LeucoPatch system for the management of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers in the UK, Denmark, and Sweden: an observer-masked, randomised controlled trial.
Abstract
Background The LeucoPatch device uses bedside centrifugation without additional reagents to generate a disc comprising autologous leucocytes, platelets, and fibrin, which is applied to the surface of the wound. We aimed to test the effectiveness of LeucoPatch on the healing of hard-to-heal foot ulcers in people with diabetes.Methods This was a multicentre, international, observer-masked, randomised controlled trial of people with diabetes and a hard-to-heal foot ulcer done in 32 specialist diabetic foot clinics in three countries (UK, Denmark, and Sweden). After a 4-week run-in period, those with a reduction in ulcer area of less than 50% were randomly allocated (1:1) by computer-generated, web-based randomisation (block sizes of two, four, and six) to either prespecified good standard care alone or care plus weekly application of LeucoPatch. The primary outcome was the proportion of ulcers that healed within 20 weeks assessed in the intention-to-treat population (all participants with post-randomisation data collected), defined as complete epithelialisation (confirmed by an observer who was masked to randomisation group), and remained healed for 4 weeks. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number 27665670, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02224742.Findings Between Aug 30, 2013, and May 3, 2017, 269 participants were randomly allocated to receive treatment (137 to receive standard care and 132 to receive LeucoPatch). The mean age was 61·9 years (SD 11·6), 217 (82%) were men, and 222 (83%) had type 2 diabetes. In the LeucoPatch group, 45 (34%) of 132 ulcers healed within 20 weeks versus 29 (22%) of 134 ulcers in the standard care group (odds ratio 1·58, 96% CI 1·04-2·40; p=0·0235) by intention-to-treat analysis. Time to healing was shorter in the LeucoPatch group (p=0·0246) than in the standard care group. No difference in adverse events was seen between the groups. The most common serious adverse event (SAE) was diabetic foot infection (24 events in the LeucoPatch group [24% of all SAEs] and 20 in the standard care group [27% of all SAEs]. There were no device-related adverse events.Interpretation The use of LeucoPatch is associated with significant enhancement of healing of hard-to-heal foot ulcers in people with diabetes.Funding Reapplix ApS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pooled data from 14 randomized clinical trials (1083 patients) showed that nonremovable devices were associated with improved healing compared with removable devices (81.9% vs 66.1%; RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09-1.41).
“Pooled data from 14 randomized clinical trials (1083 patients) showed that nonremovable devices were associated with improved healing compared with removable devices (81.9% vs 66.1%; RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09-1.41;P = .001).58”
From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAchilles tendon lengthening may reduce risk of ulcer recurrence (RR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4-8.2) for plantar forefoot ulcers.
“Achilles tendon lengthening may reduce risk of ulcer recurrence (RR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4-8.2[absoluterates not provided]) for plantar forefootulcers.51,58”
From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
The Background (p. 6) mentions new ulceration after healing, but does not link recurrence to Achilles tendon lengthening. The Outcomes (p. 10) and Results (p. 13) concern healing with LeucoPatch, not the claimed procedure or RR. Searches for Achilles tendon lengthening, plantar forefoot ulcers, and the stated RR and confidence interval found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence
Armstrong, D. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1615439 · Cited by 4,376 · see citing works
The global burden of diabetic foot disease
Boulton, A. J. M., Vileikytė, L., Tennvall, G. R., & Apelqvist, J. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67698-2 · Cited by 2,578 · see citing works
Lipsky, B. A., Berendt, A. R., Cornia, P. B., Pile, J. C., Peters, E. J. G., Armstrong, D. G., Deery, H. G., Embil, J. M., Joseph, W. S., Karchmer, A. W., et al. (2012) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cis346 · Cited by 1,771 · see citing works
Driver, V. R., Hanft, J. R., Fylling, C. P., & Beriou, J. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Edmonds, M., Lázaro-Martínez, J. L., Alfayate-García, J. M., Martini, J., Petit, J.-M., Rayman, G., Lobmann, R., Uccioli, L., Sauvadet, A., Bohbot, S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30438-2 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Self-citationRole of Platelets and Fibrin in the Healing Sequence
