Cited by 55SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Vaccine effectiveness of two-dose BNT162b2 against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 among adolescents in Brazil and Scotland over time: a test-negative case-control study

Open access
Florentino, Pilar T V, Millington, Tristan, Cerqueira-Silva, Thiago, Robertson, Chris, de Araújo Oliveira, Vinicius, Júnior, Juracy B S, Alves, Flávia J O, Penna, Gerson O +15 more·2022·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about vaccine effectiveness over time among adolescents, especially against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant. This study assessed the associations between time since two-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 and the occurrence of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 among adolescents in Brazil and Scotland. METHODS: We did test-negative, case-control studies in adolescents aged 12-17 years with COVID-19-related symptoms in Brazil and Scotland. We linked records of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and antigen tests to national vaccination and clinical records. We excluded tests from individuals who did not have symptoms, were vaccinated before the start of the national vaccination programme, received vaccines other than BNT162b2 or a SARS-CoV-2 booster dose of any kind, or had an interval between their first and second dose of fewer than 21 days. Additionally, we excluded negative SARS-CoV-2 tests recorded within 14 days of a previous negative test, negative tests recorded within 7 days after a positive test, any test done within 90 days after a positive test, and tests with missing sex and location information. Cases (SARS-CoV-2 test-positive adolescents) and controls (test-negative adolescents) were drawn from a sample of individuals in whom tests were collected within 10 days of symptom onset. We estimated the adjusted odds ratio and vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 for both countries and against severe COVID-19 (hospitalisation or death) for Brazil across fortnightly periods. FINDINGS: We analysed 503 776 tests from 2 948 538 adolescents in Brazil between Sept 2, 2021, and April 19, 2022, and 127 168 tests from 404 673 adolescents in Scotland between Aug 6, 2021, and April 19, 2022. Vaccine effectiveness peaked at 14-27 days after the second dose in both countries during both waves, and was significantly lower against symptomatic infection during the omicron-dominant period in Brazil (64·7% [95% CI 63·0-66·3]) and in Scotland (82·6% [80·6-84·5]), than it was in the delta-dominant period (80·7% [95% CI 77·8-83·3] in Brazil and 92·8% [85·7-96·4] in Scotland). Vaccine efficacy started to decline from 27 days after the second dose for both countries, reducing to 5·9% (95% CI 2·2-9·4) in Brazil and 50·6% (42·7-57·4) in Scotland at 98 days or more during the omicron-dominant period. In Brazil, protection against severe disease remained above 80% from 28 days after the second dose and was 82·7% (95% CI 68·8-90·4) at 98 days or more after receiving the second dose. INTERPRETATION: We found waning vaccine protection of BNT162b2 against symptomatic COVID-19 infection among adolescents in Brazil and Scotland from 27 days after the second dose. However, protection against severe COVID-19 outcomes remained high at 98 days or more after the second dose in the omicron-dominant period. Booster doses for adolescents need to be considered. FUNDING: UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council), Scottish Government, Health Data Research UK BREATHE Hub, Fiocruz, Fazer o Bem Faz Bem programme, Brazilian National Research Council, and Wellcome Trust. TRANSLATION: For the Portuguese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00451-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Xu W, Tang J, Chen C, et al. Safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in children and/or adolescents: a meta-analysis. J Infect 2022; 84: 722-46.
  2. Reis BY, Barda N, Leshchinsky M, et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine against delta variant in adolescents. N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 2101-03.
  3. Lutrick K, Rivers P, Yoo YM, et al. Interim estimate of vaccine effectiveness of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among adolescents aged 12-17 years- Arizona, July-December 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70: 1761-65.
  4. Oliveira CR, Niccolai LM, Sheikha H, et al. Assessment of clinical effectiveness of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in US adolescents. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5: e220935.
  5. Hoffmann M, Krüger N, Schulz S, et al. The omicron variant is highly resistant against antibody-mediated neutralization: implications for control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cell 2022; 185: 447-56.e11.
