Cited by 125Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Statin use before diabetes diagnosis and risk of microvascular disease: a nationwide nested matched study

Open access
Nielsen, Sune F, Nordestgaard, Børge G·2014·The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

Abstract

Background The role of statins in the development of microvascular disease in patients with diabetes is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that statin use increases the risk of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy, and gangrene of the foot in individuals with diabetes.Methods We identified all patients living in Denmark who were aged 40 years or older and were diagnosed with incident diabetes between Jan 1, 1996, and Dec 31, 2009. We obtained patients' data from the Danish Patient Registry and information on drug use from the Danish Registry of Medicinal Product Statistics. We randomly selected 15,679 individuals from the database who had used statins regularly until their diagnosis of diabetes (statin users) and matched them in a 1:3 ratio with 47,037 individuals who had never used statins before diagnosis (non-statin users). Our primary outcome was to compare the cumulative incidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy, or gangrene of the foot in statin users versus non-statin users. We analysed data with Cox regression models, adjusted for covariates including sex, age at diabetes diagnosis, and method of diabetes diagnosis. To address potential biases between statin users and non-statin users, we made adjustments to our analysis with a propensity score and with other factors. Median follow-up was 2·7 years (range 0-13).Findings During 215,725 person-years of follow-up, 2866 patients developed diabetic retinopathy, 1406 developed diabetic neuropathy, 1248 developed diabetic nephropathy, and 2392 developed gangrene of the foot. Compared with non-statin users, statin users had a lower cumulative incidence of diabetic retinopathy (hazard ratio 0·60, 95% CI 0·54-0·66; p<0·0001), diabetic neuropathy (0·66, 0·57-0·75; p<0·0001), and gangrene of the foot (0·88, 0·80-0·97; p=0·010), but not diabetic nephropathy (0·97, 0·85-1·10; p=0·62). These results were similar after adjusting for the competing risk of death, after matching for a propensity score, after adjusting for visits to a family doctor, and by stratification on covariates. The corresponding multivariable adjusted hazard ratio for risk of diabetes in the total population was 1·17 (95% CI 1·14-1·21; p<0·0001).Interpretation Use of statins before diagnosis of incident diabetes was not associated with an increased risk of microvascular disease. Whether statins are protective against some forms of microvascular disease-a possibility raised by these data-will need to be addressed in other studies similar to ours, in mendelian randomisation studies, and preferably in randomised controlled trials.Funding Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(14)70173-1

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nielsen, S. F., & Nordestgaard, B. G.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Nordestgaard, Børge G
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
894-900
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133266285
Cited by
125
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
statins, diabetes mellitus, diabetic microangiopathy, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic nephropathy, diabetic foot gangrene, statin safety, new-onset diabetes, propensity score matching, competing risk of death
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetic Nephropathies, Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Foot, Gangrene, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Incidence, Case-Control Studies, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review