Cited by 161Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationOphthalmology and Visual Health ResearchMachine Learning in Healthcare

Large language models and their impact in ophthalmology

Open access
Betzler, Bjorn Kaijun, Chen, Haichao, Cheng, Ching-Yu, Lee, Cecilia S, Ning, Guochen, Song, Su Jeong, Lee, Aaron Y, Kawasaki, Ryo +17 more·2023·The Lancet Digital Health

Abstract

The advent of generative artificial intelligence and large language models has ushered in transformative applications within medicine. Specifically in ophthalmology, large language models offer unique opportunities to revolutionise digital eye care, address clinical workflow inefficiencies, and enhance patient experiences across diverse global eye care landscapes. Yet alongside these prospects lie tangible and ethical challenges, encompassing data privacy, security, and the intricacies of embedding large language models into clinical routines. This Viewpoint highlights the promising applications of large language models in ophthalmology, while weighing up the practical and ethical barriers towards their real-world implementation. This Viewpoint seeks to stimulate broader discourse on the potential of large language models in ophthalmology and to galvanise both clinicians and researchers into tackling the prevailing challenges and optimising the benefits of large language models while curtailing the associated risks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00201-7

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI agents continuously evolve through iterative learning from new datasets, enabling them to adapt to emerging medical knowledge and evolving clinical standards.

    “Moreover, AI agents continuously evolve through iterative learning from new datasets, enabling them to adapt to emerging medical knowledge and evolving clinical standards.73,74”

    From A foundational architecture for AI agents in healthcare (2025) · cites this paper as [73]

    The section on streamlining medical-record documentation (page unavailable) anticipates improvements as LLMs evolve and are trained on more comprehensive datasets. But the capability-limitations section warns that LLMs might lag behind new research and clinical guidelines. The paper does not say AI agents continuously learn from new datasets or thereby keep pace with evolving clinical standards. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This capability is crucial for creating virtual patients that accurately simulate real patients for educational purposes.

    “This capability is crucial for creating VPs that accurately simulate real patients for educational purposes39,40.”

    From A large language model digital patient system enhances ophthalmology history taking skills (2025) · cites this paper as [40]

    The section “Enhancing Ophthalmic Education with LLMs” (page not provided) says LLMs can role-play real-world interactions and simulate clinical scenarios for training. It does not establish that they create virtual patients that accurately simulate real patients, or that this capability is crucial to doing so. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]OpenAI. GPT-4 Technical Report2023 March 01, 2023:[arXiv:2303.08774 p.]. Available from: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230308774O. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Betzler, B. K., Chen, H., Cheng, C.-Y., Lee, C. S., Ning, G., Song, S. J., Lee, A. Y., Kawasaki, R., van Wijngaarden, P., Grzybowski, A., He, M., Li, D., Ran Ran, A., Ting, D. S. W., Teo, K., Ruamviboonsuk, P., Sivaprasad, S., Chaudhary, V., Tadayoni, R., Wang, X., Cheung, C. Y., Zheng, Y., Wang, Y. X., Tham, Y. C., & Wong, T. Y.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (KR)
  • Osaka University Hospital (JP)
  • Foundation for the Development of Ophthalmology (PL)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Rajavithi Hospital (TH)
  • NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
  • Beihang University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN)
  • Singapore National Eye Center (SG)
Corresponding author
Tham, Yih Chung
Venue
The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
e917-e924
ISSN
2589-7500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388922836
Cited by
161
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 49
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Medical Research Council (NMRC/MOH/HCSAINV21nov-0001)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2502800)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
large language models, ophthalmology, generative AI, clinical workflow, patient experience, data privacy, ethical considerations, clinical implementation
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Language, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review