Cited by 918

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pagliai, G., Dinu, M., Madarena, M. P., Bonaccio, M., Iacoviello, L., Sofi, F.·2021·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that high consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) is associated with an increase in non-communicable diseases, overweight and obesity. The present study systematically reviewed all observational studies that investigated the association between UPF consumption and health status. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar was conducted, and reference lists of included articles were checked. Only cross-sectional and prospective cohort studies were included. At the end of the selection process, twenty-three studies (ten cross-sectional and thirteen prospective cohort studies) were included in the systematic review. As regards the cross-sectional studies, the highest UPF consumption was associated with a significant increase in the risk of overweight/obesity (+39 %), high waist circumference (+39 %), low HDL-cholesterol levels (+102 %) and the metabolic syndrome (+79 %), while no significant associations with hypertension, hyperglycaemia or hypertriacylglycerolaemia were observed. For prospective cohort studies evaluating a total population of 183 491 participants followed for a period ranging from 3·5 to 19 years, highest UPF consumption was found to be associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality in five studies (risk ratio (RR) 1·25, 95 % CI 1·14, 1·37;P< 0·00001), increased risk of CVD in three studies (RR 1·29, 95 % CI 1·12, 1·48;P= 0·0003), cerebrovascular disease in two studies (RR 1·34, 95 % CI 1·07, 1·68;P= 0·01) and depression in two studies (RR 1·20, 95 % CI 1·03, 1·40;P= 0·02). In conclusion, increased UPF consumption was associated, although in a limited number of studies, with a worse cardiometabolic risk profile and a higher risk of CVD, cerebrovascular disease, depression and all-cause mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114520002688

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis found weak to no evidence for an association between ultra-processed food exposure and hyperglycaemia (odds ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 3.52; credibility class V; GRADE very low).

    “We found weak to no evidence for associations between exposure to ultra-processed foods and hyperglycaemia (odds ratio 1.10, 0.34 to 3.52; class V; very low)”
  • Overall confidence in the results of seven meta-analysis studies was low owing to lack of clarity as to whether the review methods were established before the conduct of the review (AMSTAR critical item 2).

    “we considered the overall confidence in the results of seven meta-analysis studies to be low owing to lack of clarity as to whether the review methods were established before the conduct of the review (AMSTAR critical item 2)”
  • Analysis found weak to no evidence for an association between ultra-processed food exposure and hypertriglyceridaemia (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.50; credibility class V; GRADE very low).

    “We found weak to no evidence for associations between exposure to ultra-processed foods and hypertriglyceridaemia (odds ratio 0.95, 0.60 to 1.50; class V; very low)”
  • Analysis found weak to no evidence for an association between ultra-processed food exposure and low high density lipoprotein concentrations (odds ratio 2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 3.21; credibility class IV; GRADE very low).

    “and low high density lipoprotein concentrations (odds ratio 2.02, 1.27 to 3.21; class IV; very low)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1590/1516-3180.2018.0363070219 · DOI
  2. 10.3945/ajcn.116.135004 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1186/s12966-015-0317-y · DOI
  4. Mendonça, 2017, Ultra-processed food consumption and the incidence of hypertension in a Mediterranean Cohort: the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra Project, Am J Hypertens, 30, 358, 10.1093/ajh/hpw137 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1136/bmj.l1451 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1017/S1368980017002130 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105057 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1186/s12940-015-0036-5 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S1368980009005291 · DOI
  10. 10.3390/nu10030365 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/s41395-018-0137-1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.047 · DOI
  13. 10.1136/bmj.l2289 · DOI
  14. 10.17269/s41997-018-0130-x · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.004 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s00394-019-01970-1 · DOI
  17. 40. Silva Meneguelli, T , Viana Hinkelmann, J , Hermsdorff, HHM , et al. (2020) Food consumption by degree of processing and cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review. Int J Food Sci Nutr (epublication ahead of print version 13 February 2020).
  18. 10.1186/1476-069X-13-43 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/S0007114518001046 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Higgins, 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
  21. Gibney, 2018, Ultra-processed foods: definitions and policy issues, Curr Dev Nutr, 3, nzy077, 10.1093/cdn/nzy077 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/obr.12107 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/gerona/glz140 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0232676 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/S1368980018000861 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.035 · DOI
  28. 10.1017/S136898001700115X · DOI
  29. Canhada, 2019, Ultra-processed foods, incident overweight and obesity, and longitudinal changes in weight and waist circumference: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil), Public Health Nutr, 17, 1
  30. 10.1017/S1368980018003890 · DOI
  31. 10.1136/bmj.l1949 · DOI
  32. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009892 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1161/JAHA.114.000934 · DOI
  34. Monteiro, 2016, NOVA. The star shines bright, World Nutr, 7, 28
  35. 10.1161/circ.141.suppl_1.49 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pagliai, G., Dinu, M., Madarena, M. P., Bonaccio, M., Iacoviello, L., & Sofi, F.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2020-08-14
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
308-318
ISSN
  • 0007-1145
  • 1475-2662
Cited by
918
References
14
Language
en
Update notices
addendum (2020-08-14)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review