Cited by 46Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Indatuximab ravtansine plus dexamethasone with lenalidomide or pomalidomide in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, phase 1/2a study

Kelly, Kevin R, Ailawadhi, Sikander, Siegel, David S, Heffner, Leonard T, Somlo, George, Jagannath, Sundar, Zimmerman, Todd M, Munshi, Nikhil C +13 more·2021·The Lancet Haematology

Abstract

Background Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062) is an antibody-drug conjugate that binds to CD138 and synergistically enhances the antitumor activity of lenalidomide in preclinical models of multiple myeloma. This phase 1/2a study was done to determine the safety, activity, and pharmacokinetics of indatuximab ravtansine in combination with immunomodulatory drugs in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods This open-label, phase 1/2a study took place at nine hospital sites in the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, and ECOG performance status or Zubrod score of 2 or below. Patients who received indatuximab ravtansine with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide) had failure of at least one previous therapy. Patients treated with indatuximab ravtansine with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide) had failure of at least two previous therapies (including lenalidomide and bortezomib) and had progressive disease on or within 60 days of completion of their last treatment. In phase 1, patients received indatuximab ravtansine intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle in escalating dose levels of 80 mg/m 2, 100 mg/m 2, and 120 mg/m 2, with lenalidomide (25 mg; days 1 to 21 every 28 days orally) and dexamethasone (20-40 mg; days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days). In phase 2, the recommended phase 2 dose of indatuximab ravtansine was given to an expanded cohort of patients in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The protocol was amended to allow additional patients to be treated with indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide (4 mg; days 1 to 21 every 28 days orally) and dexamethasone, in a more heavily pretreated patient population than in the indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide group. The phase 1 primary endpoint was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum tolerated dose (recommended phase 2 dose) of indatuximab ravtansine, and the phase 2 primary endpoint was to describe the objective response rate (ORR; partial response or better) and clinical benefit response (ORR plus minor response). All patients were analysed for safety and all patients with post-treatment response assessments were analysed for activity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01638936, and is complete. Findings 64 (86%) of 74 screened patients were enrolled between July 3, 2012, and June 30, 2015. 47 (73%) patients received indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide (median follow-up 24·2 months [IQR 19·9-45·4]) and 17 (27%) received indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide (24·1 months [17·7-36·7]). The maximum tolerated dose of indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide was 100 mg/m 2, and defined as the recommended phase 2 dose for indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide. An objective response for indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide was observed in 33 (71·7%) of 46 patients and in 12 (70·6%) of 17 patients in the indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide group. The clinical benefit response for indatuximab ravtansine plus lenalidomide was 85% (39 of 46 patients) and for indatuximab ravtansine plus pomalidomide it was 88% (15 of 17 patients). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia (14 [22%] of 64 patients), anaemia (10 [16%]), and thrombocytopenia (seven [11%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that led to discontinuation occurred in 35 (55%) of the 64 patients. Five (8%) patients with a TEAE had a fatal outcome; none was reported as related to indatuximab ravtansine. Interpretation Indatuximab ravtansine in combination with immunomodulatory drugs shows preliminary antitumor activity, is tolerated, and could be further evaluated in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Funding Biotest AG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2352-3026(21)00208-8

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a phase 1/2a trial, BT062 combined with lenalidomide or pomalidomide produced objective response rates of 71.7% and 70.6%, respectively, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients.

    “In a phase 1/2a clinical trial evaluating the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of BT062 in combination with immunomodulators in RRMM patients who had received at least two prior lines of therapy, promising results were observed. The combination of BT062 with lenalidomide or pomalidomide resulted in objective response rates of 71.7% (33 out of 46 patients) and 70.6% (12 out of 16 patients),”

    From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [196]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, K. R., Ailawadhi, S., Siegel, D. S., Heffner, L. T., Somlo, G., Jagannath, S., Zimmerman, T. M., Munshi, N. C., Madan, S., Chanan-Khan, A., Lonial, S., Chandwani, S., Minasyan, A., Ruehle, M., Barmaki-Rad, F., Abdolzade-Bavil, A., Rharbaoui, F., Herrmann-Keiner, E., Haeder, T., Wartenberg-Demand, A., & Anderson, K. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
  • Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Biotest (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Kevin R
Venue
The Lancet Haematology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
e794-e807
ISSN
2352-3026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199538346
Cited by
46
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Haematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Gilead Sciences
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA014089)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, dexamethasone, antibody-drug conjugates, syndecan-1, immunomodulators, combination therapy, pharmacokinetics, safety, dose escalation, progression-free survival, overall survival
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone, Female, Humans, Male, Maytansine, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Thalidomide, Immunoconjugates, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Maximum Tolerated Dose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review