Knighton, D. R., Hunt, T. K., Thakral, K. K., & Goodson, W. H. (1982) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-198210000-00001 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Game, F. L., Apelqvist, J., Attinger, C. E., Hartemann, A., Hinchliffe, R. J., Löndahl, M., Price, P., Jeffcoate, W. J., & on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) (2015) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.2707 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Self-citationJeffcoate, W. J., Bus, S. A., Game, F. L., Hinchliffe, R. J., Price, P., & Schaper, N. C. (2016) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(16)30012-2 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationPlatelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Clean Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Ahmed, M. A., Reffat, S. A., Hassan, A. M., & Eskander, F. (2016) · Annals of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2016.04.023 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Evidence on the use of platelet-rich plasma for diabetic ulcer: A systematic review
Villela, D. L., & Santos, V. L. C. D. G. (2009) · Growth Factors · doi:10.3109/08977190903468185 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Picard, F., Hersant, B., Bosc, R., & Meningaud, J. (2015) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12317 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Coerper, S., Beckert, S., Küper, M. A., et al. (2008) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.001 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Snyder, R., Cardinal, M., Dauphinée, D. M., & Stavosky, J. W. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 85 · see citing works
EDMONDS, M. E., Bodansky, H. J., Boulton, A. J. M., Chadwick, P., Dang, C. N., D'Costa, R., Johnston, A., Kennon, B., Leese, G., Rajbhandari, S. M., et al. (2018) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/wrr.12630 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationLundquist, R., Holmstrøm, K., Clausen, C., Jørgensen, B., & Karlsmark, T. (2012) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2012.00870.x · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationJørgensen, B., Karlsmark, T., Vogensen, H., et al. (2011) · The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds · doi:10.1177/1534734611426755 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationUse of an autologous leucocyte and platelet-rich fibrin patch on hard-to-heal DFUs: a pilot study
Löndahl, M., Tarnow, L., Karlsmark, T., et al. (2015) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2015.24.4.172 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationMartínez‐Zapata, M. J., Orozco, L., Balius, R., et al. (2016) · PubMed · doi:10.2450/2015.0099-15 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Using image J to document healing in ulcers of the foot in diabetes
Jeffcoate, W. J., Musgrove, A., & Lincoln, N. B. (2017) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.12769 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationThe 2015 IWGDF guidance on the prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes
Bakker, K., Apelqvist, J., Lipsky, B. A., et al. (2015) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.12496 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The phagocytic fitness of leucopatches may impact the healing of chronic wounds
Thomsen, K., Trøstrup, H., Christophersen, L., Lundquist, R., Høiby, N., & Moser, C. E. (2016) · Clinical & Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1111/cei.12773 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Game, F. L., Jeffcoate, W. J., Tarnow, L., et al. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2216-9 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationPemberton, V., Turner, V., & VanGilder, C. A. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Armstrong, D. G., Tan, T.-W., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.10578 · Cited by 1,658 · see citing works
Chen, P., Vilorio, N. C., Dhatariya, K., Jeffcoate, W., Lobmann, R., McIntosh, C., Piaggesi, A., Steinberg, J., Vas, P., Viswanathan, V., et al. (2024) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3644 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Extracellular matrix-inspired biomaterials for wound healing
Hosty, L., Heatherington, T., Quondamatteo, F., & Browne, S. (2024) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-024-09750-9 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
- Authors
- Game, F., Jeffcoate, W., Tarnow, L., Jacobsen, J. L., Whitham, D. J., Harrison, E. F., Ellender, S. J., Fitzsimmons, D., Löndahl, M., Dhatariya, K., Chant, H., Spyer, G., Donohoe, M., Uchegbu, E., Whitelaw, D., Nayar, R., Rossing, P., Gottlieb, H., Michelsen, M., Nielsen, A. M., Houlind, K., Sørensen, J., Henneberg, E., Jørgensen, B., Narayanan, K., Kong, M.-F., Tarik, A., Gandhi, R., Hariman, C., Oguntolu, V., Rayman, G., Siddique, H., D'Costa, R., Maguire, D., Aung, T., Holmer, H., Catrina, S.-B., Ogunko, A., Rajbhandari, S., & Russell, D.
- Affiliations
- Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- Nordsjællands Hospital (DK)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Swansea University (GB)
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Game, Frances
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 870-878
- ISSN
- 2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2892143706
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
- Keywords
- diabetic foot ulcer, chronic wounds, platelets, fibrin, wound healing, type 2 diabetes, wound dressings, re-epithelialization
- MeSH terms
- Blood Platelets, Denmark, Female, Fibrin, United Kingdom, Humans, Leukocytes, Male, Middle Aged, Sweden, Wound Healing, Drug Delivery Systems, Treatment Outcome, Diabetic Foot, Transdermal Patch, Re-Epithelialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review