Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies and clinical outcomes in a high-risk US population screened by mass spectrometry: a multicentre cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Background Prevalence estimates for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) are based on predominantly White study populations screened by serum protein electrophoresis supplemented with immunofixation electrophoresis. A prevalence of 3% is reported for MGUS in the general population of European ancestry aged 50 years or older. MGUS prevalence is two times higher in individuals of African descent or with a family history of conditions related to multiple myeloma. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical implications of monoclonal gammopathies in a high-risk US population screened by quantitative mass spectrometry. Methods We used quantitative matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and EXENT-iQ software to screen for and quantify monoclonal gammopathies in serum from 7622 individuals who consented to the PROMISE screening study between Feb 26, 2019, and Nov 4, 2021, and the Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB) between July 28, 2010, and July 1, 2021. M-protein concentrations at the monoclonal gammopathy of indeterminate potential (MGIP) level were confirmed by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry testing. 6305 (83%; 2211 from PROMISE, 4094 from MGBB) of 7622 participants in the cohorts were at high risk for developing a monoclonal gammopathy on the basis of Black race or a family history of haematological malignancies and fell within the eligible high-risk age range (30 years or older for PROMISE cohort and 18 years or older for MGBB cohort); those over 18 years were also eligible if they had two or more family members with a blood cancer (PROMISE cohort). Participants with a plasma cell malignancy diagnosed before screening were excluded. Longitudinal clinical data were available for MGBB participants with a median follow-up time from serum sample screening of 4·5 years (IQR 2·4-6·7). The PROMISE study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03689595. Findings The median age at time of screening was 56·0 years (IQR 46·8-64·1). 5013 (66%) of 7622 participants were female, 2570 (34%) male, and 39 (<1%) unknown. 2439 (32%) self-identified as Black, 4986 (65%) as White, 119 (2%) as other, and 78 (1%) unknown. Using serum protein electrophoresis with immunofixation electrophoresis, the MGUS prevalence was 6% (101 of 1714) in high-risk individuals aged 50 years or older. Using mass spectrometry, we observed a total prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies of 43% (1788 of 4207) in this group. We termed monoclonal gammopathies below the clinical immunofixation electrophoresis detection level (<0·2 g/L) MGIPs, to differentiate them from those with higher concentrations, termed mass-spectrometry MGUS, which had a 13% (592 of 4207) prevalence by mass spectrometry in high-risk individuals aged 50 years or older. MGIP was predominantly of immunoglobulin M isotype, and its prevalence increased with age (19% [488 of 2564] for individuals aged <50 years, 29% [1464 of 5058] for those aged ≥50 years, and 37% [347 of 946] for those aged ≥70 years). Mass-spectrometry MGUS prevalence increased with age (5% [127 of 2564] for individuals aged <50 years, 13% [678 of 5058] for those aged ≥50 years, and 18% [173 of 946] for those aged ≥70 years) and was higher in men (314 [12%] of 2570) compared with women (485 [10%] 5013; p=0·0002), whereas MGIP prevalence did not differ significantly by gender. In those aged 50 years or older, the prevalence of mass spectrometry was significantly higher in Black participants (224 [17%] of 1356) compared with the controls (p=0·0012) but not in those with family history (368 [13%] of 2851) compared with the controls (p=0·1008). Screen-detected monoclonal gammopathies correlated with increased all-cause mortality in MGBB participants (hazard ratio 1·55, 95% CI 1·16-2·08; p=0·0035). All monoclonal gammopathies were associated with an increased likelihood of comorbidities, including myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1·60, 95% CI 1·26-2·02; p=0·00016 for MGIP-high and 1·39, 1·07-1·80; p=0·015 for mass-spectrometry MGUS). Interpretation We detected a high prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies, including age-associated MGIP, and made more precise estimates of mass-spectrometry MGUS compared with conventional gel-based methods. The use of mass spectrometry also highlighted the potential hidden clinical significance of MGIP. Our study suggests the association of monoclonal gammopathies with a variety of clinical phenotypes and decreased overall survival. Funding Stand Up To Cancer Dream Team, the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, and National Institutes of Health.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mass spectrometry studies show that the percentage of MGUS/SMM is higher than previously reported.
