Assessment of patient decision-making capacity in the context of voluntary euthanasia for psychic suffering caused by psychiatric disorders: a qualitative study of approaches among Belgian physicians
Abstract
Objective: In Belgium, people with an incurable psychiatric disorder can file a request for euthanasia claiming unbearable psychic suffering. For the request to be accepted, it has to meet stringent legal criteria. One of the requirements is that the patient possesses decision-making capacity. The patient’s decision-making capacity is assessed by physicians. The objective of our study is to provide insight in the assessment of decision-making capacity in the context of euthanasia for patients with psychic suffering caused by a psychiatric disorder. Method: Twenty-two semistructured interviews with psychiatrists and neurologists were analysed with NVivo, a qualitative analysis software to code and organise transcribed data. Results: Different views and approaches regarding decision-making capacity in the context of euthanasia emerged from the data. Most of the physicians have some knowledge of the cognitive ability approach on decision-making capacity. According to this approach, four abilities constitute decision-making capacity: communication, understanding, appreciation and reasoning. We observed differences in the way these abilities are valued in relation to competence. Some physicians take additional elements into consideration when assessing decision-making capacity. Physicians acquired their knowledge on the subject in many different ways. Most of the physicians reported that decision-making capacity was not part of their training. Conclusion: We conclude that physicians assess decision-making capacity in different ways and that personal values and beliefs influence their approach. As such, a common approach in assessing the decision-making capacity of a patient among the interviewed physicians is lacking. Less arbitrariness could be obtained by consistently implementing the cognitive ability approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only one Dutch and one Belgian study have shown that the assessment of mental capacity differs among individual physicians, partly due to personal values and belief systems, and in some cases seems flawed, leading to dissensions among physicians on the evaluation outcome.
“To our knowledge, only one Dutch and one Belgian study on this topic have shown that the assessment of this criterion differs among individual physicians (i.e. to some extent due to their personal values and belief system), 32 and, in some cases, seems even flawed, which has led to dissensions among physicians on the evaluation outcome. 17”
From Euthanasia in adults with psychiatric conditions: A descriptive study of the experiences of Belgian psychiatrists (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453 · see citing works
Assessment of Patients' Competence to Consent to Treatment
Appelbaum, P. S. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp074045 · Cited by 1,427 · see citing works
Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision making
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0985 · Cited by 1,134 · see citing works
Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Prefessionals
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195103724.001.0001 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making
Buchanan, A. E., & Brock, D. W. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171946 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Capacity evaluations of psychiatric patients requesting assisted death in The Netherlands
Doernberg, S. N., Peteet, J. R., & Kim, S. Y. H. (2016) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/j.psym.2016.06.005 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Lessons from Belgium
(2017) · doi:10.1017/9781108182799 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Saks, E. R., Dunn, L. B., Marshall, B. J., Nayak, G. V., Golshan, S., & Jeste, D. V. (2002) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00019442-200203000-00007 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Physicians’ personal values in determining medical decision-making capacity: a survey study
Hermann, H., Trachsel, M., & Biller-Andorno, N. (2015) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102263 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Baumstarck, K., Boyer, L., Boucékine, M., Aghababian, V., Parola, N., Lançon, C., & Auquier, P. (2013) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.03.008 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Saks, E. R. (2002) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajgp.10.2.166 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
[Perspectives on patient competence in psychiatry: cognitive functions, emotions and values].
Ruissen, A. M., Meynen, G., & Widdershoven, G. A. M. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Assessment of Patients' Competence to Consent to Treatment
&NA; (2009) · Survey of Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/01.sa.0000318698.95851.5f · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Vandenberghe, J. (2017) · Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide · doi:10.1017/9781108182799.010 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Verhofstadt, M., Audenaert, K., Van den Broeck, K., Deliens, L., Mortier, F., Titeca, K., De Bacquer, D., & Chambaere, K. (2021) · Science Progress · doi:10.1177/00368504211029775 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schweitser, F., Stuy, J., Distelmans, W., & Rigo, A.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Odisee, University of Applied Sciences (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Schweitser, Frank
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Ethics
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-08-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e38-e38
- ISSN
- 0306-6800 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-4257
- OpenAlex
- W3047042399
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- decision-making capacity, voluntary euthanasia, psychological suffering, mental illness, physician assessment, competency assessment, physician training, personal values and beliefs, Belgian euthanasia law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review