Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts among adolescents in 59 low-income and middle-income countries: a population-based study

Open access
Uddin, Riaz, Burton, Nicola W, Maple, Myfanwy, Khan, Shanchita R, Khan, Asaduzzaman·2019·The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND Suicide is a major global health challenge and a leading cause of death among adolescents, but research related to suicide has concentrated on high-income countries. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts in adolescents from 59 low-income and middle-income countries. METHODS In this population-based study, we used data from the Global School-based Student Health Survey of schoolchildren aged 13-17 years between 2003 and 2015, in 59 low-income and middle-income countries across six WHO regions. Using a meta-analysis with random effects, we computed the sex-based and age-based estimates of regional and overall prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicide planning, and suicide attempts. FINDINGS Our sample consisted of 229 129 adolescents (mean age 14·6 [SD 1·18] years; 111 082 [48%] boys and 118 047 [52%] girls). The overall prevalence of suicidal ideation was 16·9% (95% CI 15·0-18·8), suicide planning was 17·0% (14·8-19·2), and suicide attempts was 17·0% (14·7-19·3) in the 12 months preceding survey completion. The African region had the highest prevalence of suicidal ideation (20·4%, 17·3-23·6) and suicide planning (23·7%, 19·1-28·3), and the western Pacific region had the highest prevalence of suicide attempts (20·5%, 14·3-26·7). Southeast Asia had the lowest prevalence of ideation (8·0%, 4·5-11·5), planning (9·9%, 5·0-14·8), and attempts (9·2%, 5·1-13·3). Girls had higher prevalence than boys for suicidal ideation (18·5%, 16·4-20·6 vs 15·1%, 13·4-16·7), suicide planning (18·2%, 15·8-20·6 vs 15·6%, 13·7-17·6), and suicide attempts (17·4%, 15·0-19·8 vs 16·3%, 14·0-18·6). Adolescents aged 15-17 years had higher prevalence than those aged 13-14 years of suicidal ideation (17·8%, 15·8-19·8 vs 15·9%, 14·1-17·6), suicide planning (17·8%, 15·7-20·0 vs 16·3%, 14·7-17·9), and suicide attempts (17·6%, 15·2-20·0 vs 16·2%, 13·8-18·5). INTERPRETATION Suicidal thoughts and behaviours are prevalent among adolescents in low-income and middle-income countries, particularly in the African and the western Pacific regions, and particularly among girls and adolescents aged 15-17 years. Targeted suicide prevention initiatives are needed and should take into account the diverse range of cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds of the countries. FUNDING None.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30403-6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Uddin, R., Burton, N. W., Maple, M., Khan, S. R., & Khan, A.
Venue
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
223-233
ISSN
2352-4642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921645654
Cited by
303
References
4
FWCI
32.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.