  6. Katikireddi SV, Cerqueira-Silva T, Vasileiou E, et al. Two-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine protection against COVID-19 hospital admissions and deaths over time: a retrospective, population-based cohort study in Scotland and Brazil. Lancet 2022; 399: 25-35.
  7. Klein NP, Stockwell MS, Demarco M, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination in preventing COVID-19-associated emergency department and urgent care encounters and hospitalizations among nonimmunocompromised children and adolescents aged 5-17 years-VISION network, 10 states, April 2021-January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71: 352-58.
  8. Zimmermann P, Curtis N. Why is COVID-19 less severe in children? A review of the proposed mechanisms underlying the age-related difference in severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Arch Dis Child 2020; 106: 429-39.
  9. Vandenbroucke JP, Brickley EB, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, Pearce N. A test-negative design with additional population controls can be used to rapidly study causes of the SARS-COV-2 epidemic. Epidemiology 2020; 31: 836-43.
  10. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, et al. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 2015; 12: e1001885.
  11. Simpson CR, Robertson C, Vasileiou E, et al. Early pandemic evaluation and enhanced surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II): protocol for an observational study using linked Scottish national data. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e039097.
  12. Sheikh A, McMenamin J, Taylor B, Robertson C. SARS-CoV-2 delta VOC in Scotland: demographics, risk of hospital admission, and vaccine effectiveness. Lancet 2021; 397: 2461-62.
  13. Patone M, Mei XW, Handunnetthi L, et al. Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med 2022; 28: 410-22.
  14. Mulholland RH, Vasileiou E, Simpson CR, et al. Cohort profile: early pandemic evaluation and enhanced surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II) database. Int J Epidemiol 2021; 50: 1064-74.
  15. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 2011; 45: 1-67.
  16. Khoury DS, Cromer D, Reynaldi A, et al. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med 2021; 27: 1205-11.
  17. Cele S, Jackson L, Khoury DS, et al. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature 2022; 602: 654-56.
  18. Powell AA, Kirsebom F, Stowe J, et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 against COVID-19 in adolescents. Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22: 581-83.
  19. Fowlkes AL, Yoon SK, Lutrick K, et al. Effectiveness of 2-dose BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) mRNA vaccine in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among children aged 5-11 years and adolescents aged 12-15 years-PROTECT cohort, July 2021- February 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71: 422-28.
  20. Mensah AA, Campbell H, Stowe J, et al. Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in children: a prospective national surveillance study between January, 2020, and July, 2021, in England. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2022; 6: 384-92.
  21. Westreich D, Cole SR. Invited commentary: positivity in practice. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 171: 674-77, discussion 678-81.
  22. Schnitzer ME. Estimands and estimation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness under the test-negative design: connections to causal inference. Epidemiology 2022; 33: 325-33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Florentino, P. T. V., Millington, T., Cerqueira-Silva, T., Robertson, C., de Araújo Oliveira, V., Júnior, J. B. S., Alves, F. J. O., Penna, G. O., Vital Katikireddi, S., Boaventura, V. S., Werneck, G. L., Pearce, N., McCowan, C., Sullivan, C., Agrawal, U., Grange, Z., Ritchie, L. D., Simpson, C. R., Sheikh, A., Barreto, M. L., Rudan, I., Barral-Netto, M., & Paixão, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Public Health Scotland (GB)
  • Instituto Gonçalo Moniz (BR)
  • Universidade de Brasília (BR)
  • Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
Florentino, Pilar T V
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
1577-1586
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4291282982
Cited by
55
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Arca - Repositório Institucional da Fiocruz (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (E-26/210\u00B7180/2020, SCAF/15/02)
  • Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (PNX0008/2014)
  • Wellcome Trust (213589/Z/18/Z)
  • Scottish Government (SPHSU17)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00022/2)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Chief Scientist Office
  • UK Research and Innovation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
BNT162b2, COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, adolescents, Omicron variant, time since vaccination, symptomatic COVID-19, severe COVID-19, hospitalization, vaccine waning, Brazil, Scotland, test-negative case-control, booster vaccination
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Vaccine Efficacy, BNT162 Vaccine, Adolescent, Brazil, Humans, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review