Cited by 37Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Comparison of tau spread in people with Down syndrome versus autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Wisch, Julie K, McKay, Nicole S, Boerwinkle, Anna H, Kennedy, James, Flores, Shaney, Handen, Benjamin L, Christian, Bradley T, Head, Elizabeth +174 more·2024·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background In people with genetic forms of Alzheimer's disease, such as in Down syndrome and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, pathological changes specific to Alzheimer's disease (ie, accumulation of amyloid and tau) occur in the brain at a young age, when comorbidities related to ageing are not present. Studies including these cohorts could, therefore, improve our understanding of the early pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and be useful when designing preventive interventions targeted at disease pathology or when planning clinical trials. We compared the magnitude, spatial extent, and temporal ordering of tau spread in people with Down syndrome and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Methods In this cross-sectional observational study, we included participants (aged ≥25 years) from two cohort studies. First, we collected data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network studies (DIAN-OBS and DIAN-TU), which include carriers of autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease genetic mutations and non-carrier familial controls recruited in Australia, Europe, and the USA between 2008 and 2022. Second, we collected data from the Alzheimer Biomarkers Consortium–Down Syndrome study, which includes people with Down syndrome and sibling controls recruited from the UK and USA between 2015 and 2021. Controls from the two studies were combined into a single group of familial controls. All participants had completed structural MRI and tau PET ( 18 F-flortaucipir) imaging. We applied Gaussian mixture modelling to identify regions of high tau PET burden and regions with the earliest changes in tau binding for each cohort separately. We estimated regional tau PET burden as a function of cortical amyloid burden for both cohorts. Finally, we compared the temporal pattern of tau PET burden relative to that of amyloid. Findings We included 137 people with Down syndrome (mean age 38·5 years [SD 8·2], 74 [54%] male, and 63 [46%] female), 49 individuals with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease (mean age 43·9 years [11·2], 22 [45%] male, and 27 [55%] female), and 85 familial controls, pooled from across both studies (mean age 41·5 years [12·1], 28 [33%] male, and 57 [67%] female), who satisfied the PET quality-control procedure for tau-PET imaging processing. 134 (98%) people with Down syndrome, 44 (90%) with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, and 77 (91%) controls also completed an amyloid PET scan within 3 years of tau PET imaging. Spatially, tau PET burden was observed most frequently in subcortical and medial temporal regions in people with Down syndrome, and within the medial temporal lobe in people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Across the brain, people with Down syndrome had greater concentrations of tau for a given level of amyloid compared with people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Temporally, increases in tau were more strongly associated with increases in amyloid for people with Down syndrome compared with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Interpretation Although the general progression of amyloid followed by tau is similar for people Down syndrome and people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, we found subtle differences in the spatial distribution, timing, and magnitude of the tau burden between these two cohorts. These differences might have important implications; differences in the temporal pattern of tau accumulation might influence the timing of drug administration in clinical trials, whereas differences in the spatial pattern and magnitude of tau burden might affect disease progression. Funding None.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00084-x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent natural history studies have highlighted evidence of accelerated AD progression in people who have DSAD, including a more rapid development of tau spread as measured by positron emission tomography and plasma phospho-tau217, and enhanced rates of cortical thinning, after normalising for amyloid-β accumulation.

