Cited by 118

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Food processing and cancer risk in Europe: results from the prospective EPIC cohort study

Kliemann, Nathalie, Rauber, Fernanda, Bertazzi Levy, Renata, Viallon, Vivian, Vamos, Eszter P, Cordova, Reynalda, Freisling, Heinz, Casagrande, Corinne, Nicolas, Genevieve, Aune, Dagfinn, Tsilidis, Konstantinos K, Heath, Alicia, Schulze, Matthias B, Jannasch, Franziska, Srour, Bernard, Kaaks, Rudolf, Rodriguez-Barranco, Miguel, Tagliabue, Giovanna, Agudo, Antonio, Panico, Salvatore, Ardanaz, Eva, Chirlaque, María-Dolores, Vineis, Paolo, Tumino, Rosario, Perez-Cornago, Aurora, Andersen, Julie Louise Munk, Tjønneland, Anne, Skeie, Guri, Weiderpass, Elisabete, Monteiro, Carlos Augusto, Gunter, Marc J, Millett, Christopher, Huybrechts, Inge·2023·The Lancet Planetary Health

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2542-5196(23)00021-9

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive associations between the UPF share and nutrient profiles related to chronic diseases were also found in cross-sectional analyses of large cohorts in Europe, the USA, and Brazil.

    “Positive associations between the UPF share and nutrient profiles related to chronic diseases were also found in cross-sectional analyses of large cohorts in Europe, [49][50][51][52] the USA, 53 and Brazil.54”
  • Misclassification of poorly detailed food items (eg, bread) does not appear to affect study conclusions.

    “Furthermore, misclassification of poorly detailed food items (eg, bread) does not appear to affect study conclusions.49”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Sung, 2021, Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J Clin, 71, 209
  2. Cediel, 2021, Ultra-processed foods drive to unhealthy diets: evidence from Chile, Public Health Nutr, 24, 1698, 10.1017/S1368980019004737 · DOI
  3. Louzada, 2018, The share of ultra-processed foods determines the overall nutritional quality of diets in Brazil, Public Health Nutr, 21, 94, 10.1017/S1368980017001434 · DOI
  4. Juul, 2018, Ultra-processed food consumption and excess weight among US adults, Br J Nutr, 120, 90, 10.1017/S0007114518001046 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rauber, 2021, Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of obesity: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank, Eur J Nutr, 60, 2169, 10.1007/s00394-020-02367-1 · DOI
  6. Mendonça, 2016, Ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of overweight and obesity: the University of Navarra Follow-Up (SUN) cohort study, Am J Clin Nutr, 104, 1433, 10.3945/ajcn.116.135004 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Canhada, 2020, Ultra-processed foods, incident overweight and obesity, and longitudinal changes in weight and waist circumference: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA–Brasil), Public Health Nutr, 23, 1076, 10.1017/S1368980019002854 · DOI
  8. Beslay, 2020, Ultra-processed food intake in association with BMI change and risk of overweight and obesity: a prospective analysis of the French NutriNet-Santé cohort, PLoS Med, 17, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003256 · DOI
  9. Pagliai, 2021, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Br J Nutr, 125, 308, 10.1017/S0007114520002688 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Pouzou, 2018, Probabilistic assessment of dietary exposure to heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from consumption of meats and breads in the United States, Food Chem Toxicol, 114, 361, 10.1016/j.fct.2018.02.004 · DOI
  11. Friedman, 2015, Acrylamide: inhibition of formation in processed food and mitigation of toxicity in cells, animals, and humans, Food Funct, 6, 1752, 10.1039/C5FO00320B · DOI
  12. Queiroz, 2018, Nutritional and environmental risk factors for breast cancer: a case-control study, Sci Med (Porto Alegre), 28
  13. Solans, 2021, Consumption of ultra-processed food and drinks and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the MCC-Spain study, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18, 10.3390/ijerph18105457 · DOI
  14. Romaguera, 2021, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and drinks and colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer, Clin Nutr, 40, 1537, 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.033 · DOI
  15. Trudeau, 2020, Extent of food processing and risk of prostate cancer: the PROtEuS study in Montreal, Canada, Nutrients, 12, 637, 10.3390/nu12030637 · DOI
  16. Lauby-Secretan, 2016, Body fatness and cancer—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group, N Engl J Med, 375, 794, 10.1056/NEJMsr1606602 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Spencer, 2002, Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants, Public Health Nutr, 5, 561, 10.1079/PHN2001322 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Skeie, 2015, Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study, Clin Epidemiol, 7, 313, 10.2147/CLEP.S83839 · DOI
  19. Huybrechts, 2022, Characterisation of the degree of food processing in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition: application of the Nova classification and validation using selected biomarkers of food processing, Front Nutr, 16
  20. Machado, 2019, Ultra-processed foods and recommended intake levels of nutrients linked to non-communicable diseases in Australia: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study, BMJ Open, 9, 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029544 · DOI
  21. Caldwell, 2012, DEHP: genotoxicity and potential carcinogenic mechanisms—a review, Mutat Res, 751, 82, 10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.03.001 · DOI
  22. Seachrist, 2016, A review of the carcinogenic potential of bisphenol A, Reprod Toxicol, 59, 167, 10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.09.006 · DOI
  23. Emfietzoglou, 2019, Could the endocrine disruptor bisphenol-A be implicated in the pathogenesis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer? Metabolic considerations and future directions, Metabolism, 91, 61, 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.007 · DOI
  24. Goldman, 2003, Food mutagens, J Nutr, 133, 965S, 10.1093/jn/133.3.965S · DOI
  25. Viennois, 2020, Dietary emulsifiers directly impact adherent-invasive E coli gene expression to drive chronic intestinal inflammation, Cell Rep, 33, 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108229 · DOI
  26. Soffritti, 2014, The carcinogenic effects of aspartame: the urgent need for regulatory re-evaluation, Am J Ind Med, 57, 383, 10.1002/ajim.22296 · DOI
  27. Vandevijvere, 2019, Global trends in ultraprocessed food and drink product sales and their association with adult body mass index trajectories, Obes Rev, 20, 10, 10.1111/obr.12860 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kliemann, N., Rauber, F., Bertazzi Levy, R., Viallon, V., Vamos, E. P., Cordova, R., Freisling, H., Casagrande, C., Nicolas, G., Aune, D., Tsilidis, K. K., Heath, A., Schulze, M. B., Jannasch, F., Srour, B., Kaaks, R., Rodriguez-Barranco, M., Tagliabue, G., Agudo, A., Panico, S., Ardanaz, E., Chirlaque, M.-D., Vineis, P., Tumino, R., Perez-Cornago, A., Andersen, J. L. M., Tjønneland, A., Skeie, G., Weiderpass, E., Monteiro, C. A., Gunter, M. J., Millett, C., & Huybrechts, I.
Venue
The Lancet Planetary Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e219-e232
ISSN
2542-5196
Cited by
118
References
6
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2023-05-01)
Funders
  • World Cancer Research Fund (IIG_FULL_2020_033)
  • Institut National Du Cancer
  • Imperial College London
  • Institut Gustave-Roussy
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Kræftens Bekæmpelse
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • Medical Research Council (1000143, MR/M012190/1)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  • Cancer Research UK (C33493/A29678)
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe
  • National Research Council
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer
  • World Cancer Research Fund International
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • University of Maryland School of Public Health
  • Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Consejería de Salud y Familias, Junta de Andalucía
  • Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  • Cancerfonden
  • Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer
  • Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review