The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The status and distribution characteristics of residual mulching film in Xinjiang, China
Open accessAbstract
Pollution of residual plastic film in arable lands is a severe problem in China. In this study, the status of residual film and influential factors were investigated using the methods of farm survey in combination with questionnaires and quadrat sampling at a large number of field sites in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. The results showed that the amount of film utilization increased largely and reached to 1.8×105 t in 2013. Similarly, the mulching area also substantially increased in recent decades, and reached to 2.7×105 ha in the same year. According to the current survey, 60.7% of the sites presented a greater mulch residue than the national film residue standard (75 kg ha−1), and the maximum residual amount reached 502.2 kg ha−1 in Turpan, Xinjiang. The film thickness, the mulching time and the crop type all influenced mulch residue. The thickness of the film had significantly negative correlation with the amount of residual film (P<0.05), while the mulching years had significantly positive correlation with it (P<0.05). The total amount of residual film in Xinjiang was 3.43×105 t in 2011, which accounted for 15.3% of the cumulative dosage of mulching. Among all the crops, the cotton fields had the largest residual amount of mulch film (158.4 kg ha−1), and also the largest contribution (2.6×105 tons) to the total amount of residual film in Xinjiang.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Briassoulis, D., Babou, E., Hiskakis, M., & Kyrikou, I. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3464-9 · Cited by 162
Cited by
Single-use plastics: Production, usage, disposal, and adverse impacts
Chen, Y., Awasthi, A. K., Wei, F., Tan, Q., & Li, J. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141772 · Cited by 716
In Situ degradation of biodegradable plastic mulch films in compost and agricultural soils
Sintim, H. Y., Bary, A. I., Hayes, D. G., Wadsworth, L. C., Anunciado, M. B., English, M. E., Bandopadhyay, S., Schaeffer, S. M., DeBruyn, J. M., Miles, C. A., et al. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138668 · Cited by 377
Sander, M. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05208 · Cited by 319
Akinwumi, I., Soladoye, O., Ajayi, V., & Epelle, P. (2022) · Infrastructures · doi:10.3390/infrastructures7120172 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- ZHANG, D., LIU, H.-B., HU, W.-L., QIN, X.-H., MA, X.-W., YAN, C.-R., & WANG, H.-Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Integrative Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2639-2646
- ISSN
- 2095-3119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2340736115
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The status and distribution characteristics of residual mulching film in Xinjiang, China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61240-0
- The paper
- ZHANG, D., LIU, H.-B., HU, W.-L., QIN, X.-H., MA, X.-W., YAN, C.-R., & WANG, H.-Y. (2016). The status and distribution characteristics of residual mulching film in Xinjiang, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61240-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.