Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Palliative care in interstitial lung disease: living well

Open access
Kreuter, Michael, Bendstrup, Elisabeth, Russell, Anne-Marie, Bajwah, Sabrina, Lindell, Kathleen, Adir, Yochai, Brown, Crystal E, Calligaro, Greg, Cassidy, Nicola, Corte, Tamera J, Geissler, Klaus, Hassan, Azza Adel, Johannson, Kerri A, Kairalla, Ronaldo, Kolb, Martin, Kondoh, Yasuhiro, Quadrelli, Sylvia, Swigris, Jeff, Udwadia, Zarir, Wells, Athol, Wijsenbeek, Marlies·2017·The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30383-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are characterised by major reductions in quality of life and survival and have similarities to certain malignancies. However, palliative care expertise is conspicuously inaccessible to many patients with ILD. Unmet patient and caregiver needs include effective pharmacological and psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life throughout the disease course, sensitive advanced care planning, and timely patient-centred end-of-life care. The incorrect perception that palliative care is synonymous with end-of-life care, with no role earlier in the course of ILD, has created a culture of neglect. Interventions that aim to improve life expectancy are often prioritised without rigorous assessment of the individual's health and psychosocial needs, thereby inadvertently reducing quality of life. As in malignant disorders, radical interventions to slow disease progression and palliative measures to improve quality of life should both be prioritised. Efficient patient-centred models of palliative care must be validated, taking into account religious and cultural differences, as well as variability of resources. Effective implementation of palliative care for ILD will require multidisciplinary participation from clinicians, specialist nurses, psychologists, social workers, and, in some countries, non-governmental faith and community-based organisations with access to palliative care expertise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30383-1

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 107 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Kreuter, M., Bendstrup, E., Russell, A.-M., Bajwah, S., Lindell, K., Adir, Y., Brown, C. E., Calligaro, G., Cassidy, N., Corte, T. J., Geissler, K., Hassan, A. A., Johannson, K. A., Kairalla, R., Kolb, M., Kondoh, Y., Quadrelli, S., Swigris, J., Udwadia, Z., Wells, A., & Wijsenbeek, M.
Venue
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
968-980
ISSN
2213-2600 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30383-1
OpenAlex
W2761585057
Cited by
264
References
107
FWCI
20.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Palliative care in interstitial lung disease: living well. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30383-1
The paper
Kreuter, M., Bendstrup, E., Russell, A.-M., Bajwah, S., Lindell, K., Adir, Y., Brown, C. E., Calligaro, G., Cassidy, N., Corte, T. J., Geissler, K., Hassan, A. A., Johannson, K. A., Kairalla, R., Kolb, M., Kondoh, Y., Quadrelli, S., Swigris, J., Udwadia, Z., . . . Wijsenbeek, M. (2017). Palliative care in interstitial lung disease: living well. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30383-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.