Cited by 17Chinese history and philosophyChina's Ethnic Minorities and RelationsBiographical and Historical Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Great Family in Medieval South China

Grafflin, Dennis·1981·Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2719000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After the formative years of the Eastern Jin, the death of Xie An in 385 apparently marked the end of the aristocracy in the South, which had dominated the court through one or more powerful families.

    “After the formative years of the Eastern Jin, the death of Xie An i.t~, leader of the Xie family, in 385, apparently marked the end of the aristocracy in the South, which had dominated the court through one or more powerful families (Grafflin 1981:73).”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grafflin, D.
Corresponding author
Grafflin, Dennis
Venue
Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1981-06
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
65
ISSN
0073-0548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796890482
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Biographical and Historical Analysis
Keywords
lineage, kinship, family organization, medieval China, South China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review