Cited by 5Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Pharmacokinetic modeling of the glucoregulatory system

Open access
Farmer, T.G., Edgar, T.F., Peppas, N.A.·2008·Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology

Abstract

A pharmacokinetic model is proposed to describe the glucoregulatory process. The model describes the dynamics of glucose, amino acids, and fatty acids, as well as both the hormonal actions and dynamics of insulin, glucagon, epinephrine, and glucagon-like peptide-one. The model was developed assuming that the dynamics of each species occurrs in only one compartment. Several forms of the metabolic absorption and elimination rates, along with possibilities for increasing the complexity of each compartmental model are discussed. Once properly identified and validated, the novel model has the potential to be more descriptive than other models describing glucose dynamics in the body

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper proposes a pharmacokinetic framework for the glucoregulatory system that includes glucose, amino acids, fatty acids, insulin, glucagon, epinephrine, and GLP-1. It is a model-development and discussion paper rather than an empirical validation study.

Key findings

  • A single-compartment pharmacokinetic model is outlined for each species, with endogenous and exogenous inputs and elimination/uptake terms written as general functions of interacting metabolites and hormones.
  • The authors discuss likely refinements, including two compartments for glucose, amino acids, and fatty acids, multiple compartments for insulin and glucagon, and additional action compartments for epinephrine and GLP-1.
  • GLP-1 is noted as accounting for more than 70% of the incretin effect, with GIP and other hormones making up the remainder; the model lumps GLP-1 and GIP together for simplicity.
  • The model is presented as potentially more descriptive than existing glucose-dynamics models once identified and validated, but no validation results are reported.

Methods

  • Conceptual pharmacokinetic model development based on physiological literature, compartment diagrams, and mass-balance-style differential equations for each species.
  • Each species is initially assumed to reside in one compartment, with dynamic change described as a function of endogenous production, exogenous input, and uptake or elimination.
  • The paper discusses possible kinetic forms for source and sink terms, including first-order, Michaelis-Menten, additive, multiplicative basal-rate, and receptor-binding descriptions; no data fitting or parameter estimation is performed.

Limitations

  • The authors state that model identification and validation were outside the scope of the work because of the model size and lack of appropriate data.
  • The authors state that the exact forms of the metabolic source and sink terms could not be determined without data.
  • Evident from the text: the model is not tested against patient or animal data, no parameter values are estimated, and several simplifying assumptions—such as single compartments and lumping epinephrine/norepinephrine and GLP-1/GIP—may limit accuracy.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1773-2247(08)50076-1

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 18 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Multiple compartments provide the best model for insulin.

    “Many authors [13, 14] have demonstrated that insulin is best modeled using multiple compartments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [14] source
  • Premisecitation

    A two-compartment representation is more accurate for glucose.

    “As both Hovorka et al. [11] and Cobelli et al. [12] have shown, glucose is more accurately represented as having two compartments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hovorka et al. [11]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Cobelli et al. [12]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    GLP-1 contributes over 70% of the total incretin effect, with GIP providing the remainder and other hormones a minimal part.

    “GLP-1 accounts for more than 70% of the total incretin effect, with the remaining effect caused by gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and a minimal effect from other hormones.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    Epinephrine released to restore falling glucose inhibits insulin secretion.

    “Finally, epinephrine, when produced at levels to restore falling glucose levels, is able to inhibit insulin secretion [9].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    When a pharmacokinetic model fails to match data, its structure is altered by adding compartments or changing the mathematical form of kinetic rates.

    “When the model does not match the data, the model structure is changed by either increasing the number of compartments used or by changing the mathematical description of the kinetic rates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because simulations can quickly show system responses across many design configurations and scenarios, using them before experiments is highly effective for improving design.

    “In addition to these two primary advantages, the ability of simulations to show the system response for a large number of design configurations and scenarios in a relatively short amount of time demonstrates that, at the very least, the use of simulations as a precursor to experiments is a highly effective way to improve the design process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Detailed models can greatly improve the development of novel medical therapeutic systems.

    “The development of novel medical therapeutic systems can be greatly improved using detailed models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    GLP-1 is one of several gastrointestinal hormones that produce the incretin effect of raising insulin secretion.

