Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 54

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ASR FORUM: ENGAGING WITH AFRICAN INFORMAL ECONOMIES: Capital’s New Frontier: From “Unusable” Economies to Bottom-of-the-Pyramid Markets in Africa

Dolan, Catherine, Roll, Kate·2013·African Studies Review

Abstract

Over the last decade, the bottom-of-the-pyramid (BoP) approach has gained prominence as a tool of “inclusive” capitalism in sub-Saharan Africa. This approach reframes development as a seamless outcome of core business activities, one that can ameliorate poverty by bringing much-needed products and services to the poor and generating employment opportunities for informal and subsistence workers as “micro-entrepreneurs.” Yet while transnational capital has set its sights on Africa’s “underserved” yet potentially buoyant markets, BoP initiatives do more than seize upon the entrepreneurial talent and aspirations of Africa’s informal economies. This article argues, rather, that these initiatives create BoP economies through a set of market technologies, practices, and discourses that render the spaces and actors at the bottom of the pyramid knowable, calculable, and predictable to global business. The article describes how these technologies extend new forms of market governance over the informal poor, reconfiguring their habits, social practices, and economic strategies under the banner of poverty reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/asr.2013.82

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. Mackenzie, 2007, Do Economists Make Markets?
  2. 10.1215/9780822389781 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Prahalad, 2004, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits
  4. Simmel, 1950, The Sociology of Georg Simmel
  5. Proctor, 2013, Solar Energy: African Economies’ Secret Weapon, CNN Money
  6. Little, 2000, What It Means to Be Restructured: ‘Non-traditional’ Commodities and Structural Adjustment in Sub-Saharan Africa, 59
  7. 10.1177/0011392108093832 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/03085140600960781 · DOI · Paper page
  9. London, 2009, Making Better Investments at the Base of the Pyramid, Harvard Business Review, 87, 106
  10. Escobar, 1994, Encountering Development: The Making of the Third World
  11. Banerjee, 2011, Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Poverty
  12. 10.1111/1467-9493.00140 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Perry, 2011, Lifeblood: How to Change the World One Dead Mosquito at a Time
  14. Mosse, 2005, Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice
  15. 10.1215/9780822387640 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1177/0011392107076079 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Simanis, 2011, Next Generation Business Strategies for the Base of the Pyramid: New Approaches for Building Mutual Value, 103
  18. Rajak Dinah . 2007. “In Good Company.” D.Phil. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Sussex.
  19. Foucault Michel . 1982. “The Subject and Power.” In Power (volume 3 of The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984), edited by Faubion J. , 326–48. London: Penguin.
  20. 10.1080/13552074.2012.663619 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dean, 1999, Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society
  22. Hart, 2005, Developing Native Capability: What Multinational Corporations Can Learn from the Base of the Pyramid, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3, 28
  23. Garcia, 2008, Youth in Africa’s Labour Market
  24. 10.1080/13552070802465441 · DOI
  25. Scott, 1998, Seeing Like a State
  26. 10.1177/0308275X11420117 · DOI
  27. 10.1215/08992363-1498001 · DOI
  28. Peters, 2001, Education, Enterprise Culture and the Entrepreneurial Self: A Foucaultian Perspective, Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2, 58
  29. 10.1525/ae.2006.33.3.413 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/0170840605056393 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Agrawal, 2005, Environmentality: Technologies of Government and Political Subjects, 10.1215/9780822386421 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Roy, 2010, Poverty Capital: Microfinance and the Making of Development, 10.4324/9780203854716 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Moyo, 2009, Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa
  35. Kannabiran, 2005, Marketing Self-Help, Managing Poverty, Economic and Political Weekly, 20, 3716
  36. 10.1215/08992363-1443583 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Carrier, 1998, Virtualism: A New Political Economy
  38. 10.1525/ae.2002.29.4.981 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Dolan Catherine , Johnstone-Louis Mary , and Scott Linda . 2012b. “CARE Bangladesh Rural Sales Programme: Teaching Case.” Oxford: Saïd Business School.
  40. Burchell, 1996, Foucault and Political Reason, 19
  41. Simanis, 2009, Innovation From the Inside Out, MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 78
  42. Rojas, 2004, Global Governmentality, 97
  43. 10.1017/S000397560500010X · DOI · Paper page
  44. Kubzansky, 2011, Promise and Progress: Market-Based Solutions to Poverty in Africa