    “Recent natural history studies comparing the development of AD in the general population and DSAD have highlighted evidence of accelerated AD progression in people who have DSAD. This includes a more rapid development of tau spread as measured by positron emission tomography and plasma phospho-tau217 [60, 68, 72], and enhanced rates of cortical thinning [37], after normalising for amyloid-β accum”

    From Apolipoprotein E abundance is elevated in the brains of individuals with Down syndrome–Alzheimer’s disease (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wisch, J. K., McKay, N. S., Boerwinkle, A. H., Kennedy, J., Flores, S., Handen, B. L., Christian, B. T., Head, E., Mapstone, M., Rafii, M. S., O’Bryant, S. E., Price, J. C., Laymon, C. M., Krinsky-McHale, S. J., Lai, F., Rosas, H. D., Hartley, S. L., Zaman, S., Lott, I. T., Tudorascu, D., Zammit, M., Brickman, A. M., Lee, J. H., Bird, T. D., Cohen, A., Chrem, P., Daniels, A., Chhatwal, J. P., Cruchaga, C., Ibanez, L., Jucker, M., Karch, C. M., Day, G. S., Lee, J.-H., Levin, J., Llibre-Guerra, J., Li, Y., Lopera, F., Roh, J. H., Ringman, J. M., Supnet-Bell, C., van Dyck, C. H., Xiong, C., Wang, G., Morris, J. C., McDade, E., Bateman, R. J., Benzinger, T. L. S., Gordon, B. A., Ances, B. M., Aizenstein, H. J., Andrews, H. F., Bell, K., Birn, R. M., Bulova, P., Cheema, A., Chen, K., Clare, I., Clark, L., Cohen, A. D., Constantino, J. N., Doran, E. W., Feingold, E., Foroud, T. M., Hartley, S. L., Hom, C., Honig, L., Ikonomovic, M. D., Johnson, S. C., Jordan, C., Kamboh, M. I., Keator, D., Klunk, W. E., Kofler, J. K., Kreisl, W. C., Krinsky-McHale, S. J., Lao, P., Laymon, C., Lott, I. T., Lupson, V., Mathis, C. A., Minhas, D. S., Nadkarni, N., Pang, D., Petersen, M., Price, J. C., Pulsifer, M., Reiman, E., Rizvi, B., Sabbagh, M. N., Schupf, N., Tudorascu, D. L., Tumuluru, R., Tycko, B., Varadarajan, B., White, D. A., Yassa, M. A., Zaman, S., Zhang, F., Bateman, R., Daniels, A. J., Courtney, L., McDade, E., Llibre-Guerra, J. J., Supnet-Bell, C., Xiong, C., Xu, X., Lu, R., Wang, G., Li, Y., Gremminger, E., Perrin, R. J., Franklin, E., Ibanez, L., Jerome, G., Herries, E., Stauber, J., Baker, B., Minton, M., Cruchaga, C., Goate, A. M., Renton, A. E., Picarello, D. M., Benzinger, T., Gordon, B. A., Hornbeck, R., Hassenstab, J., Smith, J., Stout, S., Aschenbrenner, A. J., Karch, C. M., Marsh, J., Morris, J. C., Holtzman, D. M., Barthelemy, N., Xu, J., Noble, J. M., Berman, S. B., Ikonomovic, S., Nadkarni, N. K., Day, G., Graff-Radford, N. R., Farlow, M., Chhatwal, J. P., Ikeuchi, T., Kasuga, K., Niimi, Y., Huey, E. D., Salloway, S., Schofield, P. R., Brooks, W. S., Bechara, J. A., Martins, R., Fox, N. C., Cash, D. M., Ryan, N. S., Jucker, M., Laske, C., Hofmann, A., Kuder-Buletta, E., Graber-Sultan, S., Obermueller, U., Levin, J., Roedenbeck, Y., Vöglein, J., Lee, J.-H., Roh, J. H., Sanchez-Valle, R., Rosa-Neto, P., Allegri, R. F., Chrem Mendez, P., Surace, E., Vazquez, S., Lopera, F., Leon, Y. M., Ramirez, L., Aguillon, D., Levey, A. I., Johnson, E. C. B., Seyfried, N. T., Ringman, J., & Mori, H.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
  • Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
  • University of Ulsan (KR)
Corresponding author
Wisch, Julie K
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
500-510
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394800620
Cited by
37
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2025-05-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Conicet (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
  • Repositorio Digital - Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
Down syndrome, autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease, tau spread, tau PET, amyloid PET, medial temporal lobe, subcortical structures
MeSH terms
Adult, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Cross-Sectional Studies, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review