Cited by 151Employment and Welfare StudiesSocial Policy and Reform StudiesFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Effects on mental health of a UK welfare reform, Universal Credit: a longitudinal controlled study

Open access
Wickham, Sophie, Bentley, Lee, Rose, Tanith, Whitehead, Margaret, Taylor-Robinson, David, Barr, Ben·2020·The Lancet Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Universal Credit, a welfare benefit reform in the UK, began to replace six existing benefit schemes in April, 2013, starting with the income-based Job Seekers Allowance. We aimed to determine the effects on mental health of the introduction of Universal Credit. METHODS: In this longitudinal controlled study, we linked 197 111 observations from 52 187 individuals of working age (16-64 years) in England, Wales, and Scotland who participated in the Understanding Society UK Longitudinal Household Panel Study between 2009 and 2018 with administrative data on the month when Universal Credit was introduced into the area in which each respondent lived. We included participants who had data on employment status, local authority area of residence, psychological distress, and confounding variables. We excluded individuals from Northern Ireland and people out of work with a disability. We used difference-in-differences analysis of this nationally representative, longitudinal, household survey and separated respondents into two groups: unemployed people who were eligible for Universal Credit (intervention group) and people who were not unemployed and therefore would not have generally been eligible for Universal Credit (comparison group). Using the phased roll-out of Universal Credit, we compared the change in psychological distress (self-reported via General Health Questionnaire-12) between the intervention group and the comparison group over time as the reform was introduced in the area in which each respondent lived. We defined clinically significant psychological distress as a score of greater than 3 on the General Health Questionnaire-12. We tested whether there were differential effects across subgroups (age, sex, and education). FINDINGS: The prevalence of psychological distress increased in the intervention group by 6·57 percentage points (95% CI 1·69-11·42) after the introduction of Universal Credit relative to the comparison group, after accounting for potential confounders. We estimate that between April 29, 2013, and Dec 31, 2018, an additional 63 674 (95% CI 10 042-117 307) unemployed people will have experienced levels of psychological distress that are clinically significant due to the introduction of Universal Credit; 21 760 of these individuals might reach the diagnostic threshold for depression. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that the introduction of Universal Credit led to an increase in psychological distress, a measure of mental health difficulties, among those affected by the policy. Future changes to government welfare systems should be evaluated not only on a fiscal basis but on their potential to affect health and wellbeing. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, UK National Institute for Health Research, and Medical Research Council.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30026-8

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 'proportional' policy means that trustees receiving less will have reduced capacity to reciprocate, further diminishing their subsequent allocation - and thus locking them into a cycle of ever-diminishing resources.

    “However, this “proportional” policy means that trustees receiving less will have reduced capacity to reciprocate, further diminishing their subsequent allocation – and thus locking them into a cycle of ever-diminishing resources.”
  • Cutting unemployment benefits may itself create circumstances unfavourable to reemployment, such as long-term ill-health, leading to workers being permanently excluded from the labour market.

    “For example, cutting unemployment benefits may itself create circumstances unfavourable to reemployment30, such as long-term ill-health31, leading to workers being permanently excluded from the labour market.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]University of Essex Institute for Social and Economic Research 2018. Understanding Society: Waves 1-8, 2009-2017 and Harmonised BHPS: Waves 1–18, 1991–2009, 11th edn. UK Data Service. SN: 6614 10.5255/UKDA-SN-6614-13 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wickham, S., Bentley, L., Rose, T., Whitehead, M., Taylor-Robinson, D., & Barr, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Wickham, Sophie
Venue
The Lancet Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
e157-e164
ISSN
2468-2667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007476043
Cited by
151
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20
FWCI
24.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (200335/Z/15/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P008577/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
Universal Credit, welfare reform, psychological distress, mental health, unemployment, welfare benefits, policy impact, depression, working-age adults, GHQ-12, policy evaluation
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, Adolescent, Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Social Welfare, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review