Cited by 617Gastrointestinal motility and disordersPelvic floor disorders treatmentsCongenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies

Chronic constipation: a survey of the patient perspective

Open access
JOHANSON, J. F., KRALSTEIN, J.·2007·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background Constipation is a common, often chronic, gastrointestinal motility disorder characterized by such symptoms as straining, hard stool, and infrequent defecation. Published literature is limited regarding symptom prevalence, healthcare‐seeking behaviour, and patient satisfaction with traditional therapies for chronic constipation. Aim To assess the prevalence of chronic constipation among a random sample of Americans, to identify the frequency, severity and bothersomeness of their symptoms, and to assess satisfaction levels with traditional treatments. Methods All members (N = 37 004) of the Knowledge Networks Panel, representative of the US population, participated in a web‐based survey. Eligibility was established using a six‐question screener. Results Of the 24 090 panellists consenting to participate, 557 met eligibility requirements and took the 45‐question survey. The most prevalent symptom was straining (79%). Hard stool and straining were the top two severe symptoms, and bloating, straining and hard stool were the top three bothersome symptoms. Symptoms affected quality of life of more than half (52%) the respondents. Among those who worked or went to school, 12% experienced reduced productivity and a mean of 2.4 days of absence in the month before the survey. Most respondents had used (96%) or were using (72%) constipation relief therapy; however, nearly half (47%) were not completely satisfied, mainly because of efficacy (82%) and safety (16%) concerns. Conclusions Chronic constipation is common. Individual symptoms are often severe and bothersome, and many patients are dissatisfied with traditional treatment options, primarily because of lack of efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03238.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More than half of patients with chronic constipation are not satisfied with their current treatment.

    “However, more than half are not satisfied with their current treatment [6, 7]”

    From British Dietetic Association Guidelines for the Dietary Management of Chronic Constipation in Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Treatment satisfaction section reports that 47% of respondents were not completely satisfied with their current constipation treatment—less than half, not more than half. The abstract repeats the 47% figure. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nearly all patients try lifestyle management options for symptom relief, including dietary modifications that primarily focus on increasing dietary fibre intake.

    “Nearly all patients try lifestyle management options for symptom relief, including dietary modifications that primarily focus on increasing dietary fibre intake [6, 7].”

    From British Dietetic Association Guidelines for the Dietary Management of Chronic Constipation in Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction identifies increased dietary fibre as a lifestyle approach, and ‘Treatments to reduce constipation symptoms’ reports that 96% of respondents had tried some treatment. But the 96% includes over-the-counter and prescription products; the paper does not say nearly all patients tried lifestyle management or that dietary changes primarily focused on increasing fibre. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This lack of comprehensive guidelines interferes with the advice given by healthcare professionals, ultimately negatively impacting patients' symptom management and overall satisfaction.

    “This interferes with the advice given by healthcare professionals, ultimately negatively impacting patients' symptom management and overall satisfaction [6, 7].”

    From British Dietetic Association Guidelines for the Dietary Management of Chronic Constipation in Adults (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Treatment satisfaction section (page unavailable) reports that 47% of respondents were not completely satisfied with treatment, chiefly because it was ineffective. The paper does not link a lack of comprehensive guidelines to healthcare professionals’ advice or show that such advice caused poorer symptom management or satisfaction. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bowel movements alone are not a reliable indicator for constipation severity.

    “Bowel movements alone are not a reliable indicator for constipation severity, as they might be the successive outcome from laxatives without describing the sensation during defecation or the repeated passage of hard stools and straining.1,3”
  • More than half of patients with chronic constipation are not satisfied with their current treatment.

    “However, more than half are not satisfied with their current treatment [ 6 , 7 ], highlighting an urgent need to improve management strategies for chronic constipation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lembo A, Camilleri M. Chronic constipa- tion. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1360-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JOHANSON, J. F., & KRALSTEIN, J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago, Rockford campus (US)
Corresponding author
JOHANSON, J. F.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-08
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
599-608
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W1921373566
Cited by
617
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 24
FWCI
15.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
Keywords
chronic constipation, prevalence, symptom severity, straining, hard stools, bloating, quality of life, labor productivity, health-seeking behavior, treatment satisfaction, gastrointestinal motility disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Constipation, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review