The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the effect of demographic factors, socioeconomic factors, and risk aversion on mobility during the COVID-19 epidemic in France under lockdown: a population-based study
Open accessAbstract
Background: On March 17, 2020, French authorities implemented a nationwide lockdown to respond to the COVID-19 epidemic and curb the surge of patients requiring critical care. Assessing the effect of lockdown on individual displacements is essential to quantify achievable mobility reductions and identify the factors driving the changes in social dynamics that affected viral diffusion. We aimed to use mobile phone data to study how mobility in France changed before and during lockdown, breaking down our findings by trip distance, user age and residency, and time of day, and analysing regional data and spatial heterogeneities. Methods: For this population-based study, we used temporally resolved travel flows among 1436 administrative areas of mainland France reconstructed from mobile phone trajectories. Data were stratified by age class (younger than 18 years, 18-64 years, and 65 years or older). We distinguished between residents and non-residents and used population data and regional socioeconomic indicators from the French National Statistical Institute. We measured mobility changes before and during lockdown at both local and country scales using a case-crossover framework. We analysed all trips combined and trips longer than 100 km (termed long trips), and separated trips by daytime or night-time, weekdays or weekends, and rush hours. Findings: Lockdown caused a 65% reduction in the countrywide number of displacements (from about 57 million to about 20 million trips per day) and was particularly effective in reducing work-related short-range mobility, especially during rush hour, and long trips. Geographical heterogeneities showed anomalous increases in long-range movements even before lockdown announcement that were tightly localised in space. During lockdown, mobility drops were unevenly distributed across regions (eg, Île-de-France, the region of Paris, went from 585 000 to 117 000 outgoing trips per day). They were strongly associated with active populations, workers employed in sectors highly affected by lockdown, and number of hospitalisations per region, and moderately associated with the socioeconomic level of the regions. Major cities largely shrank their pattern of connectivity, reducing it mainly to short-range commuting (95% of traffic leaving Paris was contained in a 201 km radius before lockdown, which was reduced to 29 km during lockdown). Interpretation: Lockdown was effective in reducing population mobility across scales. Caution should be taken in the timing of policy announcements and implementation, because anomalous mobility followed policy announcements, which might act as seeding events. Conversely, risk aversion might be beneficial in further decreasing mobility in highly affected regions. We also identified socioeconomic and demographic constraints to the efficacy of restrictions. The unveiled links between geography, demography, and timing of the response to mobility restrictions might help to design interventions that minimise invasiveness while contributing to the current epidemic response. Funding: Agence Nationale de la Recherche, EU, REACTing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?
Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30567-5 · Cited by 3,648
Bi, Q., Wu, Y., Mei, S., Ye, C., Zou, X., Zhang, Z., Liu, X., Wei, L., Truelove, S. A., Zhang, T., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30287-5 · Cited by 1,958
Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases
Balcan, D., Colizza, V., Gonçalves, B., Hu, H., Ramasco, J. J., & Vespignani, A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906910106 · Cited by 1,380
Self-citationModelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review
Funk, S., Salathé, M., & Jansen, V. A. A. (2010) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2010.0142 · Cited by 1,314
Rubin, G. J., Amlot, R., Page, L., & Wessely, S. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2651 · Cited by 1,106
Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19
Bonaccorsi, G., Pierri, F., Cinelli, M., Flori, A., Galeazzi, A., Porcelli, F., Schmidt, A. L., Valensise, C. M., Scala, A., Quattrociocchi, W., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2007658117 · Cited by 1,004
Population flow drives spatio-temporal distribution of COVID-19 in China
Jia, J. S., Lu, X., Yuan, Y., Xu, G., Jia, J., & Christakis, N. A. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2284-y · Cited by 835
Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle
Oliver, N., Lepri, B., Sterly, H., Lambiotte, R., Deletaille, S., De Nadai, M., Letouzé, E., Salah, A. A., Benjamins, R., Cattuto, C., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc0764 · Cited by 631
Self-citationImpact of lockdown on COVID-19 epidemic in Île-de-France and possible exit strategies
Di Domenico, L., Pullano, G., Sabbatini, C. E., Boëlle, P.-Y., & Colizza, V. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01698-4 · Cited by 396
Self-citationPepe, E., Bajardi, P., Gauvin, L., Privitera, F., Lake, B., Cattuto, C., & Tizzoni, M. (2020) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-020-00575-2 · Cited by 318
Cited by
Socioeconomic status determines COVID-19 incidence and related mortality in Santiago, Chile
Mena, G. E., Martinez, P. P., Mahmud, A. S., Marquet, P. A., Buckee, C. O., & Santillana, M. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg5298 · Cited by 431
Gozzi, N., Tizzoni, M., Chinazzi, M., Ferres, L., Vespignani, A., & Perra, N. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22601-6 · Cited by 142
Socioeconomic status determines COVID-19 incidence and related mortality in Santiago, Chile
Mena, G., Martinez, P. P., Mahmud, A. S., Marquet, P. A., Buckee, C. O., & Santillana, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.01.12.21249682 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Pullano, G., Valdano, E., Scarpa, N., Rubrichi, S., & Colizza, V.
- Venue
- The Lancet Digital Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e638-e649
- ISSN
- 2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3094964170
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 63.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the effect of demographic factors, socioeconomic factors, and risk aversion on mobility during the COVID-19 epidemic in France under lockdown: a population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30243-0
- The paper
- Pullano, G., Valdano, E., Scarpa, N., Rubrichi, S., & Colizza, V. (2020). Evaluating the effect of demographic factors, socioeconomic factors, and risk aversion on mobility during the COVID-19 epidemic in France under lockdown: a population-based study. The Lancet Digital Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30243-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.