Public Sector Transparency
Open accessAbstract
Contains fulltext : 175502.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The paper's findings resemble some prior results on manifest transparency and trust.
“These findings mirror some of what has been found with respect to manifest transparency and trust (e.g., Cucciniello et al., 2017;Grimmelikhuijsen et al., 2017)”
From Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments (2020) · cites this paper as Grimmelikhuijsen et al., 2017
Cites
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mus048 · Cited by 565 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Also Grimmelikhuijsen and Meijer (2014) show how different types of citizens are affected differently by transparency.”
InfluentialSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101497 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Weske, U., Bouwman, R., & Tummers, L.
- Venue
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2017-07-13
- Pages
- 291-312
- OpenAlex
- W2741904874
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 15.95
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dspace.library.uu.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Administrative Law and Governance
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- government transparency, open government
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
