Cited by 294Land Rights and ReformsAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentAgricultural economics and policies

Chapter 42 Power, distortions, revolt and reform in agricultural land relations

Binswanger, Hans P., Deininger, Klaus, Feder, Gershon·1995·Handbook of Development Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1573-4471(95)30019-8

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Binswanger, H. P., Deininger, K., & Feder, G.
Affiliations
World Bank (US)
Venue
Handbook of Development Economics
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1995
Pages
2659-2772
ISSN
1573-4471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1214254180
Cited by
294
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.96
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Handbook of development economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
land tenure, land market, land lease, land sale, farm size, agricultural productivity, family labor, employed workers, land concentration, land rights, power relations, land reform, land policy, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review