“The use of mass spectrometry has allowed independent groups to show that the percentage of MGUS/SMM is higher than previously reported.14,36”
From Evolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective (2026) · cites this paper as [36]
The Results (page not provided) report MGUS prevalence of 11% by mass spectrometry versus 5% by conventional testing in the same screened participants. The Discussion also notes that prior mass-spectrometry studies detected higher rates. Our copy does not establish a higher prevalence of SMM, and this study’s comparison concerns a high-risk cohort rather than the general population. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes
Jaiswal, S., Fontanillas, P., Flannick, J., Manning, A., Grauman, P. V., Mar, B. G., Lindsley, R. C., Mermel, C. H., Burtt, N., Chavez, A., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1408617 · Cited by 4,841 · see citing works
Self-citationPrevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
Kyle, R. A., Therneau, T. M., Rajkumar, S. V., Larson, D. R., Plevak, M. F., Offord, J. R., Dispenzieri, A., Katzmann, J. A., & Melton, L. J. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa054494 · Cited by 1,423 · see citing works
Leukemia-associated somatic mutations drive distinct patterns of age-related clonal hemopoiesis
McKerrell, T., Park, N., Moreno, T., Grove, C. S., Ponstingl, H., Stephens, J., Crawley, C., Craig, J., Scott, M. A., Hodkinson, C., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.005 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Schinasi, L. H., Brown, E. E., Camp, N. J., Wang, S. S., Hofmann, J. N., Chiu, B. C., Miligi, L., Beane Freeman, L. E., de Sanjose, S., Bernstein, L., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.14199 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- [1]Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009; 113(22): 5412– 5417. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241 19179464 PMC2689042 · DOI · Paper page
- [2]Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(8): 564– 569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa01133202 11856795 · DOI · Paper page
- [4]Hallen J Frequency of “abnormal” serum globulins (M-components) in the aged. Acta Med Scand. 1963; 173: 737– 744. 13952159
- [5]Axelsson U, Bachmann R, Hällén J. Frequency of pathological proteins (M-components) om 6,995 sera from an adult population. Acta Med Scand. 1966; 179(2): 235– 247. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1966.tb05453.x 4160039 · DOI
- [6]Landgren O, Gridley G, Turesson I, Risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and subsequent multiple myeloma among African American and white veterans in the United States. Blood. 2006; 107(3): 904– 906. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3449 16210333 PMC1895893 · DOI
- [7]Landgren O, Rajkumar SV, Pfeiffer RM, Obesity is associated with an increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among black and white women. Blood. 2010; 116(7): 1056– 1059. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-262394 20421448 PMC2938127 · DOI
- [8]Landgren O, Katzmann JA, Hsing AW, Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among men in Ghana. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007; 82(12): 1468– 1473. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)61089-6 18053453 · DOI
- [9]Landgren O, Graubard BI, Kumar S, Prevalence of myeloma precursor state monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in 12372 individuals 10–49 years old: a population-based study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Blood Cancer J. 2017; 7(10): e618. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.97 29053158 PMC5678222 · DOI
- [10]Landgren O, Kristinsson SY, Goldin LR, Risk of plasma cell and lymphoproliferative disorders among 14621 first-degree relatives of 4458 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in Sweden. Blood. 2009; 114(4): 791– 795. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-191676 19182202 PMC2716021 · DOI
- [11]Vachon CM, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy in first-degree relatives of patients with multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2009; 114(4): 785– 790. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-192575 19179466 PMC2716020 · DOI
- [13]Lynch HT, Ferrara K, Barlogie B, Familial Myeloma: Study of a Unique Family. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(2): 152– 157. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708704 18614782 PMC2775509 · DOI
- [14]Dispenzieri A, Katzmann JA, Kyle RA, Prevalence and risk of progression of light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2010; 375(9727): 1721– 1728. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60482-5 PMC2904571 20472173 · DOI
- [15]Murray D, Kumar SK, Kyle RA, Detection and prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a study utilizing mass spectrometry-based monoclonal immunoglobulin rapid accurate mass measurement. Blood Cancer J. 2019; 9(12): 102. doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0263-z 31836698 PMC6910906 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]Derman BA, Stefka AT, Jiang K, Measurable residual disease assessed by mass spectrometry in peripheral blood in multiple myeloma in a phase II trial of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone and autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood Cancer J. 2021; 11(2): 19. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00418-2 33563912 PMC7873068 · DOI
