Mansournia MA, Altman DG. Inverse probability weighting. BMJ 2016; 352: i189.
  21. Oh SJ, Lee JK, Shin OS. Aging and the immune system: the impact of immunosenescence on viral infection, immunity and vaccine immunogenicity. Immune Netw 2019; 19: e37.
  22. Ward H, Atchison C, Whitaker M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence in England following the first peak of the pandemic. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 905.
  23. Glenn DA, Hegde A, Kotzen E, et al. Systematic review of safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with kidney disease. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6: 1407-10.
  24. Sheikh A, McMenamin J, Taylor B, Robertson C. SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC in Scotland: demographics, risk of hospital admission, and vaccine effectiveness. Lancet 2021; 397: 2461-62.
  25. Varsavsky T, Graham MS, Canas LS, et al. Detecting COVID-19 infection hotspots in England using large-scale self-reported data from a mobile application: a prospective, observational study. Lancet Public Health 2021; 6: e21-29.
  26. O'Caoimh R, Costello M, Small C, et al. Comparison of frailty screening instruments in the emergency department. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16: e3626.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antonelli, M., Penfold, R. S., Merino, J., Sudre, C. H., Molteni, E., Berry, S., Canas, L. S., Graham, M. S., Klaser, K., Modat, M., Murray, B., Kerfoot, E., Chen, L., Deng, J., Österdahl, M. F., Cheetham, N. J., Drew, D. A., Nguyen, L. H., Pujol, J. C., Hu, C., Selvachandran, S., Polidori, L., May, A., Wolf, J., Chan, A. T., Hammers, A., Duncan, E. L., Spector, T. D., Ourselin, S., & Steves, C. J.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • ZOE (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Steves, Claire J
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
43-55
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3196353849
Cited by
843
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 226 · 2022: 271 · 2021: 102
FWCI
58.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
breakthrough infection, COVID-19 vaccines, risk factors, disease profile, COVID-19 symptoms, disease duration, symptom severity, body mass index, healthcare workers, vaccine effectiveness, real-world effectiveness, UK adults
MeSH terms
COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Vaccine Efficacy, Adult, Aged, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Vaccination, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, Self Report, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review