CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 424Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPelvic floor disorders treatmentsIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global prevalence of functional constipation according to the Rome criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Barberio, Brigida, Judge, Ciaran, Savarino, Edoardo V, Ford, Alexander C·2021·The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
DOI 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00111-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background Functional constipation is a common functional bowel disorder in the community, which has a varying prevalence across cross-sectional surveys. We did a contemporaneous systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using comparable methodology and all iterations of the Rome criteria to estimate the global prevalence of functional constipation.Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Embase Classic from Jan 1, 1990, to Dec 31, 2020, to identify population-based cross-sectional studies comprising at least 50 participants that reported the prevalence of functional constipation in adults (age 18 years and older) according to Rome I, II, III, or IV criteria. We excluded studies that reported the prevalence of functional constipation in convenience samples. We extracted prevalence estimates of functional constipation from eligible studies, according to the study criteria used to define it. For each study, we extracted data for country; method of data collection; criteria used to define functional constipation; whether the study used the Rome I, II, III, or IV diagnostic questionnaires or approximated these definitions of the condition using another questionnaire; the total number of participants providing complete data; age; the number of participants with the condition; the number of male and female participants; and the number of male and female participants with the condition. We calculated pooled prevalence, odds ratios (OR), and 95% CIs.Findings Of 8174 citations evaluated, 45 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, representing 80 separate populations and comprising 275 260 participants. The pooled prevalence of functional constipation was 15·3% (95% CI 8·1-24·4, I 2=99·4%) in studies using the Rome I criteria, 11·2% (7·9-14·9; I 2=99·6%) in studies that used Rome II criteria, 10·4% (6·5-14·9; I 2=99·8%) in those that used Rome III criteria, and 10·1% (8·7-11·6; I 2=98·2%) when Rome IV criteria were used. Prevalence of functional constipation was higher in women, irrespective of the Rome criteria used (OR 2·40 [95% CI 2·02-2·86] for Rome I, 1·94 [1·46-2·57] for Rome II, and 2·32 [1·85-2·92] for Rome III; no studies using Rome IV criteria reported prevalence by sex). There was significant heterogeneity between studies in all of our analyses, which persisted even when the same criteria were applied and similar methodologies used.Interpretation Even when uniform symptom-based criteria are used to define the presence of functional constipation, prevalence varies between countries. Thus, environmental, cultural, ethnic, dietary, or genetic factors can influence reporting of symptoms. Future studies should aim to elucidate reasons for this geographical variability.Funding None.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00111-4

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Drossman, 1990, Identification of sub-groups of functional gastrointestinal disorders, Gastroenterol Intl, 3, 159
  2. Hoch, 2011, Symptom frequency, health care seeking behavior, and satisfaction with therapy among chronic constipation (CC) patients with both constipation and abdominal symptoms: results of a population-based survey, Neurogastroenterol Motil, 23, 29
  3. Leelakusolvong, 2012, Prevalence of lower functional gastrointestinal disorders and the associated factors among Thai healthy subjects, J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 27, 149
  4. Pengiran Musa, 2012, Survey of bowel habits and its relation to physical activity and fiber intake in brunei darussalam, J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 27, 142

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 424

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Barberio, B., Judge, C., Savarino, E. V., & Ford, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • St. James's Hospital (IE)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Ford, Alexander C
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
638-648
ISSN
  • 2468-1156 (ISSN-L)
  • 2468-1253
DOI
10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00111-4
OpenAlex
W3166463621
Cited by
422
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 5
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
Keywords
functional constipation, Rome criteria, prevalence, functional bowel disorders, Rome IV criteria, sex differences, regional variation, symptom-based diagnosis, adults
MeSH terms
Constipation, Defecation, Humans, Global Health, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review