Cited by 177Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Apixaban versus aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a predefined subgroup analysis from AVERROES, a randomised trial

Open access
Diener, Hans-Christoph, Eikelboom, John, Connolly, Stuart J, Joyner, Campbell D, Hart, Robert G, Lip, Gregory YH, O'Donnell, Martin, Hohnloser, Stefan H +3 more·2012·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background In the AVERROES study, apixaban, a novel factor Xa inhibitor, reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation who were at high risk of stroke but unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy. We aimed to investigate whether the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) would show a greater benefit from apixaban compared with aspirin than would patients without previous cerebrovascular events.Methods In AVERROES, 5599 patients (mean age 70 years) with atrial fibrillation who were at increased risk of stroke and unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist therapy were randomly assigned to receive apixaban (5 mg twice daily) or aspirin (81-324 mg per day). The mean follow-up was 1·1 years. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Patients and investigators were masked to study treatment. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, we used Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year event risk and Cox proportional hazards regression models to compare the effects of apixaban in patients with and without previous stroke or TIA. AVERROES is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00496769.Findings In patients with previous stroke or TIA, ten events of stroke or systemic embolism occurred in the apixaban group (n=390, cumulative hazard 2·39% per year) compared with 33 in the aspirin group (n=374, 9·16% per year; hazard ratio [HR] 0·29, 95% CI 0·15-0·60). In those without previous stroke or TIA, 41 events occurred in the apixaban group (n=2417, 1·68% per year) compared with 80 in the aspirin group (n=2415, 3·06% per year; HR 0·51, 95% CI 0·35-0·74). The p value for interaction of the effects of aspirin and apixaban with previous cerebrovascular events was 0·17. Major bleeding was more frequent in patients with history of stroke or TIA than in patients without (HR 2·88, 95% CI 1·77-4·55) but risk of this event did not differ between treatment groups.Interpretation In patients with atrial fibrillation, apixaban is similarly effective whether or not patients have had a previous stroke or TIA. Given that those with previous stroke or TIA have a higher risk of stroke, the absolute benefits might be greater in these patients.Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70017-0

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diener, H.-C., Eikelboom, J., Connolly, S. J., Joyner, C. D., Hart, R. G., Lip, G. Y., O'Donnell, M., Hohnloser, S. H., Hankey, G. J., Shestakovska, O., & Yusuf, S.
Affiliations
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Population Health Research Institute (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Birmingham City Hospital (GB)
  • Health Research Board (IE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
225-231
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110222797
Cited by
177
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
14.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNA. Repositorio Institucional del Sergas (Servicio Gallego de Salud (SERGAS)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
apixaban, aspirin, atrial fibrillation, stroke prevention, transient ischemic attack, stroke history, factor Xa inhibitors, major bleeding, systemic embolism, subgroup analysis, AVERROES trial, anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, risk stratification, bleeding risk stratification
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aspirin, Atrial Fibrillation, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrazoles, Pyridones, Treatment Outcome, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review