The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
National responsibility for ecological breakdown: a fair-shares assessment of resource use, 1970–2017
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Human impacts on earth-system processes are overshooting several planetary boundaries, driving a crisis of ecological breakdown. This crisis is being caused in large part by global resource extraction, which has increased dramatically over the past half century. We propose a novel method for quantifying national responsibility for ecological breakdown by assessing nations' cumulative material use in excess of equitable and sustainable boundaries. METHODS: For this analysis, we derived national fair shares of a sustainable resource corridor. These fair shares were then subtracted from countries' actual resource use to determine the extent to which each country has overshot its fair share over the period 1970-2017. Through this approach, each country's share of responsibility for global excess resource use was calculated. FINDINGS: High-income nations are responsible for 74% of global excess material use, driven primarily by the USA (27%) and the EU-28 high-income countries (25%). China is responsible for 15% of global excess material use, and the rest of the Global South (ie, the low-income and middle-income countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia) is responsible for only 8%. Overshoot in higher-income nations is driven disproportionately by the use of abiotic materials, whereas in lower-income nations it is driven disproportionately by the use of biomass. INTERPRETATION: These results show that high-income nations are the primary drivers of global ecological breakdown and they need to urgently reduce their resource use to fair and sustainable levels. Achieving sufficient reductions will likely require high-income nations to adopt transformative post-growth and degrowth approaches. FUNDING: None.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The current eco-social crisis is driven by an unsustainable socioeconomic model based on continued economic growth that exceeds planetary limits.”
From Bridging Sectors and Disciplines to Gain a Critical Understanding of the Eco-Social Determinants of Health Inequities: The ESDHI-EU Conference (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527
Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03180-140232 · Cited by 7,187
Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene
Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810141115 · Cited by 3,139
Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964 · Cited by 2,007
Self-citationThe material footprint of nations
Wiedmann, T., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D. D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1220362110 · Cited by 1,731
A good life for all within planetary boundaries
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4 · Cited by 1,452
Self-citationBUILDING EORA: A GLOBAL MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT DATABASE AT HIGH COUNTRY AND SECTOR RESOLUTION
Manfred Lenzen, A., Moran, D. D., Kanemoto, K., & Geschke, A. (2013) · Economic Systems Research · doi:10.1080/09535314.2013.769938 · Cited by 1,410
Toward some operational principles of sustainable development
Daly, H. E. (1990) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/0921-8009(90)90010-r · Cited by 1,369
Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities
Persson, L., Carney Almroth, B. M., Collins, C. D., Cornell, S., de Wit, C. A., Diamond, M. L., Fantke, P., Hassellöv, M., MacLeod, M., Ryberg, M. W., et al. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158 · Cited by 1,347
Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century
Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K., Haberl, H., & Fischer‐Kowalski, M. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007 · Cited by 1,140
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vogel, J., & Hickel, J. (2023) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(23)00174-2 · Cited by 342
Self-citationPost-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries
Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00310-3 · Cited by 261
Self-citationEarth system justice needed to identify and live within Earth system boundaries
Gupta, J., Liverman, D. M., Prodani, K., Aldunce, P., Bai, X., Broadgate, W. J., Ciobanu, D., Gifford, L., Gordon, C., Hurlbert, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-023-01064-1 · Cited by 305
Gupta, J., Bai, X., Liverman, D. M., Rockström, J., Qin, D., Stewart-Koster, B., Rocha, J. C., Jacobson, L., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L. S., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00042-1 · Cited by 197
Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries
Tian, P., Zhong, H., Chen, X., Feng, K., Sun, L., Zhang, N., Shao, X., Liu, Y., & Hubacek, K. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08154-w · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., & Zoomkawala, H.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hickel, Jason
- Venue
- The Lancet Planetary Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e342-e349
- ISSN
- 2542-5196 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4223520720
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 19
- FWCI
- 41.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Planetary Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- national responsibility, ecological breakdown, fair share, resource utilization (natural resources), planetary boundaries, overshoot, material utilization, equitable resource distribution, high-income countries, Global South, biomass utilization, degrowth, post-growth, resource extraction
- MeSH terms
- Africa, Asia, China, Humans, Middle East, Caribbean Region, Ecosystem, Ecological Parameter Monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