    “To be more accurate, GLP-1 is actually a part of many gastrointestinal hormones responsible for what it known as the incretin effect of increasing insulin secretion [15].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior modeling has concentrated mainly on insulin and glucose, with some models covering glucagon and fatty acids.

    “Previous modeling work has focused mostly on insulin and glucose modeling, while some models do exist that describe glucagon [2–4], and fatty acids [4, 5].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [2]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [3] source
    • cites [4] source
    • cites [5] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gastrointestinal hormones including GLP-1 raise insulin production, and amino acids enhance insulin secretion.

    “In addition, insulin production is increased by an increase in gastrointestinal hormones, including glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and amino acids are known to have a potentiating effect on insulin secretion [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Insulin inhibits glucagon secretion because glucagon-producing alpha cells lie downstream of insulin-producing beta cells.

    “Because the glucagon-producing alpha cells are downstream of the insulin-producing beta cells, the presence of insulin is also able to inhibit glucagon secretion [9].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Absorption and elimination kinetics are most often modeled as first order.

    “Elimination and absorption kinetics are most often described by first order kinetics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A single compartment representing the circulation is often selected in pharmacokinetic models.

    “Often a single compartment representing the circulation is chosen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Model identification and validation were outside the scope of this work due to the size of the models and lack of appropriate data.

    “However, given the size of the models, with respect to equations and model parameters, and the lack of appropriate data, it was decided that model identification and validation was outside the scope of this work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The metabolic source and sink terms were left general because their exact form could not be determined without data.

    “The metabolic source and sink terms were left in a general form. Without data, the exact form of the terms could not be determined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Physiologically-based models can simulate and support model-based control because they describe each species thoroughly.

    “The physiologically-based model has the potential to simulate and to be used in model-based control methods, as a result of its thorough description of each species in the body.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Simulation can rapidly identify ineffective device design features, preventing catastrophic outcomes including death.

    “Second, a simulation can quickly reveal device design characteristics that will not be effective, preventing any catastrophic results from occurring, including the loss of lives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Physiologically-based models require major organ tissues to be well-mixed compartments with uniform species concentration.

    “Physiologically-based models [2] require that most significant organ tissues are chosen as well-mixed compartments and the concentration of species is uniform within that compartment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A pharmacokinetic model describes absorption and elimination kinetics of a species across a given number of theoretical compartments.

    “Among patient models, the pharmacokinetic model [1] simply describes the kinetics of absorption and elimination of a species for a certain number of theoretical compartments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Simulation is much cheaper than testing in patients and animals in money and time for approval, protocol development, and experimental setup and performance.

    “First, the use of simulation is a significantly cheaper alternative to testing in patients and animals, both in terms of dollars spent and time spent in gaining approval for such experiments, the development of experimental protocols, and experimental setup and performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pharmacokinetic models are easier to use than physiologically-based models because their parameters are easier to estimate, though they may describe metabolism less accurately.

    “However, because there are so many parameters to be identified with such a large model, the pharmacokinetic models have the advantage that, while perhaps not describing metabolism as accurately as the physiologically-based models, an estimate of the model parameters is easier to obtain, thus making them easier to use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
16 of 16
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Each species is assumed to have dynamics confined to a single compartment.

    “The model was developed assuming that the dynamics of each species occurrs in only one compartment.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The rate of change of a species' concentration in a constant-volume compartment is assumed to depend on endogenous and exogenous inputs and on uptake or elimination.

    “For each species, the dynamic change of species concentration within the constant volume compartment was assumed to be a function of both endogenous and exogenous inputs and uptake or elimination.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Each species is initially assumed to be best represented by a single compartment.

    “To develop the pharmacokinetic framework, each species was initially assumed to be best described as existing in a single compartment.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Endogenous glucose production and uptake are assumed to depend on glucose, insulin, glucagon, epinephrine, amino acids, fatty acids, and glycogen.

    “Endogenous glucose production and uptake were assumed to be functions of glucose, insulin, glucagon, and epinephrine, as well as amino acids, fatty acids, and glycogen.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Exogenous glucose is assumed to depend on the source, including the amount administered and its absorption kinetics.

