The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks and Climate Sensitivity
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CH4 has a much higher impact on radiative forcing than CO2 and a much shorter perturbation lifetime.
“Comparing the impact behaviors of the same amount of CH4 and CO2, for example, CH4 has a much higher impact on radiative forcing than CO2 (i.e., approximate 120 times higher in the first year after the emission) and a much shorter perturbation lifetime (11.8 years for CH4 and millennia for CO2)17,23.”
From Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
The available copy contains a chapter listing and a notice that the chapter text is available only as a PDF; it provides no substantive passage to assess this claim. Searches for CH4, methane, radiative forcing, and the stated 11.8-year lifetime found no relevant passage in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredN2O has a relatively longer perturbation lifetime of 109 years and is more potent compared to CO2 and CH4.
“N2O has a relative longer perturbation lifetime (109 years) and is also more potent compared to CO2 and CH423.”
From Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
No passage in our indexed copy addresses N2O’s 109-year perturbation lifetime or compares its potency with CO2 and CH4. Searches for “N2O,” “nitrous oxide,” “109,” and “perturbation lifetime” returned no relevant passage; the material retrieved is website navigation and a notice that the chapter’s HTML is unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forster, P. M., Smith, C. J., Walsh, T., Lamb, W. F., Lamboll, R., Hauser, M., Ribes, A., Rosen, D., Gillett, N., Palmer, M. D., et al. (2023) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-15-2295-2023 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials
Peiseler, L., Schenker, V., Schatzmann, K., Pfister, S., Wood, V., & Schmidt, T. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54634-y · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Diamond, M. S. (2023) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-23-8259-2023 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions
Wang, Y., de Boer, I. J. M., Persson, U. M., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Cederberg, C., Gerber, P. J., Smith, P., & van Middelaar, C. E. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43452-3 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Aviation Fuel Systems
Quiroz, D., Greene, J. M., Limb, B. J., & Quinn, J. C. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c09113 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Cloud condensation nuclei concentrations derived from the CAMS reanalysis
Block, K., Haghighatnasab, M., Partridge, D. G., Stier, P., & Quaas, J. (2024) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-16-443-2024 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Quiroz, D., McGowen, J., & Quinn, J. C. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143178 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- (IPCC), I. P. O. C. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
- Venue
- Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2023-07-06
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 923-1054
- OpenAlex
- W4382358731
- Cited by
- 1,782
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 179 · 2025: 379 · 2024: 552 · 2023: 450 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 430.16
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Keywords
- Earth's energy budget, climate feedbacks, climate sensitivity, radiative forcing, climate change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
