Cited by 56Intimate Partner and Family ViolencePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Differential therapeutic outcomes of community-based group interventions for women and children exposed to intimate partner violence

Open access
McWhirter, Paula T.·2011·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

Two community-based group therapies, emotion focused versus goal oriented, are compared among women exposed to intimate partner violence (n = 46) and their children ( n = 48) aged between 6 and 12 years. A series of repeated measures analyses are employed to evaluate the effects of time from baseline to postintervention following random assignment. Main and treatment effects for women provide support for the relative effectiveness in increasing quality of social support in the emotion-focused intervention and in the reduction of both family conflict and alcohol use for the goal-oriented intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260510383026

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The three studies by Kelly et al., McWhirter et al., and Nicolaidis et al. reported significant reductions in severity of depression and PTSD, as well as an increase in social support and self-efficacy for the women involved.

    “These studies reported significant reductions in severity of mental health conditions like depression and PTSD, as well as an increase in social support and self-efficacy for the women who were involved in the study.”

    From A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions focused on improving social support and/ mental health outcomes of survivors (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

    The women’s-group results (Journal of Interpersonal Violence 26(12); page unavailable) report significant effects for depression and self-efficacy, with decreases in depression and increases in self-efficacy in both groups. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports improved social support, particularly in the emotion-focused group. The paper discusses PTSD but does not report a reduction in PTSD severity among participants, so that part of the claim is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nine of the reviewed studies (3 RCTs, 3 pre-post evaluations, 3 qualitative research) consisted of community-based interventions.

    “9 (3 RCTs, 3 pre-post evaluations, 3 qualitative research) of the studies we reviewed consisted of interventions described as being community-based [34–42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Battered women and their families (3rd ed., pp. 159-173). New York: Springer.
  2. McWhirter, P. T., Florenzano, R., & Soublette, M. P. (2002). El modelo transteorico y su aplicación al tratamiento de adolescents con problemas de abuso de drogas [The transtheoretical model applied to adolescent substance use intervention]. Adolescencia Latinoamericana: Revista Cientifico Cultural Multidisciplinaria Bilingüe, 3(2), 23-30.
  3. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: Nfer-Nelson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McWhirter, P. T.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
McWhirter, Paula T.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2010-10-01
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
2457-2482
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2096456268
Cited by
56
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
intimate partner violence, group therapy, emotion-focused therapy, goal-directed therapy, social support, family conflict, alcohol consumption, community-based intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Analysis of Variance, Child, Community Mental Health Services, Emotions, Family Therapy, Female, Gestalt Theory, Goals, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Parent-Child Relations, Self-Assessment, Social Support, Spouse Abuse, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Southwestern United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Battered Women, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review