Cited by 617Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study

Open access
Bazarian, Jeffrey J, Biberthaler, Peter, Welch, Robert D, Lewis, Lawrence M, Barzo, Pal, Bogner-Flatz, Viktoria, Gunnar Brolinson, P, Büki, Andras +16 more·2018·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background More than 50 million people worldwide sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) annually. Detection of intracranial injuries relies on head CT, which is overused and resource intensive. Blood-based brain biomarkers hold the potential to predict absence of intracranial injury and thus reduce unnecessary head CT scanning. We sought to validate a test combining ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), at predetermined cutoff values, to predict traumatic intracranial injuries on head CT scan acutely after TBI. Methods This prospective, multicentre observational trial included adults (≥18 years) presenting to participating emergency departments with suspected, non-penetrating TBI and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9-15. Patients were eligible if they had undergone head CT as part of standard emergency care and blood collection within 12 h of injury. UCH-L1 and GFAP were measured in serum and analysed using prespecified cutoff values of 327 pg/mL and 22 pg/mL, respectively. UCH-L1 and GFAP assay results were combined into a single test result that was compared with head CT results. The primary study outcomes were the sensitivity and the negative predictive value (NPV) of the test result for the detection of traumatic intracranial injury on head CT. Findings Between Dec 6, 2012, and March 20, 2014, 1977 patients were recruited, of whom 1959 had analysable data. 125 (6%) patients had CT-detected intracranial injuries and eight (<1%) had neurosurgically manageable injuries. 1288 (66%) patients had a positive UCH-L1 and GFAP test result and 671 (34%) had a negative test result. For detection of intracranial injury, the test had a sensitivity of 0·976 (95% CI 0·931-0·995) and an NPV of 0·996 (0·987-0·999). In three (<1%) of 1959 patients, the CT scan was positive when the test was negative. Interpretation These results show the high sensitivity and NPV of the UCH-L1 and GFAP test. This supports its potential clinical role for ruling out the need for a CT scan among patients with TBI presenting at emergency departments in whom a head CT is felt to be clinically indicated. Future studies to determine the value added by this biomarker test to head CT clinical decision rules could be warranted. Funding Banyan Biomarkers and US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30231-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GFAP elevations have been reported in frontotemporal dementia, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis and inflammatory central nervous system diseases.

    “For example, GFAP elevations have been reported in frontotemporal dementia39, traumatic brain injury40, multiple sclerosis41 and inflammatory central nervous system diseases42.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bazarian, J. J., Biberthaler, P., Welch, R. D., Lewis, L. M., Barzo, P., Bogner-Flatz, V., Gunnar Brolinson, P., Büki, A., Chen, J. Y., Christenson, R. H., Hack, D., Huff, J. S., Johar, S., Jordan, J. D., Leidel, B. A., Lindner, T., Ludington, E., Okonkwo, D. O., Ornato, J., Peacock, W. F., Schmidt, K., Tyndall, J. A., Vossough, A., & Jagoda, A. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Maryland Medical Center (US)
  • United States Army Medical Research and Development Command (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Mount Sinai Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Welch, Robert D
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
782-789
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883751442
Cited by
617
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 104 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 7
FWCI
34.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • BrainScope Company
  • Medical Research and Materiel Command (W81XWH-10-C-0251)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, intracranial injury, serum biomarkers, glial fibrillary acidic protein, UCHL1, blood-based biomarkers, negative predictive value, sensitivity, emergency department, diagnostic test validation, Glasgow Coma Scale
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Head, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Glasgow Coma Scale, Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed, Ubiquitin Thiolesterase, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review