  45. 10.2307/41166407 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Mahajan, 2008, Africa Rising: How 900 Million African Consumers Offer More Than You Think
  47. Khanna, 2010, Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution
  48. Saul, 1999, Sub-Saharan Africa in Global Capitalism, Monthly Review, 51, 13, 10.14452/MR-051-03-1999-07_2 · DOI
  49. Hart, 2005, Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World’s Most Difficult Problems
  50. Dolan, 2011, Re-siting Corporate Responsibility: The Making of South Africa’s Avon Entrepreneurs, Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 60, 21, 10.3167/fcl.2011.600103 · DOI · Paper page
  51. London, 2011, Next Generation Business Strategies for the Base of the Pyramid: New Approaches for Building Mutual Value, 19
  52. Easterly, 2006, The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill And So Little Good, 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68925-3 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Allen, 2011, Contemporary Social and Sociological Theory: Visualizing Social Worlds
  54. Prahalad, 2002, Serving the World’s Poor, Profitably, Harvard Business Review, 80, 48
  55. Kolk, 2013, Reviewing a Decade of Research on the ‘Base/Bottom of the Pyramid’ (BOP) Concept, Business and Society
  56. Foucault, 1995, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
  57. 10.1086/656472 · DOI · Paper page
  58. University of Oxford. 2012. “The ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’ Approach: Responsible Capitalism or Business as Usual?” Public Debate, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, May 3.
  59. Hart, 2002, Disabling Globalization: Places of Power in Post-Apartheid South Africa
  60. 10.1080/03085149600000018 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Cornwall, 2000, Beneficiary, Consumer, Citizen: Perspectives on Participation for Poverty Reduction
  62. Mosse, 2005, The Aid Effect: Giving and Governing in International Development
  63. Kuriyan, 2012, Consumption, Technology, and Development: The ‘Poor’ as ‘Consumer.’, Information Technology and International Development, 8, 1
  64. Rave, 2010, How to Approach the “Base of the Pyramid”: A Business-Strategy and Country Analysis
  65. 10.1353/arw.2007.0092 · DOI
  66. 10.1017/CBO9780511492211 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1002/9780470775875 · DOI
  68. 2009, The Next Billions: Unleashing Business Potential in Untapped Markets
  69. Arora, 2011, The Empty Rhetoric of Poverty Reduction at the Base of the Pyramid, Organization, 1
  70. Boyd, 2010, Ways of Seeing in Environmental Law: How Deforestation Became an Object of Climate Governance, Ecology Law Quarterly, 37, 843
  71. 10.1215/9780822387138 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1093/heapol/czm016 · DOI
  73. 10.1525/aa.2005.107.3.377 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Blažekovic Marko . 2010. “Making Partnership Work: Cross-Sector Alliances Between Businesses and NGOs at the Bottom of the Pyramid.” D.Phil. thesis, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford.
  75. Ferguson, 1994, The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho
  76. Nonor, 2009, Ghana: Procter and Gamble Launch Always Care Programme, The Chronicle
  77. 10.1017/CBO9780511488856 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Burke, 1996, Lifebuoy Men, Lux Women: Commodification, Consumption, and Cleanliness in Modern Zimbabwe
  79. Colvin, 2009, Seeing Like a “PWA”: A Study of Therapeutic Citizens and Welfare Subjects in Cape Town, South Africa
  80. Neuwirth, 2012, Stealth of Nations: The Global Rise of the Informal Economy
  81. Harrison, 2010, Neoliberal Africa: The Impact of Global Social Engineering, 10.5040/9781350221499 · DOI
  82. Callon, 2009, Devices and Desires: How Useful Is the ‘New’ New Economic Sociology for Understanding Market Attachment?, Sociology Compass, 3, 267, 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00195.x · DOI
  83. Blowfield Mick , and Dolan Catherine . Forthcoming. “Bottom Billion Capitalism: The Possibility and Improbability of Business as Development Actor.” Third World Quarterly.
  84. London, 2011, Next Generation Business Strategies for the Base of the Pyramid: New Approaches for Building Mutual Value, 1
  85. Collier, 2007, The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It
  86. 10.1215/08992363-1443574 · DOI
  87. Stanford, 2010, Africa: Coke’s Last Frontier, Bloomberg Business Week
  88. 10.1111/j.1467-8322.2009.00675.x · DOI · Paper page
  89. Johnstone-Louis Mary . 2013. “The Stone that the Builder Refused? Women’s Entrepreneurship as a Means to Economic Growth, Human Development, and Empowerment: Analysis of Discourse by Elite Actors and Cases from Latin America.” D.Phil. Transfer of Status Report, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford.
  90. Kashyap, 2012, Rural Marketing, 2/e

Cited by

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Dolan, C., & Roll, K.
Venue
African Studies Review
Published
2013-11-20
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
123-146
ISSN
  • 0002-0206
  • 1555-2462
Cited by
54
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.