- [19]Yizhak K, Aguet F, Kim J, RNA sequence analysis reveals macroscopic somatic clonal expansion across normal tissues. Science. 2019; 364(6444): eaaw0726. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw0726 31171663 PMC7350423 · DOI · Paper page
- [20]Jaiswal S, Natarajan P, Silver AJ, Clonal Hematopoiesis and Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(2): 111– 121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701719 28636844 PMC6717509 · DOI · Paper page
- [21]Murray DL, Seningen JL, Dispenzieri A, Laboratory Persistence and Clinical Progression of Small Monoclonal Abnormalities. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012; 138(4): 609– 613. doi: 10.1309/AJCPT6OWWMHITA1Y 23010717 PMC3904358 · DOI
- [22]Widmer CC, Balabanov S, Schanz U, Theocharides APA. Transient paraproteinemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an underexplored phenomenon associated with graft versus host disease. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(63): 106333– 106341. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22462 29290952 PMC5739737 · DOI
- [23]Conant JL, Rabinowitz I, Zhang QY. Transient monoclonal gammopathy induced by Candida fungemia. Hum Pathol. 2018; 75: 154– 158. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.11.012 29180248 · DOI
- [24]Vodopick H, Chaskes SJ, Solomon A, Stewart JA. Transient monoclonal gammopathy associated with cytomegalovirus infection. Blood. 1974; 44(2): 189– 195. 4369394
- [25]Gagnon MF, Cardinal H, Emond JP, Latour M, Lemieux B. The Evolution of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplant Direct. 2019; 5(10): e489. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000937 31723584 PMC6791600 · DOI
- [26]Stoimenis D, Spyridonidou C, Papaioannou N. Transient Monoclonal Gammopathy Induced by Disseminated Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Case Rep Med. 2012; 2012: 607104. doi: 10.1155/2012/607104 23304158 PMC3523343 · DOI
- [27]Weiss BM, Minter A, Abadie J, Patterns of monoclonal immunoglobulins and serum free light chains are significantly different in black compared to white monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) patients. Am J Hematol. 2011; 86(6): 475– 478. doi: 10.1002/ajh.22025 21544856 · DOI
- [28]Lakshman A, Rajkumar SV, Buadi FK, Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma incorporating revised IMWG diagnostic criteria. Blood Cancer J. 2018; 8(6): 59. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0077-4 29895887 PMC5997745 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dutta, A. K., Alberge, J.-B., Lightbody, E. D., Boehner, C. J., Dunford, A., Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, R., Mouhieddine, T. H., Cowan, A. N., Su, N. K., Horowitz, E. M., et al. (2023) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-0482 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationNadeem, O., Aranha, M. P., Redd, R., Timonian, M., Magidson, S., Lightbody, E. D., Alberge, J.-B., Bertamini, L., Dutta, A. K., El-Khoury, H., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55308-5 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective
Maura, F., Samur, M., & Munshi, N. (2026) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2024026313 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- El-Khoury, H., Lee, D. J., Alberge, J.-B., Redd, R., Cea-Curry, C. J., Perry, J., Barr, H., Murphy, C., Sakrikar, D., Barnidge, D., Bustoros, M., Leblebjian, H., Cowan, A., Davis, M. I., Amstutz, J., Boehner, C. J., Lightbody, E. D., Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, R., Perkins, M. C., Harding, S., Mo, C. C., Kapoor, P., Mikhael, J., Borrello, I. M., Fonseca, R., Weiss, S. T., Karlson, E., Trippa, L., Rebbeck, T. R., Getz, G., Marinac, C. R., & Ghobrial, I. M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ghobrial, Irene M
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Haematology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e340-e349
- ISSN
- 2352-3026 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9067621
- OpenAlex
- W4221052820
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 12.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 177 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- The Lancet Haematology (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA133799, R01CA205954, K22CA251648, R35CA263817)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R25AI147393)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
- Keywords
- monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, M protein, prevalence, vulnerable populations, Black race, multiple myeloma, plasma cell malignancy, clinical outcomes, disease progression, promise
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance, Multiple Myeloma, Paraproteinemias, Mass Spectrometry, Cohort Studies, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review