Cited by 52Chinese history and philosophyBiographical and Historical AnalysisHistorical and Political Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Aristocratic Families in Early Imperial China: A Case Study of the Po-Ling Ts'ui Family

Ebrey, Patricia Buckley·1978·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Much scholarly work has been published on the Chinese medieval 'aristocracy', in Chinese, Japanese and Western languages. It is commonly accepted that the change from an aristocratic society to a 'meritocracy' was one of the turning points of Chinese history. But since almost every aspect of political, economic and cultural history is involved in questions of the nature of the aristocracy, perhaps the only way to test theories of the means by which a small elite preserved its social status and political prestige for seven or eight hundred years is by tracing the fortunes of a single family in great detail. The present work is a fully documented case study of the Ts'uis of Po-ling from the first through the ninth centuries. By observing OW evolution of the Ts'uis as an aristocratic kinship group – and an unusual quantity of rich and original source material was available to Dr Ebrey – the author demonstrates OW fluctuation in aristocratic influence and tic changing basis of such families' prestige and power. Studies such as this are essential to enlarge our knowledge not only of medieval society and politics in China but also the development of family and lineage. In the light of the detailed evidence Dr Ebrey provides, many conventional views many well have to be abandoned.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511759857

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By sheltering dependents and peasants outside the official household registration system, great families deprived the state of tax revenue and corvée labour, contributing significantly to the sharp decline in registered population.

    “By sheltering dependents and peasants outside the official household registration system, they deprived the state of both tax revenue and corvée labour, contributing significantly to the sharp decline in registered population during this period.”
  • Virtually all Boling Cui who achieved eminence in Northern Wei and thereafter were descendants of one man, Cui Yi.

    “that virtually all the Boling who achieved eminence in Northern Wei and thereafter were descendants of one man, Cui Yi W~, who had served the Former Yan M~ and whose descendants eventually came to serve Northern Wei (Ebrey 1978:53 ff.).”
  • Ebrey does not contest the view of the limited power of civil office.

    “Ebrey does not contest this view of the limited power of civil office:”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ebrey, P. B.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Ebrey, Patricia Buckley
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
1978-06-22
OpenAlex
W4243011176
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.32
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Biographical and Historical Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical and Political Studies
Keywords
noble families, kinship groups, lineage, social status, political prestige, early imperial China, Tang dynasty, Wei-Jin period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review