The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nivolumab alone or in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 1 study
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab, as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, in Japanese patients with biliary tract cancer. METHODS This multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial was done at four cancer centres in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20-79 years, had biliary tract adenocarcinoma (intrahepatic bile duct cancer, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, adequate hepatic, renal, and haematological function, and tumour tissue samples for PD-L1 expression analysis. Patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer that was refractory or intolerant to gemcitabine-based treatment regimens received nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg every 2 weeks [monotherapy cohort]). Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer received nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) chemotherapy (combined therapy cohort). The primary objective was to assess tolerability and safety. The primary objective was assessed in the safety population of all patients who had received at least one dose of nivolumab. This study is registered with www.clinicaltrials.jp, number JapicCTI-153098, and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS 30 patients were enrolled into each cohort between Jan 13, 2016, and April 19, 2017. Data cutoff was Aug 31, 2017. In the monotherapy cohort, the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were decreased appetite (five [17%]), malaise (four [13%]), and pruritus (four [13%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported by three (10%) patients (rash, maculopapular rash, and amylase increase) and treatment-related serious adverse events were reported by one (3%) patient (pleurisy). In the combined therapy cohort, the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were neutrophil count decrease (any grade 25 [83%]; grade 3-4 in 23 [77%] patients) and platelet count decrease (any grade 25 [83%] of 30; grade 3-4 in 15 [50%] patients). Six (20%) patients reported 11 treatment-related serious adverse events (platelet count decrease [three patients], febrile neutropenia [two patients], neutrophil count decrease, anaemia, anaphylactic reaction, decreased appetite, pyrexia, and myocarditis [one patient each]). In the monotherapy cohort, median overall survival was 5·2 months (90% CI 4·5-8·7), median progression-free survival was 1·4 months (90% CI 1·4-1·4), and one of 30 patients had an objective response. In the combined therapy cohort, median overall survival was 15·4 months (90% CI 11·8-not estimable), median progression-free survival was 4·2 months (90% CI 2·8-5·6), and 11 of 30 patients had an objective response. INTERPRETATION Nivolumab had a manageable safety profile and signs of clinical activity in patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer. This initial assessment of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer provides supportive evidence for future larger randomised studies of nivolumab in this difficult to treat cancer. FUNDING Ono Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Bristol-Myers Squibb Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti–PD-1 antibody in cancer
Topalian, S. L., Hodi, F. S., Brahmer, J. R., Gettinger, S. N., Smith, D. C., McDermott, D. F., Powderly, J. D., Carvajal, R. D., Sosman, J. A., Atkins, M. B., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1200690 · Cited by 12,628
Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer
Borghaei, H., Paz-Ares, L., Horn, L., Spigel, D. R., Steins, M., Ready, N. E., Chow, L. Q., Vokes, E. E., Felip, E., Holgado, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1507643 · Cited by 9,335
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Brahmer, J., Reckamp, K. L., Baas, P., Crinò, L., Eberhardt, W. E. E., Poddubskaya, E., Antonia, S., Pluzanski, A., Vokes, E. E., Holgado, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504627 · Cited by 8,447
Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Motzer, R. J., Escudier, B., McDermott, D. F., George, S., Hammers, H. J., Srinivas, S., Tykodi, S. S., Sosman, J. A., Procopio, G., Plimack, E. R., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1510665 · Cited by 5,807
Cisplatin plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine for Biliary Tract Cancer
Valle, J., Wasan, H., Palmer, D. H., Cunningham, D., Anthoney, A., Maraveyas, A., Madhusudan, S., Iveson, T., Hughes, S., Pereira, S. P., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0908721 · Cited by 4,406
Alsaab, H. O., Sau, S., Alzhrani, R., Tatiparti, K., Bhise, K., Kashaw, S. K., & Iyer, A. K. (2017) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00561 · Cited by 1,707
Okusaka, T., Nakachi, K., Fukutomi, A., Mizuno, N., Ohkawa, S., Funakoshi, A., Nagino, M., Kondo, S., Nagaoka, S., Funai, J., et al. (2010) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605779 · Cited by 744
Self-citationBiliary cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Valle, J. W., Borbath, I., Khan, S. A., Huguet, F., Gruenberger, T., & Arnold, D. (2016) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw324 · Cited by 675
Second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancer: a systematic review
Lamarca, A., Hubner, R. A., David Ryder, W., & Valle, J. W. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu162 · Cited by 339
The evolving role of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: A review
Gelsomino, F., Barbolini, M., Spallanzani, A., Pugliese, G., & Cascinu, S. (2016) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.10.005 · Cited by 313
Cited by
Valle, J. W., Kelley, R. K., Nervi, B., Oh, D.-Y., & Zhu, A. X. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00153-7 · Cited by 1,043
Subbiah, V., Lassen, U., Élez, E., Italiano, A., Curigliano, G., Javle, M., de Braud, F., Prager, G. W., Greil, R., Stein, A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30321-1 · Cited by 533
Piha‐Paul, S. A., Oh, D., Ueno, M., Malka, D., Chung, H. C., Nagrial, A., Kelley, R. K., Ros, W., Italiano, A., Nakagawa, K., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.33013 · Cited by 486
Self-citationSystemic therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Kelley, R. K., Bridgewater, J., Gores, G. J., & Zhu, A. X. (2020) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.009 · Cited by 412
Roa, J. C., García, P., Kapoor, V. K., Maithel, S. K., Javle, M., & Koshiol, J. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00398-y · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Ueno, M., Ikeda, M., Morizane, C., Kobayashi, S., Ohno, I., Kondo, S., Okano, N., Kimura, K., Asada, S., Namba, Y., Okusaka, T., & Furuse, J.
- Venue
- The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 611-621
- ISSN
- 2468-1156 (ISSN-L)
- 2468-1253
- OpenAlex
- W2946053006
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 38.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nivolumab alone or in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 1 study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30086-x
- The paper
- Ueno, M., Ikeda, M., Morizane, C., Kobayashi, S., Ohno, I., Kondo, S., Okano, N., Kimura, K., Asada, S., Namba, Y., Okusaka, T., & Furuse, J. (2019). Nivolumab alone or in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer: a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 1 study. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30086-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.