The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crop production and resource use to meet the growing demand for food, feed and fuel: opportunities and constraints
Open accessAbstract
Global food and feed demands have been projected to double in the 21st century, which will further increase the pressure on the use of land, water and nutrients. At the same time, the political decisions to support renewable energy sources are accelerating the use of biomass, including grain, sugar, oilseed, and lignocellulosic crops for biofuel and power generation. Government directives — incited by climate change, high oil prices and geo-political tensions — promote partial replacement of fossil fuel by biofuels. Prices and availability of commodities used as staple food and feed are becoming already affected by the growing demand for bioenergy. Many implications of this demand for biofuel on the resource base (land, water, biodiversity), environment, rural economy, food prices and social impacts are unknown. The present study reviews and discusses the opportunities and limits of crops and resources for food, feed and biofuel production. There are gaps in our knowledge regarding the global capacity for sustainable plant-based bioenergy production, while maintaining food security; commercial biomass production will compete with food crops for arable land and scarce fresh water resources. The rapidly growing demand for food, feed and fuel will require a combination of further increases in crop yields (ca. 2% per annum) and a doubling or tripling of resource-use efficiencies, especially of nitrogen-use efficiency and water productivity in production systems with high external inputs, over the next 20 to 30 years. Adaptation of cropping systems to climate change and a better tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses by genetic improvement and by managing diverse cropping systems in a sustainable way will be of key importance. An integrated assessment of resource-use efficiencies, ecological services and economic profitability may guide the choice of crop species and cultivars to be grown in a target environment and region, depending on the added value for specific purposes: food, feed or fuel. To avoid negative impacts on food security, governments should give high priority to 2nd, 3rd and 4th generation technologies for bioenergy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151861 · Cited by 4,888
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484
Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel projections
Demirbas, A. (2008) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2008.02.020 · Cited by 1,284
Rapid urbanization in China: A real challenge to soil protection and food security
Chen, J. (2007) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.04.019 · Cited by 922
Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil
Fearnside, P. M. (2001) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892901000030 · Cited by 702
Opportunities for renewable bioenergy using microorganisms
Rittmann, B. E. (2008) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.21875 · Cited by 651
Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge
Karp, A., & Shield, I. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02432.x · Cited by 509
Cited by
Suganya, T., Varman, M., Masjuki, H. H., & Renganathan, S. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.026 · Cited by 793
Why are wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France
Brisson, N., Gate, P., Gouache, D., Charmet, G., Oury, F.-X., & Huard, F. (2010) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.012 · Cited by 767
Renewable fuels from algae: An answer to debatable land based fuels
Singh, A., Nigam, P. S., & Murphy, J. D. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.032 · Cited by 664
Zabel, F., Putzenlechner, B., & Mauser, W. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107522 · Cited by 417
Environmental assessment of enzyme use in industrial production – a literature review
Jegannathan, K. R., & Nielsen, P. H. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.005 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiertz, J. H. J., & Ewert, F.
- Venue
- NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 281-300
- ISSN
- 1573-5214 (ISSN-L)
- 2212-1307
- OpenAlex
- W2078501764
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crop production and resource use to meet the growing demand for food, feed and fuel: opportunities and constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1573-5214(09)80001-8
- The paper
- Spiertz, J. H. J., & Ewert, F. (2009). Crop production and resource use to meet the growing demand for food, feed and fuel: opportunities and constraints. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-5214(09)80001-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.