    “Exogenous glucose was considered a function of the source, including the amount given and the particular absorption kinetics associated with the source.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Fatty acid production is assumed to depend on glucose, insulin, glucagon, and epinephrine.

    “Fatty acid production was assumed to be a function of glucose, insulin, glucagon, and epinephrine.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The exogenous fatty acid source is assumed to depend on source type and amount delivered.

    “Like glucose and amino acids, the exogenous source of fatty acids was assumed to depend on the source type and the amount of fatty acid delivered.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Insulin is assumed to arise either from endogenous pancreatic production or from an external source.

    “Insulin was assumed to appear either through endogenous production from the pancreas or from an external source.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Insulin is assumed to be degraded mainly at binding sites and the kidneys.

    “It was assumed to be degraded primarily at the binding sites and at the kidneys.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Insulin uptake is assumed to depend only on insulin concentration and kinetic rates.

    “Uptake was assumed to occur only as a function of the insulin concentration and the kinetic rates.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Glucagon is assumed to appear only endogenously.

    “Glucagon was assumed to appear only endogenously, although the idea of exogenous glucagon infusion is gaining acceptance [10].”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Glucagon elimination is assumed to occur at liver cell binding sites and the kidneys.

    “Glucagon elimination was assumed to occur at the liver cell binding sites and the kidneys.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Endogenous glucagon production is assumed to depend on glucose, insulin, amino acids, and epinephrine.

    “Endogenous glucagon production was modeled as a function of glucose, insulin, amino acids, and epinephrine.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Glucagon elimination is assumed to depend only on glucagon levels.

    “Glucagon elimination was assumed to occur as a function only of glucagon levels.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In exercise or hypoglycemia, epinephrine appearance is assumed to be endogenous only, and its disappearance is assumed to occur by degradation.

    “The appearance of epinephrine in these circumstances was assumed to occur endogenously only, and disappearance was assumed to occur via degradation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Epinephrine secretion for glucose regulation is assumed to depend on glucose and glucagon levels.

    “Epinephrine secretion for the purpose of glucose regulation was modeled as a function of both glucose and glucagon levels.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Epinephrine elimination is assumed to depend only on epinephrine levels.

    “Like the other hormones previously mentioned, epinephrine elimination was assumed to be a function only of the epinephrine levels.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    GLP-1 appearance is assumed to occur only endogenously.

    “GLP-1 is secreted only in response to a meal, and as such it was assumed that its appearance only occurs endogenously.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    GLP-1 elimination is assumed to depend only on GLP-1.

    “Elimination was assumed to be a function only of GLP-1.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Glucagon is assumed to exist in only one compartment.

    “Glucagon was assumed to exist in only a single compartment.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The epinephrine/norepinephrine complex is treated as a single hormone.

    “However, because most norepinephrine is converted to epinephrine, and because most of the effects mentioned are in response to the sympathetic nervous system responses to low glucose, the epinephrine/norepinephrine complex is simply being lumped together as a single hormone.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    GLP-1 and GIP are lumped together for simplicity.

    “For simplicity the two have been lumped together, as both are generated in response to a meal and both act to increase insulin production.”
22 of 22

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Glucose uptake equation omits several stated dependencies

    Minor

    The text says glucose uptake depends on glucagon, amino acids, fatty acids, and glycogen, but the glucose elimination equation includes none of them as arguments.

  • Fatty acid elimination equation omits glucagon

    Minor

    The discussion says glucagon increases fatty acid elimination and that the elimination rate was modeled using the relevant hormones. The stated rate function includes insulin and epinephrine but not glucagon.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farmer, T. G., Edgar, T. F., & Peppas, N. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Peppas, N.A.
Venue
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
387-391
ISSN
1773-2247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965980276
Cited by
5
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01eb000246-20)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01-EB000246)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
glucoregulation, glucose dynamics, pharmacokinetic modeling, insulin, glucagon, epinephrine, glucagon-like peptide-1, amino acids, fatty acids, compartmental model, hormonal regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review