Cited by 73Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaElder Abuse and Neglect

Interventions that prevent or respond to intimate partner violence against women and violence against children: a systematic review

Open access
Bacchus, Loraine J, Colombini, Manuela, Pearson, Isabelle, Gevers, Anik, Stöckl, Heidi, Guedes, Alessandra C·2024·The Lancet Public Health

Abstract

Efforts to prevent or respond to intimate partner violence (IPV) and violence against children (VAC) are still disparate worldwide, despite increasing evidence of intersections across these forms of violence. We conducted a systematic review to explore interventions that prevent or respond to IPV and VAC by parents or caregivers, aiming to identify common intervention components and mechanisms that lead to a reduction in IPV and VAC. 30 unique interventions from 16 countries were identified, with 20 targeting both IPV and VAC. Key mechanisms for reducing IPV and VAC in primary prevention interventions included improved communication, conflict resolution, reflection on harmful gender norms, and awareness of the adverse consequences of IPV and VAC on children. Therapeutic programmes for women and children who were exposed to IPV facilitated engagement with IPV-related trauma, increased awareness of the effects of IPV, and promoted avoidance of unhealthy relationships. Evidence gaps in low-income and middle-income countries involved adolescent interventions, post-abuse interventions for women and children, and interventions addressing both prevention and response to IPV and VAC. Our findings strengthen evidence in support of efforts to address IPV and VAC through coordinated prevention and response programmes. However, response interventions for both IPV and VAC are rare and predominantly implemented in high-income countries. Although therapeutic programmes for parents, caregivers, and children in high-income countries are promising, their feasibility in low-income and middle-income countries remains uncertain. Despite this uncertainty, there is potential to improve the use of health services to address IPV and VAC together.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00048-3

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providing psychoeducation and skills training with the parents of the exposed child or children has been shown to be effective for the abovementioned outcomes.

    “This approach may include providing psychoeducation and skills training with the parents of the exposed child or children, which has been shown to be effective for the abovementioned outcomes (Bacchus et al., 2024).”

    From The Intergenerational Transmission of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Bacchus et al., 2024

    The Design section (page unavailable) reports that parenting programmes taught communication and non-violent discipline skills and reduced violence, while interventions for women experiencing IPV and their children reported improvements in child mental health. It does not establish that a combined psychoeducation-and-skills-training programme for parents of exposed children was effective for the unspecified ‘abovementioned outcomes’; the Outcomes section also describes evidence for response interventions as scarce. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. EPOC resources for review authors. 2021. https://epoc.cochrane.org/ resources/epoc-resources-review-authors (accessed Feb 8, 2024).
  2. Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. 2023. https://training. cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-08 (accessed Feb 8, 2024).
  3. Ryan R. Cochrane consumers and communication review group: data synthesis and analysis. 2013. https://cccrg.cochrane.org/sites/ cccrg.cochrane.org/files/uploads/Analysis.pdf (accessed Feb 8, 2024).
  4. Kelly-Hanku A, Mek A, Trumb RN. A qualitative endline study of an intervention to build peace and reduce gender based violence in southern Bougainville, Papua New Guinea. January, 2017. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/314051824_Planim_Save_ Kamap_Strong_A_qualitative_end_line_assessment_of_an_ intervention_to_build_peace_and_reduce_gender_based_violence_ in_Southern_Bougainville_Papua_New_Guinea (accessed Feb 8, 2024).
  5. Digolo L, Asghar K, Berry V, et al. Evidence review: parenting and caregiver support programmes to prevent and respond to violence in the home. 2019. https://prevention-collaborative.org/wp-content/ uploads/2019/11/Evidence-Review-Parenting-programmes- lowres-23112019.pdf (accessed Feb 8, 2024).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bacchus, L. J., Colombini, M., Pearson, I., Gevers, A., Stöckl, H., & Guedes, A. C.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (DE)
  • United Nations Children's Fund (US)
Corresponding author
Bacchus, Loraine J
Venue
The Lancet Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
e326-e338
ISSN
2468-2667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396535982
Cited by
72
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-08-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
NIHR
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
intimate partner violence, violence against children, violence prevention, violence response, primary prevention, conflict resolution, gender norms, trauma treatment, adolescent intervention, low- and middle-income countries, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review