Cited by 16Epilepsy research and treatmentChronic Disease Management StrategiesStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Comorbidity as an epidemiological construct

Keezer, Mark R, Sander, Josemir W·2016·The Lancet Neurology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00352-x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keezer, M. R., & Sander, J. W.
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
32
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2214737145
Cited by
15
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
comorbidities, epilepsy, chronic disease, confounding, depression, anxiety, dementia, migraine, heart disease, peptic ulcer, arthritis, bidirectional relations, shared risk factors, screening tool
MeSH terms
Epilepsy, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review