Cited by 8Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEthics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Euthanasia in Patients with Intolerable Suffering Due to an Irremediable Psychiatric Illness: A Psychiatric Perspective

Vandenberghe, Joris·2017·Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781108182799.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is unlikely that a desire to die emerging as a symptom of psychiatric illness would do so without significantly impairing the patient's decision-making capacity.

    “Firstly, that while a desire to die can certainly emerge as a symptom of psychiatric illness, it is unlikely -if not implausible -that it would do so without significantly impairing the patient's decision-making capacity [10].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vandenberghe, J.
Corresponding author
Vandenberghe, Joris
Venue
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
Published
2017-09-21
OpenAlex
W2754182015
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.75
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
euthanasia, mental illness, end-of-life decisions, decision-making capacity, assisted dying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review