Cited by 0Chinese history and philosophyHistorical and Political StudiesChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tutor to the Crown Prince and Chancellor of the Empire

Liang Cai·2026·Convict Politics

Abstract

Chapter 11 explores how Confucians sought to realize their philosopher-king ideal but failed to introduce reform. Although their rise to power was initially facilitated by a witchcraft scandal that dismantled established families, once in key positions Confucians began to apply their philosophical idealism to reshape the rules of bureaucracy. They formed intellectual communities anchored in teacher–disciple relationships and actively recommended each other for significant roles. More importantly, they monopolized the roles of tutors to the crown prince and introduced a new concept – “teachers to the emperor” – a tradition that endured until the early twentieth century. Social networks transformed intellectual authority into political power. However, once Confucians assumed official positions, they became servants of the throne and were expected to conform to bureaucratic norms. Without establishing institutions independent of officialdom, Confucian ideology and moral discourse, along with their roles as imperial tutors, were insufficient to secure their autonomy or grant them the power to dissent, challenge political authority, or implement significant reforms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781009019866.012

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Xidan, 1989, Liji jijie, 2
  2. 2000, Zhongguo de Wangquanzhuyi, 263
  3. Bo, 2001, Jianbo sixiang wenxian lunji, 28
  4. Xun, 1987, Mengzi zhengyi, 1
  5. Ying, 1980, Hanshi waizhuan jishi, 92
  6. Zuozhang, 1985, Qin Han guanzhi shigao, 313
  7. Hanguang, 1966, Liangjin nanbeichao shizu zhengzhi zhi yanjiu
  8. Min, 2000, Shangshu Yizhu, 14
  9. Qian, 1964, Shiji, 99
  10. Tillman, 2002, Historic Analogies and Evaluative Judgments: Zhuge Liang as Portrayed in Chen Shou’s ‘Chronicle of the Three Kingdoms’ and Pei Songzhi’s Commentary, Oriens Extremus, 43, 60
  11. Yuqing, 2012, Dongjin menfa zhengzhi
  12. Eno, 1998, Constructing China: the Interaction of Culture and Economics, 57
  13. Shaughnessy, 1989, The Role of Grand Protector Shi in the Consolidation of the Zhou Conquest, Ars Orientalis, 19, 51
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, 2006, Readings in Han Chinese Thought, 11
  15. Aihe, 2000, Cosmology and Political Culture in Early China
  16. Schaberg, 2006, Text and Ritual in Early China, 194
  17. 10.1163/15406253-03501008 · DOI
  18. Yi, 2000, Xinshu Jiaozhu, 183
  19. Buwei, 2000, The Annals of Lü Buwei, 121
  20. Sabattini, 2009, Prenatal Instructions and Moral Education of the Crown Prince in the ‘Xinshu’ by Jia Yi, Oriens Extremus, 48, 71
  21. Dongrun, 1981, Zhang juzheng da zhuan
  22. Yingshi, 1987, Shi yu Zhongguo wenhua

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Cai, L.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Liang Cai
Venue
Convict Politics
Published
2026-01-29
Pages
306-340
OpenAlex
W7119502018
Cited by
0
References
19
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical and Political Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Keywords
Confucianism, crown prince, teacher-disciple relationship, Confucian bureaucracy, social networks, Confucian reform, Qing dynasty, Confucian ideology, moral discourse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review