Cited by 7Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Decoding brain structure to stage Alzheimer's disease pathology in Down syndrome

Open access
Kennedy, James T., Wisch, Julie K., Dincer, Aylin, Roman, June, Gordon, Brian A., Handen, Benjamin, Benzinger, Tammie L. S., Head, Elizabeth +10 more·2025·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Down syndrome (DS) is associated with changes in brain structure. It is unknown if thickness and volumetric changes can identify AD stages and if they are similar to other genetic forms of AD. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging scans were collected for 178 DS adults (106 nonclinical, 45 preclinical, and 27 symptomatic). Cortical thickness and subcortical volumes were compared between DS groups and evaluated as a staging metric using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Thickness patterns were compared to those previously reported in autosomal‐dominant AD (ADAD). RESULTS: Decreased parietal and temporal lobe thickness differentiated amyloid positivity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.83) and impairment (AUC = 0.81), and slightly outperformed subcortical volumes (AUC = 0.8/0.74). Thickness differences in DS were more widespread, severe, and had better discriminative ability than ADAD. DISCUSSION: Cortical thickness can stage AD pathology in DS. Identification of brain regions affected by AD may aid in tracking disease course and evaluating treatment effects. Highlights: DSAD is associated with reduced temporal and parietal cortical thickness. DSAD is associated with smaller hippocampal and striatal volumes. Thickness differences can stage DSAD better than other forms of AD. DSAD thickness differences are more extensive and severe than ADAD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.14519

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent natural history studies have highlighted evidence of accelerated AD progression in people who have DSAD, including a more rapid development of tau spread as measured by positron emission tomography and plasma phospho-tau217, and enhanced rates of cortical thinning, after normalising for amyloid-β accumulation.

    “Recent natural history studies comparing the development of AD in the general population and DSAD have highlighted evidence of accelerated AD progression in people who have DSAD. This includes a more rapid development of tau spread as measured by positron emission tomography and plasma phospho-tau217 [60, 68, 72], and enhanced rates of cortical thinning [37], after normalising for amyloid-β accum”

    From Apolipoprotein E abundance is elevated in the brains of individuals with Down syndrome–Alzheimer’s disease (2025) · cites this paper as [37]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, J. T., Wisch, J. K., Dincer, A., Roman, J., Gordon, B. A., Handen, B., Benzinger, T. L. S., Head, E., Mapstone, M., Christian, B. T., Tudorascu, D. L., Laymon, C. L., Hartley, S. L., Lao, P., Brickman, A. M., Zaman, S. H., Ances, B. M., & Consortia, T. A. A. D.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Department of Radiology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Ances, Beau M.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-01-14
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
e14519-e14519
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W4406372877
Cited by
7
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Handicapped Research (NIHR203312)
  • National Institute on Aging (U19AG068054, U19AG032438)
  • Alzheimer's Association (SG‐20‐690363‐DIAN)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  • Korea Health Industry Development Institute
  • Korea Display Research Corporation (HI21C0066)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Down syndrome, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review