Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,683

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A Simple Method for the Assessment of Palliative Care Patients

Bruera, Eduardo, Kuehn, Norma, Miller, Melvin J., Selmser, Pal, Macmillan, Karen·1991·Journal of Palliative Care

Abstract

We describe a simple method for the assessment of symptoms twice a day in patients admitted to a palliative care unit. Eight visual analog scales (VAS) 0–100 mm are completed either by the patient alone, by the patient with nurse's assistance, or by the nurses or relatives at 10:00 and 18:00 hours, in order to indicate the levels of pain, activity, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, and sensation of well-being. The information is then transferred to a graph that contains the assessments of up to 21 days on each page. The sum of the scores for all symptoms is defined as the symptom distress score. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) was carried out for 101 consecutive patients for the length of their admission to our unit. Of these, 84% were able to make their own assessment sometime during their admission. However, before death 83% of assessments were completed by a nurse or relative. Mean symptom distress score was 410±95 during day 1 of the admission, versus 362±83 during day 5 (p<0.01). Mean symptom distress scores throughout the hospitalization were 359±105, 374±93, 359±91 and 406±81 when the ESAS was completed by the patient alone, patient with nurse's assistance (p=N.S.), nurse alone (p=N.S.), or relative (p<0.01) respectively. We conclude that this is a simple and useful method for the regular assessment of symptom distress in the palliative care setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/082585979100700202

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1016/0885-3924(88)90132-7 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90169-3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0885-3924(90)90027-H · DOI · Paper page
  4. 1984, Health and Welfare Canada
  5. Cleeland C., 1990, Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, 16, 47
  6. 10.1300/J077v08n02_03 · doi:10.1300/j077v08n02_03
  7. 10.1016/0885-3924(89)90044-4 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)92112-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Reading A., 1989, Textbook of Pain, 269
  11. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Chicago: McGraw-Hill, 1986.
  12. TwycrossR, LackS. Symptom control in far advanced cancer: Vol. 1, Pain Relief. New York: Pittman, 1983: 190–199.

Cited by

See all 2,683

Metadata

Authors
Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Care
Published
1991-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
6-9
ISSN
  • 0825-8597 (ISSN-L)
  • 2369-5293
OpenAlex
W1608689417
Cited by
2,683
References
1
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A Simple Method for the Assessment of Palliative Care Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/082585979100700202
The paper
Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A Simple Method for the Assessment of Palliative Care Patients. Journal of Palliative Care. https://doi.org/10.1177/082585979100700202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.